General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Green Party didn't cost the Dems this election...
The margin is 1,754 for Balderson - more than the total votes votes that went to the Green Party candidate (1,127).
Even if that weren't the case, though, it's not a solid narrative, IMO, to blame the Green Party. I say this not to dismiss the idea that the Green Party actively works against the Democratic Party, but to not overuse this narrative, especially when it's not statistically the appropriate time.
Even if the Green Party's vote total was more than the eventual margin Balderson had on OConnor, that still doesn't mean the Green Party would have cost him the race. I say this definitively because the share of the vote they bring to the table is minuscule.
Beyond that, it's naive, or ignorant, to believe every single one of those 1,127 votes would have gone to O'Connor - let alone even cast their vote if the Green Party didn't exist.
Hell, you could make the case many of those voters probably wouldn't have voted at all if the Green Party wasn't on the ballot, since if a close, statistically tied race wasn't enough to drive 'em to O'Connor, I doubt the lack of Green Party would have driven them to the polls to vote for him anyway.
But let's assume 75% of those who voted Green Party still showed up to vote in this election. 75% of 1,127 is just 845 people. Now I promise you, not all of those 845 people would have voted for O'Connor. So, let's assume 80% voted for O'Connor and 20% voted for Balderson. That's just 676 people - and that's being generous with the idea that 75% of those voters would have voted anyway.
The Green Party didn't cost the Democrats this seat. The fact it was an ultra-conservative district that no Democrat has held since 1983, is what got 'em. But maybe in November they'll get payback.
Had the Green Party received the same amount of support as they did in 2016 (13,474), then maybe you'd have a point...but they were totally insignificant in this race. Don't lose sight of the gains and continue to focus on the gaps.
joshcryer
(62,270 posts)But still. Fuck the Green Party.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Glamrock
(11,800 posts)That's a favorite scapegoat!
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,615 posts)Your reasonable voice is needed, tonight especially.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)I'd say it's all but certain that most of them simply wouldn't have voted at all.
LandOfHopeAndDreams
(872 posts)Because a large percentage of Registered Democratic voters did not take the 5 minutes it would have required, to complete an absentee ballot, or the 15 minutes it would have taken to vote in person.
I'm guessing far more than 1,700 Registered Democrats couldn't care less apparently.
progressoid
(49,990 posts)Quemado
(1,262 posts)Nt
oasis
(49,383 posts)---Eldridge Cleaver
RestoreAmerica2020
(3,435 posts)Last edited Wed Aug 8, 2018, 02:28 AM - Edit history (1)
...vote republican? Am I missing something about green party members, voters ?
[Wikipedia]
What are the basic beliefs of the Green Party?
Ten Key Values
Grassroots Democracy.
Social Justice And Equal Opportunity.
Ecological Wisdom.
Non-Violence.
Decentralization.
Community-Based Economics.
Feminism And Gender Equity.
Respect For Diversity.
GregD
(2,263 posts)Look here:
https://www.thegreenpapers.com/G16/OH
use your browser "find" for "112,638"
Democratic 112,638 29.84%
What could it possibly take to get the damn voters off their asses and out to the polls? Are things not bad enough? If they do this in November we are fucked.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)Response to GregD (Reply #11)
SunSeeker This message was self-deleted by its author.
uponit7771
(90,336 posts)LeftInTX
(25,322 posts)It was confusion on the butterfly ballot in Palm Beach County and Pat Buchanan.
Pat Buchanan got a bunch of votes in Palm Beach County and he claims that all those people could not have voted for him and that they were Gore voters.
dembotoz
(16,804 posts)U can not scream if the greens screw up ours
JI7
(89,249 posts)when they do.
dembotoz
(16,804 posts)JI7
(89,249 posts)if a voter wants republicans to win, the voter votes for the republican, not for somebody else
dembotoz
(16,804 posts)Raine
(30,540 posts)for using reason over blame..
genxlib
(5,526 posts)You are probably right that some portion of them would stay home and that some portion would not vote Democratic.
That still makes those people part of the problem. Doing either of those things is still contrary to their stated goals and very unhelpful in actually moving forward.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)It uses statistics to come to a point that has a much larger human element.
This completely ignores the Green Party campaign and how it influences individuals to stay home, vote for Republicans, and the GP candidate.
Severely flawed argument void of major metrics in order to make a preconceived point.
Vinca
(50,271 posts)it is possible the Green Party could have pushed the election one way or the other. I don't know why people can't figure it out. Ours is not a form of government that is conducive to more than 2 parties. I wish it was, but all a third party does is unwittingly put people like Trump in office.
Tom Rinaldo
(22,912 posts)Some people intentionally vote simply to be different, just like some people pick clothes for that reason. Some people are wedded to associating with outsiders, it fits their self identity. People have all kinds of reasons for voting the way they do, some principled others not so much. I have no doubt that many of the Green voters in that district would have voted Democratic if there had been no Green candidate, but not all of them would have.My guess, like yours, is a lot would not have voted. Or they would have found a different means to reject the main party choices, write in votes for example.
If they listened to me, of course, they wouldn't.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)I have a couple friends from high school who will, under no circumstance, vote Democratic. Ever. They wouldn't have even voted Bernie had he won the nomination because the Democratic Party, in their mind, is the Establishment regardless and it goes against their personal code, I guess, to ever support a Democrat. No amount of reasoning, and no amount of competitiveness in the race, will change their mind.
I try reasoning with them but they're wholly anti-establishment and that means voting against the two parties every single time for every single race ... or they abstain from voting if there isn't an option to do so.
bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)and nuance is typically FROWNED UPON in this establishment!!
K&R.
Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,412 posts)Who doesn't know that by now? And if they voted Republican or stayed home and didn't vote instead of voting for the Democrat, they aren't real progressives JMHO.
stonecutter357
(12,697 posts)Initech
(100,075 posts)We can't get too worked up about a damn primary election! You'd have to hold people at gun point to get them to vote in the primaries and if we argue too much about who voted for who, that Blue Wave won't happen in November. It's the primaries - nobody votes in these elections, and that's a huge part of why our electorate is so fucked up. As Will Ferrell said in the movie Old School - we got to keep our composure! We can't have anyone freaking out here!