General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWatchfoxheadexplodes
(3,496 posts)Short and quick.
librechik
(30,678 posts)bastard.
duforsure
(11,885 posts)And call Trump under oath in public before them to deny it, otherwise their call for the truth is meaningless. I think this is another ploy to try and discredit and expose who spilled the beans to them about this happening.
CurtEastPoint
(18,674 posts)I'm in France now w/a shit connection.
triron
(22,029 posts)loans with the bank were cosigned by Russian Oligarchs close to Putin. Lawrence
was (imo) forced to retract the news he reported on this by MSNBC corporate.
This was MSNBC kowtowing to Trump et al imo.
That is what I believe happened, they were pressured into this. I think they should take it to court, maybe the truth will come out.
stopdiggin
(11,404 posts)O'Donnell apologized for not vetting and sourcing the story/reporting as it should be
SCantiGOP
(13,875 posts)There is no way to prove a negative.
"You murdered somebody in 1993. You have 24 hours to prove it is untrue." See how that works?
Captain Zero
(6,853 posts)If it's not true we will apologize. That's what NBC SHOULD tell him.
Vinca
(50,323 posts)Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)push this issue much further. Remember,Trump sued O'Donnell years ago and loss. O'Donnell has said that during the Deposition part of that suit,Trump was so unhinged and every statement made was a lie. Once Trump pushes to sue O'Donnell again,that previous suit becomes fair game and you just know where that would lead.
elias7
(4,035 posts)The only way to to prove it one way or another is to do the right thing and release loan forms
djacq
(1,634 posts)Lawrence said two statements that night;
"One source"
"If possible"
This is MSNBC Executives pressuring him to retract.