General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAm I the only one who thinks that sometimes things are just as they appear?
Epstein was suicidal. He had tried before. He couldn't stand life in prison so he took the easy way out.
He was a tricky bastard. He probably acted all normal and calm so he could be taken off suicide watch.
He planned it.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)A useful tool too often ignored in these parts.
Yonnie3
(17,441 posts)I am joking of course.
It indeed useful and often ignored.
Shaddox
(384 posts)This pile of paystubs indicates a distinct lack of secondary education.
SharonAnn
(13,773 posts)USALiberal
(10,877 posts)brush
(53,778 posts)too so many rich and powerful people that this guy who had all kinds of damaging info in his head and endless money to hire attorney's to cut a deal, would just suddenly kill himselfwithout any assistance.
Please! Many are not buying that tale.
Ligyron
(7,632 posts)But it sure is convenient timing for the orange rapist and the rich and powerful.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)emmaverybo
(8,144 posts)rzemanfl
(29,557 posts)Lochloosa
(16,064 posts)ChubbyStar
(3,191 posts)Codeine
(25,586 posts)to me? Ive always been confused by that one.
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)Suggesting someone is not really interested in the silliness they're sure to witness if they 'pay attention'.
That's what I've always assumed.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)I am a dim bulb.
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)emmaverybo
(8,144 posts)Not appreciated.
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)emmaverybo
(8,144 posts)mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)I got's bunches for you!
Haven't lost a parent yet (I have 4) but I damn sure don't look forward to losing any of them. I'm sure it's going to be a huge bummer for a really long time.
Sorry someone was so insensitive
emmaverybo
(8,144 posts)mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)cwydro
(51,308 posts)emmaverybo
(8,144 posts)what this heartbreak is and that they manage. I like to believe we will see them again, in one way or another. Thank you for responding.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)But thats just me.
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)If you want to enlighten us, please share ... I think that's what Codeine was hoping for ...
cwydro
(51,308 posts)zackymilly
(2,375 posts)sheshe2
(83,763 posts)CatMor
(6,212 posts)Tipperary
(6,930 posts)Until theres other evidence, that seems the most likely.
MCC still has a lot to answer for however.
BootinUp
(47,146 posts):Sarcasm:
Eliot Rosewater
(31,112 posts)Cousin Dupree
(1,866 posts)onto their fainting couches.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,112 posts)USALiberal
(10,877 posts)Pacifist Patriot
(24,653 posts)It is entirely plausible he took his own life. What is improbable is the utter break down in suicide watch protocols that enabled him to do it. That is what needs explaining.
Mike 03
(16,616 posts)One thing I haven't seen in the hundreds of posts I've read today on DU is one person giving us one reason why he WOULDN'T kill himself. Look at how he controlled every single aspect of his life so it revolved around one thing and he would never see that one thing again. His lifestyle went up in smoke. What did he have to look forward to except complete and utter humiliation and facing his victims and their parents in a court of law, having all his secrets exposed. This was a very private guy and a controlling bully who lost control of everything.
BannonsLiver
(16,387 posts)A narcissist who is probably well aware of the different standards of justice in this country for those who are wealthy.
Those are two pretty good ones.
TwilightZone
(25,471 posts)This time, he was pretty much screwed and the process was only just beginning.
BannonsLiver
(16,387 posts)Did he kill himself? Probably. Is it okay to ask questions, demand accountability etc.? Fuckin A right it is.
Mike 03
(16,616 posts)A few things happened that really screwed up his escape plan. 1. The contents of his safe were seized. 2. People who had stood by him in the past were throwing him under the bus, like Dershowitz and Wexner. 3. The massive haul of documents he'd fought for years to keep secret was just dumped, which also contain extremely embarrassing revelations. I think he knew his game was up. I think his lawyers probably even told him his game was up.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)PandoraAwakened
(905 posts)...which is what makes the supposition of suicide implausible if you also believe the person to be narcissistic.
See post #97 below for an explanation.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,112 posts)condition and I cant believe how many people on this site go out of their WAY to argue with me and others about it
hmmm..hmmm...
plants everywhere
brush
(53,778 posts)extremely naive or are for some reason ignoring historyi.e., Oswald killed Kennedy without any previous connection to anybody else. Please!
And Jack Ruby got into the detention facility unassisted and killed Oswald before he could spill his guts. Really?
And the DC Madame hung herself conveniently too. Oka-a-a-a-a-y.
Come on! Political murders happen quite often. Epstein knew too much about the sexual predilections of too many powerful, rich people.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,112 posts)Epstein OBVIOUSLY murdered and yet I am told I am the one who is out of his mind.
We dont deserve to survive.
brush
(53,778 posts)Barr visited that jail before Epstein's demise. What the hell for? An Attorney General visiting a jail? Please.
And speaking of Russians (who have a preferred candidate), they use poison quite often.
Wonder if they offered their services?
kurtcagle
(1,603 posts)1. Epstein was wealthy enough that he could afford the best lawyers. He stood a good chance of a hung jury, a light sentence or even acquittal, especially if he turned state''s evidence.
2. He was in solitary, under video surveillance, and was a high profile politically connected prisoner.
3. There are a lot of people breathing easier now that he's gone.
4. Narcissists very seldom commit suicide. It is quite literally foreign to their nature
It is possible that this is exactly what it appears on the surface, but given the political ramifications of Epstein testifying and the brazen failure to follow protocol, it stinks to high heaven
Pacifist Patriot
(24,653 posts)Is not about the manner of his death, but why he was in a position to be able to take his own life. That doesn't make sense in these circumstances.
harumph
(1,900 posts)That's the mystery - and no, I'm not credulous enough to accept that
it was "Oops - we just fucked up - sorry..." situation. He may very well have
killed himself. That's not even the relevant issue. The issue is why he wasn't on
suicide watch. He was high value. What is going on? It's SOP to have prisoners
with his history on suicide watch - however much they dislike it. This stinks to me.
polichick
(37,152 posts)and would never tamper with justice, even if they did know him.
stopbush
(24,396 posts)already on a suicide watch, and he ends up killing himself.
If only there had been a sign that he might kill himself.
GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)But this is too convenient.
gristy
(10,667 posts)hlthe2b
(102,276 posts)suicide watch not long prior and taken off. Not to mention the scores of former Federal Prosecutors and even FBI officials who are questioning this.
Suicide in prison is not rare. Nor is homicide. Nor is negligent oversight. With FBI/IG investigations (even under Barr), there may be some final determination. We can only hope.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)Mike 03
(16,616 posts)with the difference of opinion is that some of us probably expected him to kill himself, and maybe those of us who did, like me, should be more skeptical of the suicide story. I definitely don't trust William Barr. I just think there's a better than fifty percent chance that it's a suicide, but by no means do I think it's 100%.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)I am always skeptical when it's anything that is remotely involving the US government. Always.
barbtries
(28,794 posts)dlk
(11,566 posts)The primary witness(es) are still around.
"Convenient" is one of those adjectives that really requires arguments (like verbs) to have much meaning. Convenient to whom? For what purpose? Having a cell phone is convenient (for me) at times, at other times it's very much not convenient. Sometimes it's convenient because it's a timer, sometimes because it's a paperweight, or a camera. Sometimes it's inconvenient for me but very convenient for somebody else--my wife, for instance, trying to tell me to do something.
To say it's convenient itself requires a raft of assumptions about to whom and for what--but they're often nothing more than assumptions.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Then she at least has to find you first.
Plus, it takes care of your girlfriend getting jealous when your wife calls.
dlk
(11,566 posts)And who terrorized and abused hundreds of underaged girls. Their probability of being outed has now been been drastically reduced. Comparing these horrific crimes to a timer or paperweight or camera doesnt sound the least bit misogynistic. Only someone with no conscience would make light of this horrific situation.
USALiberal
(10,877 posts)torius
(1,652 posts)with the help of Trump and Barr, and is back on his private island. We may never know...
lunasun
(21,646 posts)WheelWalker
(8,955 posts)riversedge
(70,218 posts)yes, I am very skeptical that anything or anyone had him killed.
Now, the why someone took him off suicide watch needs very careful study.
randr
(12,412 posts)A man with dubious sources of income and a corral of young girls who partied with an abundance of rich and powerful people was about to be put on a witness stand.
We wait for further news.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)AncientGeezer
(2,146 posts)uponit7771
(90,339 posts)AncientGeezer
(2,146 posts)What the HELL has that got to do with Epstein taking the cowards way out?
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)AncientGeezer
(2,146 posts)GoCubsGo
(32,083 posts)I can see how people can be suspicious, and I admit to a being a bit skeptical, myself. But, more likely than not, things are probably just as they appear.
BannonsLiver
(16,387 posts)IADEMO2004
(5,554 posts)atop the banana plant in the same Iowa flower bed needs a second look.
And it's disturbing to see so many people go down the conspiracy theory rabbit hole. This is how the people on the right ended up going over the edge. When the facts come out a lot of people on the left won't believe them if they don't line up with what they want to believe.
Please wait until the facts come out. Be rational.
PSPS
(13,598 posts)Never mind that the usual end to a child molester's life is suicide. It's THIS one that's all deep-state QAnon-worthy, probably with alien intervention to boot!
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)PSPS
(13,598 posts)This was one of Rumsfeld's 2001 fantasies that was uncritically repeated by the press at the time.
PandoraAwakened
(905 posts)Do you have citations for that?
I think, more accurately, it depends on whether the molester suffers or doesn't suffer from Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD).
If the molester has NPD, as many here claim about Epstein, then he most certainly did NOT commit suicide.
With NPD, what is called the "false image" has virtually complete control of all thought and behavior, and self-preservation at any cost is it's overriding objective. It is actually physically impossible for someone with NPD to even contemplate suicide.
I'm not speculating one way or the other about Epstein's death. I'm just saying you can't have it both ways. He could not have been both clinically narcissistic and suicidal.
Honestly, I really wish more people would do even a small amount of research on NPD---if they did, then they would completely understand and be able to anticipate every vile word and action coming from the pResident-in-Grief.
emmaverybo
(8,144 posts)options, facing confinement, knowing they may be killed even if they are kept apart from gen. pop., and who have a history of attempting, are at risk. He was likely a narcissistic sociopath.
It is not unusual for sociopaths to react strongly when their house of cards is destroyed, the lies they tell exposed, their ability to exploit others taken from them.
I do think he knew this time that he was finished.
As to how he was let off suicide watch, well thats a question. If we calm down and wait, it might get answered.
PandoraAwakened
(905 posts)that if one of those disorders is Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD), suicide is most definitely off the table.
I, for one, am not so willing to make an assertion such as "likely a narcissistic sociopath" about Epstein. Not all sociopaths, and, indeed, not all psychopaths, have NPD. In fact, most clinically diagnosed psychopaths do NOT also have NPD. Studies show that NPD in prison populations, including those convicted of murder, appears to be approximately the same as that of the general population---about 4%.
Again, I don't really have an opinion one way or another about whether Epstein died of suicide or homicide. Either of those determinations can only come from scientific forensic evidence, not from opinion. Now, whether you'll ever get to hear the truth of that evidence is a whole other story. The history of similar high-profile cases says no, you will not ever know, regardless of how calmly or hysterically you await.
The main point I wanted to make in my previous post, which seems pretty clear even as I re-read it, is that those who proffer the supposition, "Epstein committed suicide because he's a narcissist" are just sadly misinformed about the physiology of narcissism. "Narcissistic" and "suicidal" in the same sentence is an oxymoron.
emmaverybo
(8,144 posts)framework, they are not hard and fast, written in concrete, nor is the criteria to determine them as set out in the DSM followed to the letter in practice.
The prevalence of sociopathic features in the criminal population has been well studied and, in fact, as I am sure you know, gave rise to the original checklist developed by Hare.
Though you insist that Epstein, at least in so much as we know about his behavior, his history, his thinking, can only have been a pure narcissist, neither you nor I can diagnose him with certainty. He just as easily could be labeled a sociopath, and in any case, there is nothing in the literature to suggest these disorders are mutually exclusive.
As to your physiology of narcissism, as with other personality disorders, psychiatry has not determined a particular physiology underlying or linked to it, even on an interdisciplinary basis.
All of this, the area of personality disorders, is still theoretical, based on useful constructs, not even accepted universally as having a scientific basis. No matter, lets accept your diagnosis.
And lets discount the fact that psychiatry often fails miserably at predicting behavior. This is especially borne out in forensic psychology studies.
You are simply wrong to state that a person with narcissistic traits never commits suicide. Many propose that narcissism is a cloak for self-hatred, for low self-esteem. Whether or not that is the case in every case, a narcissistic individual placed in a room without mirrors, so to speak, deprived of the means by which to sustain the myth of self, no longer adored, stripped of props, without the means to exert ego, or to feed the incessant need to shine in the eyes of others, loses that defense and that weapon, the mask of narcissism. Aging Lotharios, whose physical appearance has been essential to feeding narcissistic needs, will sometimes suffer such distress, they enter therapy.
With or without entertaining psychological profiling, it is clear Epstein was losing everything. Freedom is crucial to most people. So that alone...
Epsteins victim stated that his and his partner-in-crimes lives revolved around their obsession with sex. But sex with young and beautiful people, not a shady cell mate. Gone. Money, status, power related to the ability to exploit others (if nothing else, Epstein was predatory) and to achieve ego satisfaction, all gone.
Epstein, by any measure, had every reason to commit suicide. Whether or not he did though, if he
was enabled, who knows? Neither you nor I do.
PandoraAwakened
(905 posts)that you saying, "Though you insist that Epstein...can only have been a pure narcissist" is a rather stunning example of the importance of reading comprehension skills, given that I most
most definitely did not insist on anything of the sort in any way whatsoever.
In fact, an actual analysis of what I wrote would lead an unbiased reader not clouded by defensiveness to understand that I doubt Epstein suffered from NPD.
In the interest of not encouraging the practice of gaslighting (which is itself a distinctively narcissistic trait), please reread your own post where YOU not I, definitively pronounced Epstein a "narcissistic sociopath" and proferred that as a primary argument for a suicide theory.
Finally, as I already stated, but am repeating to break through the skim-reading barrier, I myself am unwilling to opine on whether a suicide or a homicide occurred based solely on armchair psycho-analysis issued with sweeping, definitive statements, especially those that are in and of themselves oxymorons. And frankly, to do so is irresponsible.
P.S. A good friend just suggested to me that perhaps you thought my use of the term 'oxymoron' was a personal insult, which it definitely is not. Apparently, or so he insists, many people don't know that this is a grammar term for when someone combines two diametrically opposed ideas in the same proposition. He says most people think the term is synonymous to the derogatory 'moron.' I am so sorry if that is the cause of your misread.
Peace to you.
emmaverybo
(8,144 posts)heard of the physiology of narcissism which prevents a narcissist from killing herself.
PandoraAwakened
(905 posts)...a former English teacher who displays a blatant lack of comprehension by claiming an author has written something that they didn't...
or...
...a former English teacher who, called out for the double whammy of both misconstruing and misrepresenting, is incapable of acknowledging their error, instead deflecting to the childish ad hominem attack of "attitude" (progeny of a patriarchal society that attempts to paint women who stand up for themselves as "bitches" ).
How very, shall we say, narcissistic of you: "Oh for goodness sake. Attitude." ---"Not me, you!" --- "I'm no puppet; you're a puppet!" Sound familiar? The very fact that you can barely control yourself from responding with anything but an apology proves the point.
BTW, this current college professor believes in calling out insidious gaslighting at every turn that it rears its ugly head.
Good luck, and may peace and love find you.
emmaverybo
(8,144 posts)shraby
(21,946 posts)the finding that they ARE innocent.
Sometimes things are not as they seem.
Sunsky
(1,737 posts)However, I do not believe it is the case with Epstein's suicide. There are many unanswered questions. For example, why was he released from being on suicide watch just a few days post an attempted suicide? This is unheard of in this field. Did hand wringing take place which caused someone to go against best practices? Who knows?
Also, it is good to be skeptical at times. It's good not to accept everything at face value. When we have criminals at the helm of our government, I say skepticism is a necessity. It's early days.
I remember some of us being called conspiracy theorists after the Nov 2016 elections, when we stated that we believed Russia had meddled with our election.
Time will create a more accurate picture.
USALiberal
(10,877 posts)BadgerMom
(2,771 posts)StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)And when those shady deals were overturned, that at least two attempts were made to kill a man who was supposed to be in protected custody.
ColesCountyDem
(6,943 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,161 posts)there are others, and more facts, many many more facts would help
Pathwalker
(6,598 posts)See this: https://www.democraticunderground.com/100212361629
This death is very convenient.
underpants
(182,803 posts)Seems strange that he was able to get around the standard policy and procedures for someone under suicide watch. No spinning theory here. I just think knowing the how will allow for a full understanding.
warmfeet
(3,321 posts)So far, I see conjecture and speculation. Early days, don't you know. The story will be filled in with facts in the days ahead - or not. Opinions will change, conjecture will change - or not. As with Jeffrey Epstein, so it goes.
Pacifist Patriot
(24,653 posts)While statistics alone make it not at all surprising, serious questions remain.
That he was able to carry it out is what defies reason. Anyone familiar with the protocols involved with suicide prevention in detention facilities will understandably have questions. If on watch, how was it not prevented? If not on watch, why not given the circumstances and statistics?
US reps like Ted Lieu and Lois Frankel are hardly tinfoil hate wearing conspiracy theorists and they have expressed concerns.
I don't think he was murdered. I want to know why he was allowed to commit suicide.
Boomer
(4,168 posts)I have no doubt that Epstein was suicidal or that he finally succeeded in killing himself. That part is blatantly obvious.
What I want to know is how he managed to get OFF suicide watch. Who made that decision and why, given his recent history and the importance of him living long enough to go to trial. Then let's take a good close look at the bank accounts of the prison staff who made some really poor judgment calls.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)environment like jail? Why not outside any time in the past couple years when anyone might have done it?
And why no one else? No one'd be safer with Flynn, or Manafort, or, or, or...dead?
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)under circumstances that will lead the press, Congress, law enforcement and most of the public to raise questions within hours of the death is the smartest and most adept way to murder someone to keep him quiet and throw suspicion off of you.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)TomSlick
(11,098 posts)The problem is that we have reached a point the nothing - nothing - this administration says can be taken at face value. Just because Epstein was in a federal facility under the control of AG Barr and Barr quickly - before an autopsy or an investigation - said it was suicide doesn't mean it wasn't suicide. Then again, it doesn't mean that we can be confident that it was suicide. (Trump has re-tweeted that Bill Clinton had him killed - so apparently Trump isn't convinced that Barr is to be believed.)
We're in dark times when we immediately - and reasonably - suspect that our government is lying to us.
I wish that I had confidence that a complete investigation will occur. Unfortunately, the FBI is under Barr's control, so I cannot have that confidence.
Dark times, indeed.
lillypaddle
(9,580 posts)Lots of powerful people out there with lots of bucks. I don't trust anyone, even dead Epstein.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)Former MCC inmate: Theres no way Jeffrey Epstein killed himself
When youre on suicide watch, they put you in this white smock, a straight jacket. They know a person cannot be injurious to themselves.
The clothing they give you is a jump-in uniform. Everything is a dark brown color.
Could he have done it from the bed? No sir. Theres a steel frame, but you cant move it. Theres no light fixture. Theres no bars.
They dont give you enough in there that could successfully create an instrument of death. You want to write a letter, they give you rubber pens and maybe once a week a piece of paper.
Nothing hard or made of metal.
And theres a cop at the door about every nine minutes, whether youre on suicide watch or not
https://www.google.com/amp/s/nypost.com/2019/08/10/former-mcc-inmate-theres-no-way-jeffrey-epstein-killed-himself/amp/
The time he tried before he actually said it was an assault.
Crunchy Frog
(26,587 posts)It doesn't make sense to me that he would have been taken off suicide watch and close monitoring under the circumstances.
His death was too convenient to too many people for me to buy the "just a suicide" explanation.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,857 posts)People here are far too quick to jump to the nearest conspiracy. In another post on this topic someone darkly predicted that those who took him off suicide watch will be the next to go. Really?
There can be a serious lack of critical thinking on DU.
And yes, I'm certain the SOB offed himself rather than face what he did. On my FB page a friend who suffers from depression (and posts about it frequently) posted that he wasn't sure if Epstein didn't succumb to depression. I responded that he was most likely depressed because he'd finally been caught and that I had zero sympathy for him.
Just my take.
PandoraAwakened
(905 posts)"He had tried before." And yet, most stories on the incident from a few weeks earlier do note that Epstein himself repeatedly insisted he had been beaten up and that the finger marks around his neck were not his own. (BTW, hasn't science proven that it's actually impossible to choke oneself with your own hands? Has anyone here ever tried this trick themselves? Just curious.)
"He probably acted all normal and calm so he could be taken off suicide watch." Wasn't he taken off suicide watch because he was quite vociferously insisting that he had been attacked, and someone who actually understands how physiology works agreed that he couldn't have choked himself to near death?
So, I guess, in an odd and perverted way, the original post is correct, just not in the way the writer thought (exactly opposite, in fact), in that "sometimes things are just as they appear."
meadowlander
(4,395 posts)We have literally no evidence one way or the other.
It is interesting though how invested some people seem to be in arguing that it must be a suicide and that no foul play could possibly have been involved.
Is there good reason to think he was suicidal? Yes. Does that mean he wasn't "helped"? I don't know. But I would like to know why he was taken off suicide watch and why the cameras were "broken" and whether or not anything else suspicious was happening at the same time.
Being skeptical and asking reasonable questions isn't the same as brokering in conspiracy theories.
nolabear
(41,963 posts)Ill reserve opinion on what happened or what was really going on with him but when something that utterly narcissistic blows up in someones face a reaction like that isnt unimaginable at all.
I hear nothing about family, how they think he made his money, or anything else other than that madness about wealth and getting away with monstrous acts. Very odd.
not_the_one
(2,227 posts)Nothing is EVER as it seems...
and
There is no such thing as a coincidence.
Now, carry on.
BeckyDem
(8,361 posts)Also had been flagged for suicide. He was a coward and I suspect incompetence behind this....which is not conspiratorial on any level, more common than one might imagine.
Joe941
(2,848 posts)But the media bends over backwards to make excuses.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)As recently as three months ago, the guy was sitting on top of his world. Last week, he's in solitary confinement with little hope for anything better in his future.
I'd guess it's tough to go from a life of champagne and lobster to bologna sandwiches. Privilege is a difficult thing to say good-bye to.