General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA friend's daughter was convicted after leaving food and water in desert for migrants
Brave women.. This is insane..
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/jan/19/arizona-four-women-convicted-after-leaving-food-and-water-in-desert-for-migrants?CMP=share_btn_fb
Arizona: Four women convicted after leaving food and water in desert for migrants
Federal judge finds activists guilty of entering a national wildlife refuge without a permit to give aid to migrants
Associated Press
Sat 19 Jan 2019 00.29 EST
A federal judge has found four women guilty of entering a national wildlife refuge without a permit as they sought to place food and water in the Arizona desert for migrants.
US magistrate Judge Bernardo Velascos ruling on Friday marked the first conviction against humanitarian aid volunteers in a decade.
The four found guilty of misdemeanours in the recent case were volunteers for No More Deaths, which said in a statement the group had been providing life-saving aid to migrants.
The volunteers include Natalie Hoffman, Oona Holcomb, Madeline Huse and Zaachila Orozco-McCormick.
Hoffman was found guilty of operating a vehicle inside Cabeza Prieta national wildlife refuge, entering the federally protected area without a permit, and leaving water jugs and cans of beans there in August 2017.
The others were found guilty of entering without a permit and leaving behind personal property.A friends daughter
Judi Lynn
(160,746 posts)raccoon
(31,151 posts)malaise
(269,498 posts)Akacia
(583 posts)people helping other human beings survive is criminalized.
dewsgirl
(14,961 posts)renate
(13,776 posts)And rightly so. What a kind, compassionate, brave thing to do.
NickB79
(19,310 posts)Laws like this have been a cornerstone of the environmental movement for decades. And I don't see how you can keep protecting fragile desert habitat without such laws in place. It sounds like, from a legal standpoint, the prosecution had them dead-to-rights and they really had no defense other that their hearts being in the right place. Morally, they were innocent. Legally, they were guilty
Does a judge have discretion in such a situation to void the charges, or does he only have the discretion to give them the minimum punishment? A symbolic $1 fine?
MagickMuffin
(16,003 posts)And these goober-noggins had weapons to boot.
These four brave women only had food.
Lefta Dissenter
(6,623 posts)eppur_se_muova
(36,319 posts)BSdetect
(9,001 posts)theophilus
(3,750 posts)greatly praised. This young lady is a great person and, I am sure, a great inspiration to those around her.
catrose
(5,080 posts)Donate to their group?
G_j
(40,372 posts)ATTORNEYS FOR A border-based humanitarian aid volunteer facing two decades in prison are calling for the removal of the magistrate judge in the case after learning that the judge engaged in secret communications with Trump administration prosecutors, leading the veteran jurist to walk back a critical order in the high-profile case.
On Wednesday, lawyers for Scott Warren, a resident of Ajo, Arizona, facing federal felony charges for providing aid to undocumented migrants, said Bernardo Velasco, a magistrate judge at the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, pared back an order he issued in November calling for the release of communications sent to Border Patrol agents responsible for Warrens arrest after engaging in unacceptable conversations with government attorneys prosecuting the case.
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.