Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sausage: literally and figuratively (new meat safety rules)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 11:14 PM
Original message
Sausage: literally and figuratively (new meat safety rules)
They say that law is like sausage: you don't want to see how either of them are made. I thought I'd take outside-of-the-beltway DU'ers on a tour.

I'm involved in a couple of steps of this legislation, which is lamentably imperfect, but better than what we have now. Here's what happened.

First, the story: http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/fs/food-diseas...

Now, despite whatever you think, large meat packers love safety regulations and always have, because the indies can't compete with them. This is essentially the last gasp of the independent packers/canners.

The big players here are AMI, the trade assoc for meat packers, and GIPSA, the sub-department of USDA that inspects meat (beef, chicken, canned seafood, and pork, but for some reason not goat. Don't ask me why). But both have somewhat split responsibilities, because both claim to represent small ranchers, canners, packers, and slaughterhouses. (AMI gets roughly 1/3rd of their funding from them; GIPSA/USDA have a statutory responsibility to represent them; neither of those are particularly easy to ignore.)

To oversimplify: during the Bush years, USDA told meat packers to come up with best practices that the whole industry should follow. Vilsack (head of the USDA) has basically said, "fine, those are good standards: come up with metrics for enforcing them." The industry screamed like 12-year-old girls who had their Justin Bieber tickets taken away, despite the fact that these were rules that they wrote.

Several ridiculous lobbying campaigns later, Vilsack stuck to his guns (because this was an explicit campaign promise by Obama). The best practices regulations will have the force of law. Industry will scream like stuck pigs but will mostly end up happier because smaller players will be squeezed out. And so it goes.

It's a shitty world we live in, and I have few illusions about that. These regulations are disappointing but are still better than what we have, despite all their flaws. Big players will make out like bandits, but will produce safer meat products. You can thank me or curse me as you prefer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC