Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

madamesilverspurs

(15,801 posts)
Mon Jul 23, 2012, 10:47 PM Jul 2012

Words are failing. . .

This showed up on my facebook page. It's probably one of the most inane things I've ever had the misfortune to read. That said, how do I possibly respond to it in a fashion that's comprehensible to the person who posted the thing? Ye gods.




-

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Tuesday Afternoon

(56,912 posts)
3. since when is poverty comfortable? regardless of how one acquires it, still sucks. -
Mon Jul 23, 2012, 10:50 PM
Jul 2012

poverty created welfare NOT the other way around.

what a piss poor load of crap.

rustydog

(9,186 posts)
6. This post is 100 percent correct. Corporations are people my friend
Mon Jul 23, 2012, 10:59 PM
Jul 2012

They get billions in incentives and they rspond to those by attacking the poor.

Tsiyu

(18,186 posts)
7. Let me guess how they choose to "focus"
Mon Jul 23, 2012, 11:08 PM
Jul 2012

"Cut taxes for the wealthy, so they can hoard more cash and send us further into the poverty hole...I mean...so that they'll create jobs. Yeah. That's it!"

hay rick

(7,611 posts)
9. Pray that they lose their job and get first-hand knowledge of poverty.
Mon Jul 23, 2012, 11:14 PM
Jul 2012

Worst-case scenario: you learn something about the power of prayer.

HughBeaumont

(24,461 posts)
10. AH, Republitarians . . . .
Mon Jul 23, 2012, 11:23 PM
Jul 2012

. . . . the only people who can make rhyme or reason out of the assertion that the working/unemployed poor will be "motivated by lower wages to work harder and harder and maybe get a second job so they can get out of their bad situation", while at the same time stating "If you raised taxes on the rich, why should they be motivated to reinvest in their businesses and create more jobs if the gubmint's just going to take their hard-earned wealth!?".

RedStateLiberal

(1,374 posts)
11. Turn it around on them!
Mon Jul 23, 2012, 11:32 PM
Jul 2012

If you pay people to stay rich,
then more people will stay poor.

Corporations are people who respond to incentives.

And that's why corporate welfare increases affluence -
it literally pays people to stay above the middle class.

SHARE if you think we should focus on
growing the middle class and not just
making affluence more "comfortable".

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Words are failing. . .