Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,696 posts)
Mon Jul 30, 2018, 04:41 PM Jul 2018

This message was self-deleted by its author

This message was self-deleted by its author (applegrove) on Mon Jul 30, 2018, 10:01 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This message was self-deleted by its author (Original Post) applegrove Jul 2018 OP
i wonder how much it saves their company in employer-provided coverage 0rganism Jul 2018 #1
We pay for employer backed programs, too, in lower wages. I love my socialist single payer health .. marble falls Jul 2018 #5
Also, Koch held back on his companies' ROI 'til a Republican prez needed increased votes to keep ancianita Jul 2018 #17
We pay for our healthcare in Canada with a sales tax: send your teen to the mall applegrove Jul 2018 #2
The US used to have a "luxury tax" SoCalDem Jul 2018 #4
That's a lower tax rate than in my US city catrose Jul 2018 #7
Lower than my sales tax too,by a small margin and yeah,not health care comes from it. Bengus81 Jul 2018 #10
Oh we have provincial sales tax too. It ads up to 15% or so. applegrove Jul 2018 #12
All together with provincial sales tax we pay 15%. Poor people get money back every quarter. applegrove Jul 2018 #13
Here's a better plan jayschool2013 Jul 2018 #8
The only problem with Medicare-for-All is that so many people are too stupid to understand Hoyt Jul 2018 #3
Someone explain which article is correct Liberalagogo Jul 2018 #6
They say the same thing but one forgets to mention the actual costs over 10 years Joe Nation Jul 2018 #9
The article at the link goes into more detail, not just showcasing the $32.6 figure pazzyanne Jul 2018 #11
Thanks for explaining. applegrove Jul 2018 #14
K&R smirkymonkey Jul 2018 #15
Yep, but more people see the ABC story on this than the Think Progress story. SunSeeker Jul 2018 #16

0rganism

(23,957 posts)
1. i wonder how much it saves their company in employer-provided coverage
Mon Jul 30, 2018, 04:43 PM
Jul 2018

their ROI has to be significant or they wouldn't move in this direction

marble falls

(57,106 posts)
5. We pay for employer backed programs, too, in lower wages. I love my socialist single payer health ..
Mon Jul 30, 2018, 05:06 PM
Jul 2018

care program with the VA.

ancianita

(36,095 posts)
17. Also, Koch held back on his companies' ROI 'til a Republican prez needed increased votes to keep
Mon Jul 30, 2018, 07:26 PM
Jul 2018

their majority party's (in govt.) minority rule (EC technicalities) after November's shaky election.

When you fear a big voter turnout against your party, it's time to pivot to playing "the good party" to win elections. That's when people will forgive and forget Republicans have been consistently up to no good for anyone. Republicans never write good policy, foreign or domestic, but will steal every good idea from their opponents when they can't cheat their way into a win.

If they bring such a Medicare For All bill to a vote, don't be surprised to see them raid Social Security afterward, since present medicare comes out of, and is run by Social Security.

applegrove

(118,696 posts)
2. We pay for our healthcare in Canada with a sales tax: send your teen to the mall
Mon Jul 30, 2018, 04:43 PM
Jul 2018

with $100, $7 goes to the government. We pay sales tax on non necessities like haircuts, restaurants, clothes, decor. And it works.

SoCalDem

(103,856 posts)
4. The US used to have a "luxury tax"
Mon Jul 30, 2018, 04:58 PM
Jul 2018

My aunt had a clothing boutique, and everything we sold had a 10% tax, plus the state sales tax
Anything that was not a necessity was considered a "luxury"..

catrose

(5,068 posts)
7. That's a lower tax rate than in my US city
Mon Jul 30, 2018, 06:02 PM
Jul 2018

And sadly does not include health care

Bengus81

(6,931 posts)
10. Lower than my sales tax too,by a small margin and yeah,not health care comes from it.
Mon Jul 30, 2018, 06:24 PM
Jul 2018

applegrove

(118,696 posts)
12. Oh we have provincial sales tax too. It ads up to 15% or so.
Mon Jul 30, 2018, 06:40 PM
Jul 2018

applegrove

(118,696 posts)
13. All together with provincial sales tax we pay 15%. Poor people get money back every quarter.
Mon Jul 30, 2018, 06:41 PM
Jul 2018

jayschool2013

(2,312 posts)
8. Here's a better plan
Mon Jul 30, 2018, 06:20 PM
Jul 2018

Send your teen to the mall with $50.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
3. The only problem with Medicare-for-All is that so many people are too stupid to understand
Mon Jul 30, 2018, 04:51 PM
Jul 2018

the sizable increase in taxes will actually save them money by offsetting/reducing costs they are paying otherwise. And, there are a lot of white wingers -- mostly -- who don't want any portion of "their" taxes going to others. They'd rather sit around smoking, eating cruddy food, and guzzling beer, without decent health coverage, than develop a system that can improve everyone's lives.

I really believe a Public Option for people to buy into Medicare is the only way to go. Otherwise, those opposed to Medicare-for-all will impede enactment, as they have done for decades. At least with a public option, if it is as good as we think, most people will gravitate toward it quickly. Then, the ignorant might come around.

 

Liberalagogo

(1,770 posts)
6. Someone explain which article is correct
Mon Jul 30, 2018, 06:02 PM
Jul 2018

as they say 2 opposite things:

this thread....

or this one:

Study: 'Medicare for all' projected to cost $32.6 trillion

https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=10942111

It's the SAME study...what am I not getting?

Joe Nation

(963 posts)
9. They say the same thing but one forgets to mention the actual costs over 10 years
Mon Jul 30, 2018, 06:22 PM
Jul 2018

pazzyanne

(6,556 posts)
11. The article at the link goes into more detail, not just showcasing the $32.6 figure
Mon Jul 30, 2018, 06:31 PM
Jul 2018

"Federal health expenditures refer to health spending from the federal government in particular. Since the federal government takes on nearly all health spending under Medicare for All, federal health expenditures will necessarily go up a lot, $32.6 trillion over the ten-year period according to Blahous. But this is more of an accounting thing than anything else: rather than paying premiums, deductibles, and co-pays for health care, people will instead pay a tax that is, on average, a bit less than they currently pay into the health care system and, for those on lower incomes, a lot less."

https://jacobinmag.com/2018/07/medicare-for-all-mercatus-center-report

applegrove

(118,696 posts)
14. Thanks for explaining.
Mon Jul 30, 2018, 06:42 PM
Jul 2018
 

smirkymonkey

(63,221 posts)
15. K&R
Mon Jul 30, 2018, 06:52 PM
Jul 2018

SunSeeker

(51,574 posts)
16. Yep, but more people see the ABC story on this than the Think Progress story.
Mon Jul 30, 2018, 07:24 PM
Jul 2018

And ABC's headline was the eye-popping costs. https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/study-medicare-bill-estimated-326-trillion-56906940 Because that's what gets the clicks. So we need to be able to address this and not shy away from the fact that raising taxes, even by a lot (e.g., most people's federal income tax bill will double), to pay for single payer is still worth it and saves people money overall.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...