Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Political landscape of Canada (Ekos Poll - April 29)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
murphyj87 Donating Member (570 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 08:36 PM
Original message
Political landscape of Canada (Ekos Poll - April 29)
In what would have been unthinkable at the outset of this campaign, the Canadian political landscape is being profoundly reshaped in ways that are still unclear. What is clear is that Canadians are opting for dramatic change on May 2nd. The Conservatives remain stuck at 34.5 points, well short of the majority that they insisted was essential to ward off the adventure of an untested coalition. The NDP, who began the campaign at a scant 14 points, have now more than doubled their support and at 29.7% and are breathing down the necks of the stalled Conservative Party. The hapless Liberal Party, meanwhile, is in full collapse having achieved yet another historical nadir at 20.0%. A very soft Green Party is at 6.9% and is available for the picking. The Bloc Quebecois remains stuck at 26.2% in Quebec and will be dramatically humbled in the next Parliament.
While the Conservatives are hanging on to.

CPC=Conservative Party Of Canada
NDP=New Democratic Party
LPC=Liberal Party of Canada
BQ=Bloq Québecois



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Puzzler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Go Jack!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
digitaln3rd Donating Member (533 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. I like the NDP
Their success probably has a lot to do with the fact that the Liberals have a leader that's pretty much the Canadian equivalent of John Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canuckledragger Donating Member (124 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. honestly didn't hear much of anything..
..about Michael Ignatieff until the vote of no confidence of Stephen Harper. Then all of sudden he wants to be prime minister now & he's everywhere in the news.

I think the liberals dug their hole a long time ago, helped along by all the corruption & scandals lately. Almost as corrupt as the Conservatives!

Jack though, he's been right up front the whole time Harper's been in office, countering what he can.

Go Jack! lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. All I ask is that the neocons don't get a majority. Go Jack GO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Electric Monk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. The question still, though, is how that will affect the number of seats
which is the problem inherent in a First Past The Post system.

Proportional representation makes way more sense, imho. In that type of system the BQ and Green parties, which each have about the same % of votes nationally, would have the same number of seats. The way it is now allows a regional party, like the BQ, to have all their support in a small number of ridings, turning that into actual seats in Parliament, while the Green support is spread coast to coast, which is why the Greens have yet to even win a single seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC