What the Kremlin thinks about the democratic presidential candidates:
Tulsi Gabbard:
* She likes Bernie, she's not beholden to party-politics and she rattles the establishment.
https://www.rt.com/usa/448623-gabbard-tulsi-running-president/
* She's anti-war, anti-interventionist, and she has rattled the "mainstream-left" with her fact-finding mission in Syria where she talked to Assad.
https://www.rt.com/usa/445503-gabbard-presidency-run-2020/
* She's a victim of anti-Hindu bigotry and the left-leaning mainstream-media.
https://www.rt.com/usa/449916-gabbard-bigotry-hindu-reaction/
* She's being unfairly attacked by the mainstream-media, the Democrats and the Republicans.
https://www.rt.com/usa/448809-tulsi-gabbard-gay-marriage/
* Her opponents label her as shill for Assad and Putin, which can only mean that her opponents are hysterical.
https://www.rt.com/usa/448632-tulsi-gabbard-negative-reactions/
Kamala Harris:
* She has upsides and downsides.
https://www.rt.com/usa/449355-kamala-harris-announces-presidential-run/
* Her fans are worried that Russia might interfere with her campaign, which means that her fans are hysterical.
https://www.rt.com/usa/449449-kamala-harris-russian-bots/
* She has upsides and downsides.
https://www.rt.com/usa/450191-cnn-ratings-record-fail/
Elizabeth Warren:
* Conservatives joke about her, so how serious could she actually be as a candidate? She's the bane of billionaires, but she didn't support Bernie, which means she's not really a progressive. And one of her Senate-votes contradicted that one speech that one time.
https://www.rt.com/usa/447839-elizabeth-warren-president-twitter/
* Policies? Pfft. Let's rather talk about how her campaign struggles with the neverending controversy about her native heritage and that DNA-test. She has so much baggage as a candidate!
https://www.rt.com/usa/448169-warren-dna-test-question/
Kirsten Gillibrand:
* No articles yet.
Cory Booker:
* No articles yet.
Beto O'Rourke:
* No articles yet.
