Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is meth a right wing drug?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 01:48 PM
Original message
Is meth a right wing drug?
I know cannabis is now used across the political spectrum but didn't it used to be a left wing thing in the 60's?

I was looking at a map which shows counties with lots of meth busts and i noticed that they are also heavily republican areas. Certain areas of Alaska also come to mind.


I was just wondering if meth was more of a right wing drug. As in right wing mindsets will appreciate meth more than a lefty. As with crack or powder cocaine snorted or smoked meth is a drug that makes people feel "on top of the world" and full of aggressive energy seems to me to be more of a lure for right wing types.

on the other hand MDMA (ecstacy) which promises feelings of empathy and love seems to be more like something those of us on the left would like.

What do you all think?

Are righties attracted to meth and cocaine, or does doing these drugs make one more of an individualistic asshole?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Anyone can become addicted to drugs. There is no left wing or right
wing drug.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I do think meth stimulates right-wing parts of the brain...
rage, hate, paranoia, misanthropy, selfishness, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. While it may stimulate what you call the "right wing" parts of the brain,
it can also be additive to anyone (right or left).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EOTE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. That doesn't address the OP, though.
Which asks if those on the left or the right are more likely to partake. I think overall, drugs like coke and meth ARE right wing drugs. I know all I have to offer is anecdotes, but when I was in college, all the right wing blowhards did coke. My far more liberal friends smoked weed. Everyone is well aware that anyone can succumb to addiction, that doesn't mean that there can't be a correlation between choice of drugs and political affiliation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. My point is, I don't think there really is a "right-wing" or "left-wing" drug
of choice. It would be interesting if there is actually any real statistics about this. Right now everyone is just offering anecdotal information. And my anecdotal information contradicts yours. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EOTE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. That's your opinion, which you earlier on stated as fact.
While I firmly believe there is a correlation between political leaning and choice of drugs, I don't claim it as definitive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. True but meth is more of a rural/suburb drug which tends to be red regions of the country...
where as crack/herion is found more in urban blue parts area.

But there is alot of overlap!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. You explained where it is found, but why did they start where they did?
Crack/heroin has also been around for a century.

Meth, from what I understand, is a couple of decades old, and was designed out of pseudofed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Couple of decades? Hitler gave meth to his soldiers and pilots
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methamphetamine#World_War_II

One of the earliest uses of methamphetamine was during World War II, when it was used by Axis and Allied forces.<10> The German military dispensed it under the trademark name Pervitin. It was widely distributed across rank and division, from elite forces to tank crews and aircraft personnel, with many millions of tablets being distributed throughout the war.<11> From 1942 until his death in 1945, Adolf Hitler may have been given intravenous injections of methamphetamine by his personal physician Theodor Morell. It is possible that it was used to treat Hitler's speculated Parkinson's disease, or that his Parkinson-like symptoms that developed from 1940 onwards resulted from using methamphetamine.<12> In Japan, methamphetamine was sold under the registered trademark of Philopon (ヒロポン, hiropon?) by Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma for civilian and military use. As with the rest of the world at the time, the side effects of methamphetamine were not well studied, and regulation was not seen as necessary.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MedicalAdmin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #26
50. It's been speculated that airmen brought the bathtub recipe back
after WW2.

I know that it tends to be manufactorer in the sticks (not exclusively, but it helps if you can get liquid fertilizer). And rural America is more red than blue, generally speaking.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. Meth has been around since at least WWII
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #22
56. That's not true about meth.
There was plenty of methamphetamine around back in the late '60s, it just wasn't the bathtub variety.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. true
but are right and left people drawn to different drugs due to differences in the highs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superduperfarleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. :headdesk: n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yeah. I had similar thoughts also...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. oh what a cute bear, can i steal that photo from you???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. No problem.
It's from teh internets!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
38. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EOTE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. Makes sense to me.
Anecdotally, that seems to be what I've noticed. And the fact that the 80's were synonymous with coke seems to suggest you're right. As for your final question, I think both parts are correct. It's like a positive feedback loop. Righties are attracted to drugs like meth and coke. Once they do them/become addicted to them, they become even greater individualistic assholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. Drugs know no barriers. They just are.
Meth is popular among all walks, as is heroin, crack, coke etc....

The only drug that really belongs to the ultra-ultra poor is sniffing glue. Because its the cheapest way to leave your mind. ($5.99 and it will last you a month)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erose999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
10. The person to ask would be Charlie Sheen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
11. Does meth make the user fucking insane?
If so that might explain the incredible level of insanity we are witnessing in elected Republicans today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trekbiker Donating Member (724 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
12. I grew up in a largely right wing rural community..
In my "experimental" stage in the 1970's alcohol and pot were pretty much the drug of both left and right. Cocaine was mostly right wing. One interesting drug was mushrooms. Right (redneck) friends of mine did not like shrooms and several had bad experiences on them. My left (post hippy) friends loved shrooms. I think it had to do with the way hallucinogens like acid and shrooms tear down the mental walls and psychological barriers and protections we all build up in life. Lefties would laugh and trip and righties would be terror struck. None of us were political back then in our late teens and early 20's but it was obvious who were on the left and who were on the right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellerpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. Timothy McVeigh was a tweaker.
He liked to sit up all night with his fake "army" buddies in the eastern mountains (LOL) of Oklahoma and dream of the revolution that would start once he brought down the Murrah Building in OKC. Meth has been a huge drug enforcement problem in AZ, OK, AR, and other places where conservatism rules. IMO, it just goes well with Rush, and Beck & G. Gordon Liddy's brand of gov'mint hatin'. It costs law enforcement in rural areas a fortune to clean up the aftermath of it's manufacture in hotel rooms and other places that have been used as labs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MedicalAdmin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
51. It ain't like the old days when you could just bust up the still...
... and pour out the mash.

Can't even burn it down because of the probability of shit blowing up or windage killing someone. Kinda interesting that it is basically the marriage of monsanto and Pfizer in a way. Better living through chemistry meets a bathtub.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellerpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #51
62. Firefighters and police need biohazard suits to gather
evidence and do cleanup. Hotels/motels that were used as meth labs endanger the health of everyone who enters the room afterwards. Meth addicts are nearly impossible to rehabilitate; they abandon their kids or poison them with the byproducts of their addiction. They destroy their health and die young (or early if they are older when they begin) and it takes very little to hook them forever. Then there are the wider implications. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MedicalAdmin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #62
70. It's seriously bad juju. That's for sure.
I've helped do a clean up. Nothing beats a 100 degree day doing physicial labor in a hazmat suit.... There are some studies that once someone takes Meth it is a permanent addictive change - longitudinal studies are needed but some researchers believe that no one who takes it will ever get over it. What is known conclusively is that if it is taken even once it causes a permanent bio-chemical change in the brain.

Ironic that it was developed by the military, don't you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellerpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #70
71. I did research on meth when I was working on a novel.
Also when researching the OKC bombing trying to find T. McVeigh's inspiration. My brother raised the child of a meth head from the time his mother got hooked (the kid was a young teen at the time) until she died from her addiction just after her child graduated college. Even the legendary maternal instinct is overridden by the bio-chemical change you mention. My elderly relatives have lost their life savings by supporting multiple revolving door rehabs for their addicted daughter. The effects are permanent and devastating. I did not run across the fact that it was developed by the military. Our military? Did our tax dollars pay for this swill? To what purpose, I wonder? I guess it would make soldiers who would feel bulletproof and insure that they would re-enlist in order to keep a steady supply. It is the perfect substance to ruin a person completely in a short time and never allow them to recover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MedicalAdmin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #71
74. Here's a link.
http://www.montgomerycountytn.org/County/sheriff/meth/methHistory.aspx


It was used extensively by air crews for keeping awake during long flights and to keep sharp for combat air to air combat. It's been around for a long time. It's a freaking plague.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellerpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #74
75. Interesting that AZ has "no data" when they are
one of the most overrun of states. I actually had heard of pilots taking 'speed' to stay alert, etc., and my dad used to always have one of those OTC benzedrine inhalers that looked like Chapstick to me when I was a kid. I remember when he had to get off of it and know it caused a few tense scenes in our house back in the mid-60s, I think. It is a plague. Thanks for the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MedicalAdmin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #75
76. That kind of Data is gathered by government agencies.
In arizona that would be considered bad, wasteful and inefficient.

and your are welcome. Glad to help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellerpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #70
72. dupe. Delete.
Edited on Thu Mar-03-11 12:31 PM by yellerpup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sixmile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
14. Meth is more Libertarian
Ayn Rand followers mostly, and teabaggers...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shandris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
15. To paraphrase a similar line...
..It's not a left thing or a right thing, it's a death thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
16. Meth is a drug for Village Idiots
If you aren't already a Village Idiot when you start using it, you will become one soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ehrnst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
19. Lower middle/working class whites are the primary users of Meth. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. don't most working class whites
vote Republican? I know its fucked up, the base of the right wing here in france is the white working class too, it blows my mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
21. Meth is a rural drug, crack is an urban drug. The reason that meth is rural...
is that these are areas too isolated to be part of the patchwork operation that is the US cocaine supply network. Similarly, rural areas tend to get bypassed by the heroin trade, and turn to opiod painkillers. The common link between these drugs is that in the absence of the high grade illegal narcotics, people in the country turn to the legal drugs of the pharmacy as the source material for their drugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Thanks for that explanation. That is the closest to anything that makes
sense in this thread.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. Very difficult to build a meth lab in an urban setting - the neighbors would smell it
although I am sure there are those that tried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #29
35. Honolulu used to have about one apartment lab bust a month
until the big shipments started coming in from Mexico and the Philippines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NICO9000 Donating Member (574 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
28. Don't think so
I agree with everyone posting that drugs know no particular ideology. Back in the Raygun days, I knew plenty of sorta-conservative guys who had no trouble sparking one up or hoovering up lines of coke. I've always thought that pot and the psychedelic drugs should make people more liberal as they do help op
That said, I never thought I'd see the day that meth/speed/crank would be as popular as it is these days. What on earth do you do if you stay up for days at a time? It's not like the average tweaker has some high-powered job he or she can devote all their time to ala the cocaine-fueled yuppies of the 80s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
31. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. why?
Like I said i was looking at maps of counties with high levels of meth lab busts and noticed that it quite often correlated to right wing voting counties. why is this stupid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #33
39. It's not. But you are talking to people with limited drug experience
or a closed mind as is obvious by the generic answers.

Yes what you are asking is true in a sense. Speed, Meth, Coke while used by the liberal mind as well, are "aggressive" drugs and could be considered "right". While your hallucinogenics, pot, mushrooms, X, acid would be considered more "left" drugs.

Nothing is set in stone but you will not find many conservative users of hallucinogenics as the use of them expands the mind and Republicans are nothing if not closed minded.

Ignore the people who jump right out of the gate and call your post stupid, they are ignorant on the subject, it's not their fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zappaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
32. Nope
Meth has taken up residence at Venice Beach, CA.
You can't get much more liberal than Venice!
Drugs don't see age, sex, ethnicity, or religion, so drugs certainly don't see political affiliation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rebubula Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
34. Another awesome post...
...that tries (for whatever reason) to tie one character flaw to another and make it political.

Correlation does NOT equal causation.

I would further say that almost all Meth users are simply stupid and not concerned with politics.








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #34
41. i never said their was causation
i simply posed the question as to whether or not their was after noticing the correlation. hence the "is" at the beginning of my op
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
36. Well, it makes you stupid,
so yes. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
37. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #37
43. I asked a question.
i din't say "meth is a right wing drug" i asked the question because i noticed correlation between meth lab bust rates and voting right wing on county by county maps. i then had the idea that perhaps people are attracted to certain drugs because of their personalities and that these same personality tendencies would make us into right or left wing voters too. like that mdma gives feeling of empathy (somthing i associate with liberals, not conservatives) and meth using people tend to be arrogant and self centered (both personality traits that i would assosiate with the right wing).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
40. Show me some stats and I'll tell you what I think. Until then, I'll refrain from calling you names.
Edited on Wed Mar-02-11 04:21 PM by Shagbark Hickory
Cuz I'm not an asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. just the maps i was looking at of my home state
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. Unless I am confuzzled, it looks like the most meth seizures are in blue zones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 04:47 AM
Response to Reply #45
58. They are, blue is Republican on this map and red is Democrat
Blue zones voted bush and red zones voted kerry. perhaps the map was made by an english person? at any rate in the rest of the world they do as on this map red=left (communist) and blue = right (capitalist) Hardly any meth busts in cook county (chicago) which voted kerry yet many of the counties shaded in blue (republican voting on this map) also have lots of meth lab busts.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #58
63. Yep. Sure enough. I can't believe that many people in IL voted for bush in '04
Especially since it looks like the bluer (redder) you get, is around chicago. That's the opposite of what I would think would be the case.
How about 08 election. Same thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #63
64. cook county votes on the left all the time, chicago is in cook county
the suburbs on the other hand are often on the right but here is the 2008 map http://www.uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/state.php?f=0&fips=17&year=2008
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #64
65. They need to swap those colors. So confusing. Anyway, was there a decrease in meth seizures in 08? n
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #65
68. i dont have maps for 08 to see
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #68
69. Well then there really isn't a broad enough range of samples for me to formulate a conclusion then .
My original perception was that meth originated in and was most prevalent on the west coast. I know it has since spread like wildfire but I'm more inclined to think if anything, it's a left coast drug but like I said, some stats are really needed to form a conclusion based on fact rather than observation from one election poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildEyedLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #58
73. You're from Illinois but you think rural meth use is about politics?
How clueless can you get? Do you even know how meth is made? Anhydrous ammonia is a major ingredient in meth-making, and it also happens to be a very common for use on farms. The ingredients to make meth are far easier to find in farm country than they are in the city, and similarly, rural areas don't get the coke and heroin traffic that cities do. It's a matter of access, not politics. That's why your OP is getting well-deserved scorn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ileus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
44. I think you'll find most methmouths are nonpolitical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kievan Rus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
46. Unrec. Not everything is politicized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
47. I've always thought of meth being more neoliberal, although it aligns with Chicago School economics.
Republican drugs are more your oxycontin, Thalidomide, and Doan's Back Pills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RadiationTherapy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
48. It does seem that the behaviors of meth heads are more "amygdala oriented"
than that of pot users.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
49. I'm a far left guy
and I used and loved the drug. No longer use but that is because it is not as prevelant as it used to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
52. George Carlin succinctly explained all drug use
He said people use drugs because drugs make them feel better.

The meth question is probably one of distribution.
Imported drugs like cocaine end up in cities and don't make their way out to rural areas.

So the folks in these "under served" areas cook their own (horrible) stimulants.

Demand and distribution are a more likely explanation than political views.
Seems unlikely that a hard core tweaker would bother to vote, one way or another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
53. no, it just makes you imitate a winger...the empty eyes, reduced brain-function
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YellowRubberDuckie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
54. Meth is a drug of POVERTY.
I don't know if it has political leanings, but most of the people who take it are uneducated, so maybe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #54
57. That could be a correlation except I know educated people who use it also.
Meth is everywhere, people I know who use it are from all over the political spectrum. Not sure if or why it is primarily rural, due to it's toxicity when being made perhaps? I know people who are educated who started meth, some who aren't. I'm not going to make a broad statement based on who I know, because it seems like all sorts.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
55. Well, as you've mentioned,
there IS Wasilla, the right armpit of Alaska.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 05:08 AM
Response to Original message
59. More like a rural drug
Sort of like crack is an urban drug.

Rural areas are more socially conservative, though often populist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
60. I live in Meth Mecca. Most of the meth heads I know are apolitical
meth is cheap and easily addictive.

Rural meth labs seem to be the trend.

We are 90% Republican... but I don't think these folks voted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
61. K&R- It is a drug for stupids...If you are not stupid when you start, you rapidly become so....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
66. Meth is an All-American drug.
It appeals to our sense that we need to do more, better, faster. Or conversely, we're not successful because we don't do enough, well enough or fast enough. But once you enter the rat-race that is meth, you learn that you can never hold that edge for long without more, more, more... Then it begins to wear you down. Then it destroys you.

In America, the arc of the meth addict is an enhanced version of the arc of the American Worker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
67. Greed, Reaganomics and bastardry are right wing drugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC