Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

‘Fiscal Conservative’ Richard Shelby Forces NASA To Spend $1.4 Million A Day

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 06:53 PM
Original message
‘Fiscal Conservative’ Richard Shelby Forces NASA To Spend $1.4 Million A Day
‘Fiscal Conservative’ Richard Shelby Forces NASA To Spend $1.4 Million A Day On Program It Doesn’t Want
http://thinkprogress.org/2011/03/24/richard-shelby-nasa-program/

Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL) is a “self-professed fiscal conservative” who often rails against government spending and the supposed fiscally imprudent policies of his progressive opponents. He recently put out a statement that said, “Washington must put its fiscal house in order. American taxpayers are rightly infuriated by the federal government’s disregard for the same economic principles that govern every household and business budget.”

Yet when it comes to pork barrel spending for his home state, he is willing to go to extraordinary lengths to waste taxpayers’ money. The Chicago Tribune reports today that a provision Shelby inserted into the 2010 budget that has survived both recent continuing resolutions is costing taxpayers more than a million dollars every single day. The “Shelby provision,” as it is called, forces NASA to spend $1.4 million daily on the Constellation moon program, which it already canceled and doesn’t even want:

Congress has again failed to rid a temporary spending bill of language forcing NASA to waste $1.4 million a day on its defunct Constellation moon program.

This so-called “Shelby provision” — named for U.S. Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Alabama, who inserted it into the 2010 budget — is expected to cost NASA roughly $29 million during the three-week budget extension through April 8. It has already cost the agency nearly $250 million since Oct. 1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Never has a "household" reduced its debt by reducing its income
Shelby is a fool.

Actually, it's more likely he doesn't believe his own bs, and those who do are the fools.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Exactly.
And yes, he's a fool. As are all repukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. As long as it is his provision, the taxpayers should make him pay for the
waste of the money or he can strip it out of the bill.
Time to hold these politicians responsible for the money they waste.
They have no problem telling everyone else how they are paid too much, waste money.
Time to hold them to the same standards that they want to hold everyone else.

Tired of these asses
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. But no money for impoverished children. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. Dumbass, greedy Dick backing into the right thing for fucked up reasons.
NASA needs many times it's shitty pittance. Cutting NASA funding only surpasses shoddily funding NASA in suicidal refusal to invest and discover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. Whoever wrote this article doesn't understand NASA or the basic underlying issues.
I'd like to see a better source, honestly, than someone who refers to the "Ares I Shuttle Program" :shrug: Dude clearly doesn't know dick about what he's talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. Richard "We've got Osama on the Run" Shelby?
Edited on Thu Mar-24-11 11:20 PM by The Backlash Cometh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC