Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Wed Aug 15, 2018, 05:45 PM Aug 2018

A FREE PRESS NEEDS YOU - By The NYT Editorial Board (first of the 200 edits scheduled for tomorrow)

AUG. 15, 2018

In 1787, the year the Constitution was adopted, Thomas Jefferson famously wrote to a friend, “Were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers, or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter.”

That’s how he felt before he became president, anyway. Twenty years later, after enduring the oversight of the press from inside the White House, he was less sure of its value. “Nothing can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper,” he wrote. “Truth itself becomes suspicious by being put into that polluted vehicle.”

Jefferson’s discomfort was, and remains, understandable. Reporting the news in an open society is an enterprise laced with conflict. His discomfort also illustrates the need for the right he helped enshrine. As the founders believed from their own experience, a well-informed public is best equipped to root out corruption and, over the long haul, promote liberty and justice.

“Public discussion is a political duty,” the Supreme Court said in 1964. That discussion must be “uninhibited, robust, and wide-open,” and “may well include vehement, caustic and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials.”

In 2018, some of the most damaging attacks are coming from government officials. Criticizing the news media — for underplaying or overplaying stories, for getting something wrong — is entirely right. News reporters and editors are human, and make mistakes. Correcting them is core to our job. But insisting that truths you don’t like are “fake news” is dangerous to the lifeblood of democracy. And calling journalists the “enemy of the people” is dangerous, period.

These attacks on the press are particularly threatening to journalists in nations with a less secure rule of law and to smaller publications in the United States, already buffeted by the industry’s economic crisis. And yet the journalists at those papers continue to do the hard work of asking questions and telling the stories that you otherwise wouldn’t hear. Consider The San Luis Obispo Tribune, which wrote about the death of a jail inmate who was restrained for 46 hours. The account forced the county to change how it treats mentally ill prisoners.

Answering a call last week from The Boston Globe, The Times is joining hundreds of newspapers, from large metro-area dailies to small local weeklies, to remind readers of the value of America’s free press. These editorials, some of which we’ve excerpted, together affirm a fundamental American institution.

If you haven’t already, please subscribe to your local papers. Praise them when you think they’ve done a good job and criticize them when you think they could do better. We’re all in this together.

###

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/08/15/opinion/editorials/free-press-local-journalism-news-donald-trump.html

If you are able to go to the NYT, get past the pay-wall, scroll down to the bottom of the Editorial, you can pick a state you want to see an editorial from. All of the newspapers running this type editorial will be listed.

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A FREE PRESS NEEDS YOU - By The NYT Editorial Board (first of the 200 edits scheduled for tomorrow) (Original Post) DonViejo Aug 2018 OP
K&R Scurrilous Aug 2018 #1
A FREE PRESS NEEDS YOU. elleng Aug 2018 #2
K&R! mcar Aug 2018 #3
Is this the same New York Times who helped lead us into war in Iraq? Ron Green Aug 2018 #4
Yeah, it is. Feel better now? DonViejo Aug 2018 #5
Thank you for the OP. See my reply #8 just below. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Aug 2018 #9
Purism leads to powerlessness. The perfect is the enemy of the good. What-about-ism suffocation. Bernardo de La Paz Aug 2018 #8
For what it's worth, many libraries offer New York Times digital edition... hunter Aug 2018 #6
The Wash Post won't take part in this BigmanPigman Aug 2018 #7

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,001 posts)
8. Purism leads to powerlessness. The perfect is the enemy of the good. What-about-ism suffocation.
Wed Aug 15, 2018, 08:51 PM
Aug 2018

Everytime somebody says something good or does something good, there is always a naysayer who pops up and says "What about this awful thing that happened? They are forever tainted and I won't listen and they can do no good. Cover my ears. La-la-la-la-la"

Such what-about-ism is the suffocation and strangulation of important messages that need to be heard, such as the OP editorial.

hunter

(38,311 posts)
6. For what it's worth, many libraries offer New York Times digital edition...
Wed Aug 15, 2018, 06:17 PM
Aug 2018

...with a library card.

Check it out. You may not have to spend money you don't have on a subscription, or skulk around in incognito windows.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A FREE PRESS NEEDS YOU - ...