Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Could Egypt Happen Here? Obama's Internet "Kill Switch"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
harvey007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 01:18 PM
Original message
Could Egypt Happen Here? Obama's Internet "Kill Switch"
Source: Fast Company

First it was Facebook. Then it was Twitter. Now, in the face of massive protests in the streets of Cairo and throughout the country, Egypt has pulled the plug on the entire Internet for its citizens. As this chart from Arbor networks shows, Internet traffic mounted steadily in Egypt steadily over several days, then suddenly and precipitously dropped to nil at 5:20 PM EST yesterday.

The US has condemned the move--in a tweet, no less.

Such a flagrant violation of communications--possible only in the less free corners of the world, right? But since last summer, when a Senate bill was introduced by Joe Lieberman, the US has been considering an Internet "kill switch" of its own. Full text of the bill, "Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset," can be found here. "For all of its 'user-friendly' allure, the Internet can also be a dangerous place with electronic pipelines that run directly into everything from our personal bank accounts to key infrastructure to government and industrial secrets," Lieberman said in June.

Read more: http://www.fastcompany.com/1721753/egypt-internet-kill-switch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Definitely it could to control the masses. ... just thinking about how the air waves
Edited on Fri Jan-28-11 01:24 PM by RKP5637
were jammed in other countries. Russia used to jam the air waves all the time. An Internet kill sw here could be basically the same - at minimal taking down selected sites - depending on how implemented.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why don't you change that to "Lieberman's Internet Kill Switch"
"when a Senate bill was introduced by Joe Lieberman, the US has been considering an Internet "kill switch" of its own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. +1, n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Just learned it is Lieberman (I-Conn.) and Susan Collins (R-Maine)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x585155

I am calling my Senators on this. it is more Liebermann wingnuttery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. You're lucky. My senators could care less what I think. Despite the hype, the Internet
can be very fragile, especially if a gov. wants to take it down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harvey007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. DU rules require exact headline
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Really? because I see people post thread titles that are different
than article headlines all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Maybe the U.S.'s kill switch. (Lieberman would not be the one to give the order; Obama may never
Edited on Fri Jan-28-11 01:53 PM by No Elephants
give it, even if he could.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freedomnorth Donating Member (237 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. They failed in Tunis
when Ben Ali failed to shutdown Internet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Safetykitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. Of course it could. Why would anyone think otherwise?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
byronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. What a misleading headline. You apparently hate that man.
The word 'Obama' is not in that article.

Great tactics. I call bullshit on you, friend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. In the event of widespread unrest and rebelion...yes.
We would need to get a lot more people off their couches to reach that point.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. the image
of the protestors literally tearing apart an armoured vehicle with their bare hands as they did today in Suez, will forever humble me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
byronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
12. All right, his name is there. Sorry to have impugned you.
I get tired of Obama as the bogey man. I really do. I don't buy it, and I knee-jerked at your headline, but it is the headline.

I apologize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
15. The impact of gadgets is grossly overestimated

Sure, lots of people are using them and they certainly have been useful. But without the will of the people they are just hunks of plastic.
The 'kill switch' would be an inconvenience but nothing insurmountable if the people have the will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
16. It's called "Obama's" because only the President could order it, and he happens to occupy the seat.
Edited on Fri Jan-28-11 03:45 PM by WinkyDink
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC