FU Chris Matthews

[lifesbeautifulmagic]

so some lying hard right anti woman spewer is on the show talking about how Planned Parenthood works with and funds child prostitution blah blah blah "Have you seen the videos Chris, well have you"

And Matthews just changed the subject. left that statement hanging out there like it was truth.

FUCK YOU CHRIS MATTHEWS. SHE IS A LIAR, AND THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT YOU SHOULD HAVE TOLD HER, RIGHT BEFORE YOU KICKED HER OFF YOUR SHOW. LIAR LIAR LIAR

[inademv]

1. Matthews like all the rest of the older corespondants

fail to catch the details. This is exactly why Maddow is better than him. If it had been Rachel doing the moderation, you can damn sure bet that she would have caught that line about the videos and stuck it to the bitch HARD. Fucking Matthews is a slow as fuck Luddite that isn't capable of carrying on a debate of any kind.

[whathehell]

18. All of the "older correspondents"?

You mean like Keith Olbermann?

He's fifty, I believe.

Hint: Of all the difference between Maddow and Tweety, age would be the least of them.

Rachel is a principled progressive..Mathews is (at best) a finger in the wind blue dog democrat

[rusty charly]

2. I thought he pretty much dismissed her

But I agree, when he said "I want to stick to the truth, here," I yelled at the TV, "Tell her she's lying. She's a liar. Call her a liar to her face on national TV!"

[gatorboy]

Double.

D'oh.

[gatorboy]

3. Ugh. And the constant eye rolling...

I wanted to shake the TV (But it's heavy).

[upi402]

4. When MSNBC replaces the daytime pap with an Amy Goodman or Laura Ingraham

it would really be a force for good. But Twety gives me whiplash - no reason he's on for an hour, every other hour, in the eves. Too much.

[givemebackmycountry]

11. Laura Ingraham?

Laura Ingraham?

Really?

[upi402]

16. Laura FLANDERS

face-palm

[givemebackmycountry]

19. I thought so -

You get a "true blue" heart for your face-palm!

:toast: :pals:

[upi402]

20. Sometimes I wonder what keeps

my ears from just smashing right together. lol:hi:

[lifesbeautifulmagic]

5. The thing is, I wish Chris would realize.

he says that he wants to get past "the old arguments", but when he books guests that come from such a place of untruth and lies, there is no debate. There is no starting point to work from.

And when he has guests that spew such wild lies, he owes it to us, the audience, to immediately get rid of them, as in GET THE HELL OFF MY SHOW.

Sorry, I am very pissed here.

[gatorboy]

8. If he didn't like "the old arguments" then he shouldn't have booked someone that lives by them.

I mean, what did he expect her to say?

[Cleita]

6. Glad I switched the channel.

I don't mind that they have these wackos on but what I do mind is that they don't challenge their stupidity and lies and Matthews seldom does. I was also pissed with Lawrence O'Donnell when he had Ann Coulter on and she made a blatantly racist remark and he didn't make her eat it. He actually ignored what she said because it was supposedly a joke, yes, Lawrence an unfunny, racist joke.

[w8liftinglady]

7. well,I almost posted FU directed at that bitch

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_B._Anthony_List

[w8liftinglady]

10. this woman...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marjorie_Dannenfelser

[niyad]

9. was it lila rose? and what was she even doing on the show in the first damned place?

[TuxedoKat]

12. I don't know

I thought Chris looked sort of tired so maybe he wasn't feeling well. He didn't let her get away with some of her nonsense but you're right he didn't go after her like he should have and normally would have on her last remark.

[RandomThoughts]

13. I was wondering about that also.

Evian Roller Babies US (to show CGI capabilities) I don't think CGI is wonder mike.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfvfP0II7QA

I support women's health care rights.

But also know that 'videos' and 'video' evidence, with the current state of tech, should be looked at for credibility in the comment.

Just like many people are in prison by frames of people 'looking like someone else' it is also possible for some to manipulate things like videos and use that against people.

At some point video evidence used by some groups may not be accurate.


What if a smear was created by CGI, or editing, what if someone 'looking like someone' was used to frame someone. It brings up many questions about how society should look at things like video evidence, and use of line up identifications, or even circumstantial evidence that creates smears against people.


There really are many innocent people in prison.



"Can't you see the Change In Me" I wonder about that when watching some videos recently.

Give Me Strength by Over the Rhine
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qVbl0CulcZg


Many of the recent edited videos, seem to be trying to move concepts away from what they are, into some other concept.

Bob Seger - Like A Rock
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1xuz9_bob-seger-like-a-rock_music

[niyad]

15. the lila rose videos are already proven to be nonsense, it isn't even cgi

[ellenfl]

14. i think tweety's problem is that he is so busy thinking about what

HE is going to say next, that he lets too much slide. i thought the videos were already debunked? he barely let degette talk.

anyway, he's surely anti-abortion, so I wouldn't expect him to be unbiased on the issue.

he seems to be in the throes of an identity crisis lately.

ellen

[Badfish]

17. I like his show.

sorry.