Legal expert's devastating side-by-side comparison of Barr and Mueller statements shows exactly how
the AG did Trumps bidding
When Robert Mueller spoke before reporters last Wednesday (yes, its only been a week), the special counsel iterated key sections of his report that appeared to undermine the narrative offered by Attorney General William Barr during his press conference last month.
Wednesday, the national security law and policy blog Just Security published a side-by-side chart comparing statements made by Barr and Mueller, and provided corresponding analysis about the statements differences. As described by Just Security co-editor-in-chief and former special counsel to the general counsel of the Department of Defense Ryan Goodman, some of the differences involve near complete contradictions, while others are more a matter of emphasis or tone. The analysis focuses on Muellers public statement (not the full report), compared with Barrs 4-page summary of the report and corresponding press conference on April 18, as well as the attorney generals three congressional hearings.
The analysis details 10 areas where Mueller and Barr differed in their public statements, including evidence of conspiracy, referral to Congress and whether obstruction is a crime. For example, while Mueller told reporters last week that there was insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy, Barr claimed the president was falsely accused of a crime, that there was no collusion and that Russian operatives did not have the cooperation of Trump or his campaign.
https://www.scribd.com/document/412477974/Chart-A-Side-by-Side-Comparison-of-Barr-s-vs-Mueller-s-Statements-About-Special-Counsel-Report-on-2016-Russian-Election-Interference#from_embed
[link:
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/06/legal-experts-devastating-side-by-side-comparison-of-barr-and-mueller-statements-shows-exactly-how-the-ag-did-trumps-bidding/|
Fact based analysis for what you already know is true