Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Roland99

(53,342 posts)
Sun Jan 13, 2019, 12:03 AM Jan 2019

On Executive Privilege...

UNITED STATES v. NIXON(1974)
No. 73-1766

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/418/683.html

On the other hand, the allowance of the privilege to withhold evidence that is demonstrably relevant in a criminal trial would cut deeply into the guarantee of due process of law and gravely impair the basic function of the courts. A President's acknowledged need for confidentiality [418 U.S. 683, 713] in the communications of his office is general in nature, whereas the constitutional need for production of relevant evidence in a criminal proceeding is specific and central to the fair adjudication of a particular criminal case in the administration of justice. Without access to specific facts a criminal prosecution may be totally frustrated. The President's broad interest in confidentiality of communications will not be vitiated by disclosure of a limited number of conversations preliminarily shown to have some bearing on the pending criminal cases.

We conclude that when the ground for asserting privilege as to subpoenaed materials sought for use in a criminal trial is based only on the generalized interest in confidentiality, it cannot prevail over the fundamental demands of due process of law in the fair administration of criminal justice. The generalized assertion of privilege must yield to the demonstrated, specific need for evidence in a pending criminal trial.
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

elleng

(131,600 posts)
1. 'The generalized assertion of privilege must yield
Sun Jan 13, 2019, 12:05 AM
Jan 2019

to the demonstrated, specific need for evidence in a pending criminal trial.'

brush

(54,000 posts)
3. And not just for evidence in a criminal trial but for intel reasons and preservation of the...
Sun Jan 13, 2019, 12:16 AM
Jan 2019

historical record. We don't know what the fu_ck was discussed in meetings with top officials from adversarial nations.

Our intelligence services don't know if trump sold out the country because he kept everything secret and off limits to our media and he seized interpreters notes.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»On Executive Privilege...