Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scott Brown opposed defunding Planned Parenthood

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
one_voice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 12:51 PM
Original message
Scott Brown opposed defunding Planned Parenthood
Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.) said Tuesday that he opposes House GOP efforts to choke off funding for Planned Parenthood as part of the ongoing budget negotiations between the two chambers.

"I support family planning and health services for women," the moderate Brown, who supports abortion rights, said in a statement. "Given our severe budget problems, I don't believe any area of the budget is completely immune from cuts. However, the proposal to eliminate all funding for family planning goes too far. As we continue with our budget negotiations, I hope we can find a compromise that is reasonable and appropriate."

House conservatives have demanded that Congress end federal funding - about $330 million -- for the organization because of the abortion services it provides. Even though current law prevents federal funds from being used on abortions, critics say giving the money to the organization ensures that it has the resources to administer the procedure. Last month, the House adopted an amendment by a 240-185 to cut off funding for the group - with 10 Democrats voting for it, and seven Republicans voting against it.

But the Brown announcement shows a growing divide between the two chambers over the hot-button issue. Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) has raised similar concerns about the House's proposal. It's still an open question how this gets resolved before the government runs out of money April 8.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/0311/Scott_Brown_opposed_defunding_Planned_Parenthood.html



The Teanuts are gonna be pissed..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. It sounds like that's NOT going to fly in the Senate
Edited on Tue Mar-22-11 12:55 PM by Proud Liberal Dem
Murkowski (and I think Snowe and Collins) have come out against this as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. They noticed that they're women?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I guess so!
:rofl:

I do wonder what's with the women in the House supporting it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. I'd be interested in knowing that as well. My guess is that they all have to be
rabid prolifers who are just fanatical on this issue. I can't imagine moderate republican women being so deluded...but then, maybe there are no moderate republican women left...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. ;)
Edited on Tue Mar-22-11 01:04 PM by freshwest
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrightKnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. Dallas spends about $20K to educate each pregnant High School student.
That price does not include WIC, food stamps, medical, and other social services.

How much does it cost to treat someone with AIDS?

Cutting Planned Parenthood is NOT cost effective!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. This is how republicans used to be.
At least in New England, that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadbear Donating Member (799 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. Give him a break. He's trying to get reelected in Massachusetts.
2010 was an anomaly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC