General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAJT
(5,240 posts)Then it would be 12 old, white, male, rich sociopaths.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)There will always be at least one white wing racist to hold out for their boy.
BigmanPigman
(51,649 posts)I swear I will be impartial and will do so on a stack of bibles.
*Did I mention that I'm an atheist.
abqtommy
(14,118 posts)for grand jury discovery that impeachment does. Please pay attention!
Me.
(35,454 posts)and we may never see that grand jury testimony unless a judge says so and you may not have noticed but he is stacking the courts. But an indictment after he leaves office will have a grand jury all its own. And frankly, removing him from office just isn't enough. I want him removed from society altogether as well as from his money.
TwilightZone
(25,512 posts)A judge's ruling in a trial might be more predictable (legal precedent, understanding of the law, and all that), but we'd run the risk of getting an activist judge.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)shanny
(6,709 posts)lower standard of proof I think (preponderance of evidence) and verdict doesn't need to be unanimous