Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums4 fatal flaws in Paul Manaforts lawsuit claiming Mueller cant prosecute him
https://thinkprogress.org/four-fatal-flaws-in-paul-manaforts-lawsuit-claiming-mueller-cant-prosecute-him-d40e47e09611/1.
Ordinarily, when a criminal defendant wishes to challenge the legal basis for a prosecution against them, they raise that challenge over the course of their criminal trial. Manaforts attorneys, however, filed a separate civil suit asking a judge to enjoin Mueller from continuing this investigation and prosecution of Manafort. That, in and of itself, is a strange tactic which risks annoying the trial judge assigned to hear his criminal trial judges typically dont appreciate it when you go behind their back and there are legal doctrines in place that normally prevent the same matter from being litigated simultaneously before different judges.
2.
Manafort claims that the specific factual statement in Rosensteins order is not broad enough to capture Manaforts business dealings in Ukraine, and that a broadly worded provision of that order exceeds Rosensteins authority.
A glaring problem with this argument is that, even if Manafort is right, it is far from clear that he is allowed to bring this challenge. The regulations Manafort relies on explicitly state that they are not intended to, do not, and may not be relied upon to create any rights, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or equity, by any person or entity, in any matter, civil, criminal, or administrative. So Manafort is claiming a right that the regulations explicitly deny him.
3.
But Manafort was indicted on charges arising out of his dealings with the Ukrainian government, not the Russians. Such an indictment, Manaforts lawyers claim, exceeds Muellers authority.
Its a dubious argument because Manafort wasnt just working for Ukrainian politicians and a Ukrainian political party. He was working for Ukraines pro-Russia party.
4.
So even if Muellers investigation into Manafort did exceed his original authority, Muellers only obligation was to consult with Rosenstein about his decision to expand the investigation. At this point, Rosenstein would either expand Muellers authority or assign the new matters to another prosecutor.
So even if Manaforts lawsuit prevails, the most that the former Trump campaign official can reasonably hope for is that a court may order Mueller to have a conversation with Rosenstein a conversation, by the way, that may have already happened.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 715 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
4 fatal flaws in Paul Manaforts lawsuit claiming Mueller cant prosecute him (Original Post)
DetlefK
Jan 2018
OP
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)1. The first one is pretty obvious
I can't think of a reason why the claim can't be raised in a preliminary motion in the criminal proceeding.
I don't know that it would "annoy" the criminal trial judge, but I would guess it would annoy the heck out of the judge that gets this one on his or her docket.