Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Dennis Donovan

(26,701 posts)
Tue Jul 23, 2019, 05:47 PM Jul 2019

NYT - Neil Armstrong's Death, and a Stormy, Secret $6 Million Settlement

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/23/us/neil-armstrong-wrongful-death-settlement.html



By Scott Shane and Sarah Kliff
July 23, 2019

When Neil Armstrong died in a Cincinnati hospital two weeks after undergoing heart surgery in 2012, his family released a touching tribute addressing the astronaut’s millions of admirers around the globe.

“Honor his example of service, accomplishment and modesty,” they wrote, telling fans of the first man to walk on the moon that “the next time you walk outside on a clear night and see the moon smiling down at you, think of Neil Armstrong and give him a wink.”

But in private, the family’s reaction to his death at 82 was far stormier. His two sons contended that incompetent post-surgical care at Mercy Health – Fairfield Hospital had cost Mr. Armstrong his life, and even one expert retained by the hospital would find serious problems with his treatment.

The hospital defended the care, but paid the family $6 million to settle the matter privately and avoid devastating publicity, documents show. The hospital insisted on keeping the complaints and the settlement secret.

</snip>


Well, that's terrible to hear. If only he had lived to see the ceremonies the past week...
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NYT - Neil Armstrong's Death, and a Stormy, Secret $6 Million Settlement (Original Post) Dennis Donovan Jul 2019 OP
The words "Stormy" and "settlement" shouldn't appear so close together Blecht Jul 2019 #1
Me too. Thought I had missed something big. Hoyt Jul 2019 #2
Could've been the headline writer's intention. TexasProgresive Jul 2019 #3
And then, some troubling paragraphs question everything Jul 2019 #4
Why didn't the cardiologist remove the wires? Kid Berwyn Jul 2019 #5
God Bless America! hunter Jul 2019 #6

Blecht

(3,805 posts)
1. The words "Stormy" and "settlement" shouldn't appear so close together
Tue Jul 23, 2019, 05:50 PM
Jul 2019

Makes me think of only one thing.

:barf:

question everything

(48,964 posts)
4. And then, some troubling paragraphs
Wed Jul 24, 2019, 05:11 PM
Jul 2019

In a scorching July 2014 email to the hospital’s lawyers, Wendy R. Armstrong, a lawyer and the wife of Mr. Armstrong’s son Mark, noted that Mark and his brother, Rick, would soon be traveling to Florida to speak at a ceremony marking the 45th anniversary of the first moon landing.

“This event at Kennedy Space Center will receive national news coverage,” Wendy Armstrong wrote. “Rick and Mark have been solicited by several book writers and filmmakers for ‘information about Neil that no one already knows.’” The lawyer suggested that unless the parties reached a quick settlement, the hospital would be publicly criticized for giving lethally flawed care to one of America’s most famous and revered public figures.

The legal settlement adds a grim footnote to the inspiring story of Mr. Armstrong, who avoided the limelight and never cashed in on his fame.

And a different lawyer for the grandchildren?

A lawyer acting as a representative of Mr. Armstrong’s grandchildren in the secret proceedings, Bertha G. Helmick, vividly characterized the stakes for the hospital in a filing in probate court in Hamilton County, Ohio, where Mr. Armstrong lived.

Ms. Helmick noted that the settlement could be undone, and her young clients would lose their share of the money, if the agreement’s terms ever came to light. “If the existence of the wrongful death action and settlement are ever revealed by the parties to the agreement, the entire payment must be repaid in full,” she wrote. (The Times does not have the full settlement agreement.)

His widow, Carol, who was Mr. Armstrong’s second wife, did not participate in the settlement. “I wasn’t part of it,” she said in an interview. “I want that for the record.” When a reporter noted that she had signed off on the settlement in her role as executor of the estate, she replied, “I had no choice — it was either that or lose my job as executor.” Asked if that meant she had not approved of the claim against the hospital, she said, “I don’t think I can answer that,” saying she was subject to a confidentiality agreement.

And, yes, the hospital was negligent

Mr. Armstrong had undergone bypass surgery in early August 2012, and his wife told The Associated Press afterward that he was “amazingly resilient” and was walking in the corridor. But when nurses removed the wires for a temporary pacemaker, he began to bleed into the membrane surrounding the heart, leading to a cascade of problems that resulted in his death on Aug. 25.

But when a nurse removed those wires, Mr. Armstrong began to bleed internally and his blood pressure dropped. Doctors took him to the hospital’s catheterization lab, where an echocardiogram showed, in one expert’s words, “significant and rapid bleeding.” There, doctors drained some blood from his heart, to prevent it from being pressed and hampered by the accumulated fluid.

Mr. Armstrong was then moved from the catheterization lab to an operating room. The records do not make clear what doctors may have done there, but he appears to have lingered for a week or longer before dying on Aug. 25. His family announced at the time that the cause of death was “complications resulting from cardiovascular procedures.”

The expert reviews focus on the hospital’s decision to bring Mr. Armstrong to a catheterization lab rather than directly to an operating room when he began to experience complications. “The decision to go to the cath lab was THE major error,” Dr. Joseph Bavaria, a vice-chair of cardiothoracic surgery at University of Pennsylvania wrote in a review conducted at the request of the Armstrong family.

Kid Berwyn

(18,170 posts)
5. Why didn't the cardiologist remove the wires?
Wed Jul 24, 2019, 05:35 PM
Jul 2019

Not that nurses aren’t capable, it’s just that the physician should oversee personally each part and aspect of treatment. If, in the doc’s estimation, the other caregivers could handle “taking out wires,” fine. That’s how he or she doctors. In addition, given the state of microbes at hospitals, I’d fear the possibility of post op infectionso and take all steps to minimize exposure.

This news is all really sad.

hunter

(39,001 posts)
6. God Bless America!
Wed Jul 24, 2019, 06:01 PM
Jul 2019

There are so many issues here I'm often speechless.

I could write three scalding essays about U.S. American Exceptionalism in response, about our medicine (no, ours is not the best), about our legal system (no, ours is not the best), and one about manned space exploration beyond low earth orbit (no, it's a bad idea.)

Nevertheless, I am tangled up in all three.

My wife and I have enjoyed many hours these past nine days reliving Apollo 11 as it happened fifty years ago -- watching the launch, watching Armstrong and Aldrin walk on the moon, watching the splashdown this morning, and recounting all the dramas in between.

Armstrong had faith in the American dream, as fantastical as that was, look at all those white guys smoking cigars and waving flags in Mission Control, but he had one hell of a ride.

We are all test pilots of our own lives, but he was one of the greats.

In the end we all crash and burn.



Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NYT - Neil Armstrong's De...