General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis message was self-deleted by its author
This message was self-deleted by its author (applegrove) on Mon Jul 30, 2018, 10:01 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.
0rganism
(23,957 posts)their ROI has to be significant or they wouldn't move in this direction
marble falls
(57,106 posts)care program with the VA.
ancianita
(36,095 posts)their majority party's (in govt.) minority rule (EC technicalities) after November's shaky election.
When you fear a big voter turnout against your party, it's time to pivot to playing "the good party" to win elections. That's when people will forgive and forget Republicans have been consistently up to no good for anyone. Republicans never write good policy, foreign or domestic, but will steal every good idea from their opponents when they can't cheat their way into a win.
If they bring such a Medicare For All bill to a vote, don't be surprised to see them raid Social Security afterward, since present medicare comes out of, and is run by Social Security.
applegrove
(118,696 posts)with $100, $7 goes to the government. We pay sales tax on non necessities like haircuts, restaurants, clothes, decor. And it works.
SoCalDem
(103,856 posts)My aunt had a clothing boutique, and everything we sold had a 10% tax, plus the state sales tax
Anything that was not a necessity was considered a "luxury"..
catrose
(5,068 posts)And sadly does not include health care
Bengus81
(6,931 posts)applegrove
(118,696 posts)applegrove
(118,696 posts)jayschool2013
(2,312 posts)Send your teen to the mall with $50.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)the sizable increase in taxes will actually save them money by offsetting/reducing costs they are paying otherwise. And, there are a lot of white wingers -- mostly -- who don't want any portion of "their" taxes going to others. They'd rather sit around smoking, eating cruddy food, and guzzling beer, without decent health coverage, than develop a system that can improve everyone's lives.
I really believe a Public Option for people to buy into Medicare is the only way to go. Otherwise, those opposed to Medicare-for-all will impede enactment, as they have done for decades. At least with a public option, if it is as good as we think, most people will gravitate toward it quickly. Then, the ignorant might come around.
Liberalagogo
(1,770 posts)as they say 2 opposite things:
this thread....
or this one:
Study: 'Medicare for all' projected to cost $32.6 trillion
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=10942111
It's the SAME study...what am I not getting?
Joe Nation
(963 posts)pazzyanne
(6,556 posts)"Federal health expenditures refer to health spending from the federal government in particular. Since the federal government takes on nearly all health spending under Medicare for All, federal health expenditures will necessarily go up a lot, $32.6 trillion over the ten-year period according to Blahous. But this is more of an accounting thing than anything else: rather than paying premiums, deductibles, and co-pays for health care, people will instead pay a tax that is, on average, a bit less than they currently pay into the health care system and, for those on lower incomes, a lot less."
https://jacobinmag.com/2018/07/medicare-for-all-mercatus-center-report
applegrove
(118,696 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)SunSeeker
(51,574 posts)And ABC's headline was the eye-popping costs. https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/study-medicare-bill-estimated-326-trillion-56906940 Because that's what gets the clicks. So we need to be able to address this and not shy away from the fact that raising taxes, even by a lot (e.g., most people's federal income tax bill will double), to pay for single payer is still worth it and saves people money overall.