Why Ignore Sarah Palin?

[Swede]

Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank has gotten so tired of reading his own articles about Sarah Palin that he's proposing a "Palin-Free February" of news coverage. You can join him by taking a Twitter pledge! But why?

Milbank follows the New York Times' Ross Douthat in wishing that everyone would just stop talking and typing about Sarah Palin, and maybe she'll go away, because she's not very important to begin with


http://gawker.com/5740115/why-ignore-sarah-palin?skyline=true&s=i

[RandySF]

1. Ask John Kerry

How effective it is to ignore outrageous things.

[my2sense]

2. +1

[ScreamingMeemie]

3. Who?

Never heard of her.

[elocs]

4. Because she is an attention whore and a major DU obsession.

I do think that DU would need some kind of 12 step program for Palin withdrawal.

[delightfulstar]

5. Why not?

She's a Faux Noise shill, and she has nothing to say that's worth listening to, unless you're a Freeper or a Teabagger.