|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 06:38 PM Original message |
MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow Has Huge Night, Hitting Fox-Like Ratings, Even Beating Glenn Beck |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 06:41 PM Response to Original message |
1. grrreat! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Modern_Matthew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 06:42 PM Response to Original message |
2. And the pendulum swings a little more our way. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnnie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 06:44 PM Response to Original message |
3. "Even Beating Glenn Beck" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinboy3niner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 07:00 PM Response to Reply #3 |
16. Props to Rachel--she just sent Beck to ratings BOAT JAIL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 06:01 AM Response to Reply #3 |
53. Ain't that the fucking truth. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eppur_se_muova (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 07:22 AM Response to Reply #3 |
60. I don't know -- I think a Glenn Beck beating video would go viral. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 12:49 PM Response to Reply #60 |
105. Ha! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoddessOfGuinness (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 05:16 PM Response to Reply #3 |
128. My precise thought... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 06:32 PM Response to Reply #3 |
132. Of course half of the folks watching Beck are just seeing how batshit insane he is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sasha031 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 06:47 PM Response to Original message |
4. do they include the people who stream the shows |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Booster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 06:48 PM Response to Original message |
5. Good news. Rock on, Rachel. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
virgogal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 06:49 PM Response to Original message |
6. I'm no TV news regular but it looks like Fox is still way ahead. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 06:51 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. how do they know how many people are watching which show? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
virgogal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 06:55 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. They extrapolate the totals from the sampling that they monitor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 07:34 PM Response to Reply #8 |
31. Ratings journals and same-day DVR viewings. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dappleganger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 06:53 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. Fox is way ahead because most older, stupid people prefer to have their news spoonfed to them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
virgogal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 06:57 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Thanks(I think). I'm old. :-) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dappleganger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 08:03 PM Response to Reply #13 |
39. I'm sorry, so am I. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Little Star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 08:02 PM Response to Reply #11 |
38. There are plenty of young stupid FOX watchers. Can we please |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dappleganger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 08:04 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. Not trying to do that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quakerboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 03:37 PM Response to Reply #40 |
117. Apparently people not 25-54 just watch more TV. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Populist_Prole (774 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 03:13 AM Response to Reply #11 |
46. Gotta say you're right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Irishonly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 12:09 PM Response to Reply #46 |
99. You are right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tsuki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 07:10 AM Response to Reply #11 |
59. This is the 25-54 group. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 10:16 AM Response to Reply #11 |
80. Not to mention it is on the lower tier of DirectTV |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dappleganger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 12:32 PM Response to Reply #80 |
102. That's always pissed me off... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 12:53 PM Response to Reply #102 |
109. I just bought me a Roku box. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
julian09 (418 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 02:40 PM Response to Reply #80 |
111. They should break down rating for FOX by how many are on the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duck (45 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 11:44 AM Response to Reply #11 |
91. Faux by the spoonful |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rurallib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 04:47 PM Response to Reply #11 |
125. Fox is way ahead because they are on most cable & satellite basic systems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bandit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 07:07 PM Response to Reply #6 |
19. Spongebob Squarepants gets ten times the viewers than any show on Fox News |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
virgogal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 07:18 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. I can believe it. My grandchildren loved it when they were young. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eppur_se_muova (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 07:25 AM Response to Reply #19 |
63. Well, Spongebob is more rooted in reality, so that's justified. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Randypiper (527 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 12:36 PM Response to Reply #6 |
103. keep in mind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
speltwon (699 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 06:51 PM Response to Original message |
7. She deserves it. I contrast her with Olberman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
musiclawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 07:39 PM Response to Reply #7 |
33. Keith was the franchise for a long time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
speltwon (699 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 07:48 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. That's fine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 06:07 AM Response to Reply #35 |
54. Stewart was clueless |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JHB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 07:24 AM Response to Reply #54 |
62. Any port in a storm syndrome... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
speltwon (699 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 04:14 PM Response to Reply #54 |
123. I thought it was forgivable and it was a matter of opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-06-11 07:20 AM Response to Reply #123 |
138. But the rhetoric isn't similar. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whathehell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 08:27 AM Response to Reply #35 |
65. I always saw Keith and Rachel as complementary to each other.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
speltwon (699 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 04:15 PM Response to Reply #65 |
124. It doesn't surprise me at all. It was clear in my OP that I recognized it to be so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whathehell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 05:15 PM Response to Reply #124 |
127. So why do you keep repeating yourself? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
speltwon (699 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 05:23 PM Response to Reply #127 |
129. Wow. I'm seeing some pot/kettle'ism here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whathehell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 05:56 PM Response to Reply #129 |
130. Wow. Somehow, I'm not surprised that you would see it that way... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
speltwon (699 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 06:09 PM Response to Reply #130 |
131. I don't feel attacked. That's my point, again... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whathehell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 08:58 PM Response to Reply #131 |
137. Of course you do... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demwing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 02:52 PM Response to Reply #35 |
112. You toss out that word "clownishness" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
speltwon (699 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 04:09 PM Response to Reply #112 |
122. considering that it's by it's very nature a word that represents subjective opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demwing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 07:18 PM Response to Reply #122 |
134. "I am expressing opinion, and I am not going to waste time qualifying it " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
speltwon (699 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 07:23 PM Response to Reply #134 |
135. qualifying it AS opinion and not as objective truth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 04:10 AM Response to Reply #7 |
49. Agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Faygo Kid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 09:26 AM Response to Reply #7 |
69. Keith was "clownish?" He was - is - passionate. And speaks truth to power. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Plucketeer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 09:41 AM Response to Reply #69 |
74. I love them both |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PatSeg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 12:23 PM Response to Reply #74 |
101. Same here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 09:51 AM Response to Reply #7 |
75. I love both Olberman and Maddow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whathehell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 12:05 PM Response to Reply #75 |
96. +100 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 12:49 PM Response to Reply #75 |
106. +1000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_Dog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 06:51 PM Response to Original message |
9. Hooray For Rachel!! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snoutport (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 06:52 PM Response to Original message |
10. I just turned to msnbc for the first time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 07:02 PM Response to Reply #10 |
17. Hi Snoutport! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 07:13 PM Response to Reply #10 |
22. Hello. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snoutport (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 09:54 PM Response to Reply #10 |
42. Thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 11:04 AM Response to Reply #42 |
86. If you miss her show ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tsuki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 07:32 AM Response to Reply #10 |
64. I agree with Secretary Clinton. We are losing the information wars. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PatSeg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 12:04 PM Response to Reply #10 |
95. I gave up on CNN a long time ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 12:52 PM Response to Reply #10 |
108. Subtly conservative? It's sledgehammer conservative in my mind. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 06:57 PM Response to Original message |
14. Rachel is the one who deserves a 3-hour bloc of time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 06:58 PM Response to Original message |
15. Whoa. So these pundits are getting less than 600k viewers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pacalo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 07:05 PM Response to Original message |
18. Way to go, Rachel! I'm proud to be in that number! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nancy Waterman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 07:07 PM Response to Original message |
20. She is the only one I regularly watch now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 07:12 PM Response to Original message |
21. So cool! Keep going, Rachel! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalmuse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 07:20 PM Response to Original message |
24. Wonderful! Love her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whathehell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 12:09 PM Response to Reply #24 |
98. She's a national treasure. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PufPuf23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 07:22 PM Response to Original message |
25. Maddow is the most well reasoned and polite voice on cable TV. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pintobean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 07:24 PM Response to Original message |
26. 25-54 numbers matter to advertisers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oldhippydude (446 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 12:44 AM Response to Reply #26 |
45. please don't kid yourself.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudProgressiveNow (263 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 03:53 AM Response to Reply #26 |
48. 57 and liberal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 09:57 AM Response to Reply #48 |
76. I'm 58 and about as far left as they get in this country |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TicketyBoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 10:19 AM Response to Reply #76 |
81. Politicians expect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kurtzapril4 (354 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 12:08 PM Response to Reply #81 |
97. But they did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TicketyBoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 04:01 PM Response to Reply #97 |
120. There are still |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Faygo Kid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 12:00 PM Response to Reply #48 |
94. 59 here and me, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
juajen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 03:36 PM Response to Reply #48 |
116. 69 and bleeding heart liberal always. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
27. With a little luck, she'll set the new standard for real news. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 07:32 PM Response to Original message |
28. Carry on Rachel! Shout it loud! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 07:33 PM Response to Original message |
29. Aren't they on at different times? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 07:36 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 07:41 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. Not diminishing her increasing sucess by any way, but this isn't exactly apples to apples. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Politicalboi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 07:33 PM Response to Original message |
30. And MSNBC isn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 07:49 PM Response to Reply #30 |
36. But I don't think that they keep Nielsen books at Sam's Club |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 06:15 AM Response to Reply #30 |
55. This is a key factor many forget. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Left coast liberal (889 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 07:56 PM Response to Original message |
37. She is so rock solid and thank god no C. Sheen. Enough already! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fishwax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 08:54 PM Response to Original message |
41. way to go, Rachel! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-04-11 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
43. Deleted message |
donheld (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 12:44 AM Response to Original message |
44. I hope like hell this continues for a long long time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudProgressiveNow (263 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 03:46 AM Response to Original message |
47. Super cool! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SleeplessinSoCal (710 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 05:04 AM Response to Original message |
50. Now that Comcast owns NBC, does that mean they'll allow MSNBC in more markets? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulkienitz (313 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 05:15 AM Response to Original message |
51. I had no idea the big name cable pundits had such small nightly audiences |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 06:00 AM Response to Original message |
52. I haven't watched since Keith left. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TicketyBoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 09:16 AM Response to Reply #52 |
68. You do know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 12:51 PM Response to Reply #68 |
107. Thanks for the info, friend. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TicketyBoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 03:59 PM Response to Reply #107 |
119. You're welcome. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulkienitz (313 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-06-11 12:50 PM Response to Reply #68 |
140. Keith is a loss, but Rachel is the better host |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TicketyBoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-06-11 06:03 PM Response to Reply #140 |
141. I think it's pretty much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Manifestor_of_Light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 07:26 PM Response to Reply #52 |
136. I'm a straight female. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 06:15 AM Response to Original message |
56. My sister in law used to be a rightie. Now she watches MSNBC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 08:50 AM Response to Reply #56 |
66. That is encouraging. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-06-11 07:33 AM Response to Reply #66 |
139. Aye aye. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deacon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 06:41 AM Response to Original message |
57. Well, CNN is just garbage. Fox is not news. Rachel is the best on the airwaves. People are waking up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chipper Chat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 07:23 AM Response to Reply #57 |
61. CNN is wall-to-wall Libya with a little Charlie Scream thrown in. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inuca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 09:40 AM Response to Reply #61 |
73. Do you think that "wall to wall" Libya |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chipper Chat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 11:18 AM Response to Reply #73 |
87. I just dont like crowding out everything else for Libya. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inuca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 11:19 AM Response to Reply #87 |
88. I did not hear that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
myrna minx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 07:05 AM Response to Original message |
58. I'm sure more people are watching her because of word of mouth via FB |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 08:53 AM Response to Original message |
67. Woooodamnwhoooooo Rache! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCofVA (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 09:30 AM Response to Original message |
70. Go Rach! The awakening is gaining momentum |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mosaic (851 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 09:38 AM Response to Original message |
71. Compare the amount of viewers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reformist2 (998 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 09:39 AM Response to Original message |
72. It's good to see that people are attracted to quality reporting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Slit Skirt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 09:57 AM Response to Original message |
77. fantastic job considering in most areas you have to pay for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Reader Rabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 10:12 AM Response to Original message |
78. This is exceptionally good, because... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Faygo Kid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 10:22 AM Response to Reply #78 |
82. When it comes to covering Wisconsin, don't forget Ed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Reader Rabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 10:26 AM Response to Reply #82 |
83. I would never forget Ed! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whathehell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 11:58 AM Response to Reply #82 |
93. Yes, he started it, at least on his radio show and then he took it to MSNBC. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 10:14 AM Response to Original message |
79. no matter WHAT rw'ers would like everyone to believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shagbark Hickory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 10:54 AM Response to Original message |
84. That's surprising because for the first time ever, I wanted to shut her off early. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Overseas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
85. I've been watching. K&R! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joey Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 11:31 AM Response to Original message |
89. Rachel Maddow is the best! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roy Rolling (762 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 11:40 AM Response to Original message |
90. kudos... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
92. Gov. Walker is helping to put a big dent in all things Repubbish. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JeffersonChick (338 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
100. k & r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
104. Woo hoo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dave From Canada (932 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
110. How can you compare ratings between a show on at 5pm and a show at 9pm? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
julian09 (418 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 04:06 PM Response to Reply #110 |
121. Rachel is in prime time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quakerboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 03:22 PM Response to Original message |
113. I love the Maddow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 03:28 PM Response to Original message |
114. I just saw that this morning... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
electricfarmer (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
115. Rachel should run for office |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greymattermom (680 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 03:48 PM Response to Original message |
118. 64 and clean for Gene |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl_interrupted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 04:50 PM Response to Original message |
126. K&R Love Rachel! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Corruption Winz (581 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-05-11 06:45 PM Response to Original message |
133. While I consider this great news... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 13th 2024, 04:16 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC