Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WI - State will DEFY judge's order and implement anti-union law!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
katanalori Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 07:01 PM
Original message
WI - State will DEFY judge's order and implement anti-union law!
State will continue implementing collective bargaining law despite judge's order.

"State officials say they will move forward with Wisconsin's controversial collective bargaining law, despite a judge's order barring its implementation — and a threat of sanctions against anyone who violates it.

Department of Administration Secretary Mike Huebsch said he has a legal obligation to implement all laws that have been passed by the Legislature, signed by Gov. Scott Walker and "published into law."

(snip)

"Huebsch's comments raise questions about whether he or other state officials could be held in contempt of court after a hearing Tuesday, when Dane County Circuit Judge Maryann Sumi made it clear that any further implementation of the law is barred."

http://host.madison.com/wsj/news/local/govt-and-politics/article_195e7dd0-5b20-11e0-83bb-001cc4c002e0.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. This makes me uneasy
It's as if they think (or know) they can get away with this ... otherwise it is sheer insanity. I wouldn't dismiss either possibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iwishiwas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. They have come up with another claim..........
Whow!!

Huebsch pointed out that the DOA is not a party to the lawsuit, and the order "fails to state" the law is not in effect.

"It is unclear how she can issue an order binding non-parties to a case who have not had their day in court," he said in an email.

A Department of Justice official echoed those statements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #12
24. great.
we need a "hang me" icon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. As someone else here said on another thread: CONTEMPT OF COURT.
JAIL THEM.

I believe the judge has sufficient grounds by now. God knows judges have exercised the ability in the past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'd like to see handcuffs brought out...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abelenkpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. +1 nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Yes... The law is something they should up hold...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is going to get interesting. It reminds me of when Jeb
Edited on Wed Mar-30-11 07:06 PM by rzemanfl
had armed FDLE guys ready to confront armed Pinellas County Sheriffs and take Terri Schiavo's vegetative shell to a doctor to have the feeding tube re-inserted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaneQPublic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. Forget about recall, arrest the whole lot of them. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Agreed but,
who is going to do the arresting?

It's a Wisconsin issue and law enforcement works for the Executive Branch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Federal Marshals?...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. CITIZEN's ARREST!
Edited on Wed Mar-30-11 11:55 PM by eowyn_of_rohan
TAR AND FEATHER! (I mean it)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaneQPublic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-11 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #6
26. Who would do the arresting if Walker axe-murdered someone?
Presumably someone in the state would have the authority to slap some cuffs on the dude.

And now that he is in open defiance of the judge's ruling, you'd think the judge would have some means to intervene.

I know there's already a recall movement brewing in preparation for Walker after he passes the threshold of one year in office, but I'd think his present actions would warrant flat-out impeachment, if the WI constitution has provisions for such a thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
socialist_n_TN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. OK here's the deal. I've talked to some Wisconsinites
on here who don't want a general strike because some part of that law says they can fire workers who engage in a strike. Well what about now? Obviously, this law has NOT been legally finalized. IF you struck NOW, you wouldn't be in violation of the law BECAUSE A JUDGE SAYS THE LAW IS NOT VALID!

Guys, y'all are going to have to get tough with these fuckers. THEY ARE IGNORING LEGAL PRECEDENT right and left. Even if you recall them, they won't leave office. It's time to get a LOT less polite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. But law is TRICKY and complex
you think you have them trumped only to find they have discovered some hidden loophole... it is a nightmare chess game
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pharaoh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. These guys are clearly insane!
:freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. State officials are not above the law.
We are a nation of laws, not of men. Dane county will enforce the laws of the state and the orders of the court, you can be sure of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddysmellgood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
11. This is a gift. We'll use it to turn out the vote April 5.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. sounds good in theory
if only the system would work for once.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
14. Good. Judges are notoriously unenthusiastic about this stuff
and that little weasel Walker is going to find himself sitting in jail for contempt.

If Wisconsin is lucky, the judge won't let him out until his replacement has been sworn in.

He could be impeached and removed before a recall can be implemented.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iwishiwas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. She was none too happy on Tuesday. Now this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
15. Imposing sanctions: "How a Federal Judge Is Like an 800-Pound Gorilla"
Edited on Wed Mar-30-11 08:03 PM by pacalo
...In a 1991 decision, Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., the Supreme Court held, in essence, that a federal judge is like the proverbial 800-pound gorilla. The majority held that federal judges have all the judicial power necessary to manage their own proceedings and to control the conduct of those who appear before them, including the inherent power to punish abuses of the judicial process. Thus, federal judges have a license to sanction lawyers and litigants virtually at will and without regard to limitations in the Rules and statutes.

http://repository.law.ttu.edu/bitstream/handle/10601/35/baker18.pdf?sequence=1


Walker's thugs are underestimating Judge Sumi's power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iwishiwas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
16. More---this is utter garbage.....




http://uppitywis.org/blogarticle/doa-keep-carrying-maybe-more-or-less-we-think#attachments

Secretary Huebsch Statement on Implementation of 2011 Wisconsin Act 10


MADISON –Wisconsin Department of Administration Secretary Mike Huebsch today released the following
statement regarding the implementation of the budget repair bill:


“I have a legal obligation to execute all laws pertaining to my department that have been passed
by both houses of the legislature, signed by the Governor, and published into law. The
Department of Justice has concluded that 2011 Wisconsin Act 10 has met those requirements
and is now effective law.

My legal counsel agrees with the Department of Justice’s legal
reasoning and conclusions. Accordingly, it is my duty to administer that law.

“On the other hand, Judge Sumi made clear in comments from the bench yesterday that she
intended to prevent further implementation of Act 10 by anyone including, apparently, nonparties
such as myself and the Department of Administration. Yet, the TRO she issued fails to
state that Act 10 is not in effect. In fact, Judge Sumi declined a request to declare that Act 10
was not lawfully published. It is unclear how she can issue an order binding non-parties to a
case who have not had their day in court.


“Because of the questions this TRO raises, its legal effect on my implementation of Act 10 is
also unclear. DOA will continue to monitor court proceedings and work with legal counsel and
the Department of Justice to determine an appropriate course of action.”
-30-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
18. OK now imagine if a Democrat even thought about doing this
Can you say DOUBLE FUCKING STANDARD???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
22. They can't do that
Can they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. only the shadow knows
sorry. just saw the Bottle Rockets and James McMurtry , had a few beers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-11 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
27. Contempt would be a GOOD START.
There's a course we take in law school known as Remedies, which goes into civil and criminal contempt.

I am a lawyer, but I do not play one on TV. I do not have a license, so I cannot sue you. I'll be here all week. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC