Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It only takes $26 to hack a voting machine

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-11 11:00 PM
Original message
It only takes $26 to hack a voting machine
Researchers demonstrated three different types of attacks

Campaigning for the 2012 presidential race has already begun, but what the candidates don't know is that come election day, hackers could be the ones whose votes have the biggest impact.

Researchers from the Argonne National Laboratory in Illinois have developed a hack that, for about $26 and an 8th-grade science education, can remotely manipulate the electronic voting machines used by millions of voters all across the U.S.

The researchers, Salon reported, performed their proof-of-concept hack on a Diebold Accuvote TS electronic voting machine, a type of touchscreen Direct Recording Electronic (DRE) voting system that is widely used for government elections.

(Diebold's voting-machine business is now owned by the Denver-based Dominion Voting Systems, whose e-voting machines are used in about 22 states.)


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44706301/ns/technology_and_...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-11 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. meanwhile the democratic party INC does nothing to secure voting. thanks a lot dems nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-11 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Germany bans computerized voting; will hand count in 2009, by Paul Lehto
Hand counted paper ballots to be used now in Germany's 2009 elections -- computerized secret vote counting banned by constitutional PRINCIPLES!


Computerized voting machines used by 2 million of Germany's 5 million voters in 2005 are unconstitutional and not in line with democratic standards, especially the publicity of the counting (i.e. transparency, visibility). Thus, the 2009 elections - European Parliament in June and the Bundestag (German parliament) elections in September may not use existing voting machines and will be on paper and hand counted. Here's the Decision in German (with Google Translate and lotsa imagination you might get a useful translation -- the official English translation is due in a day or two).




Despite any modest statements reported in the media by one single judge (Herr Vossruhle) to the effect that the German high court's ruling doesn't necessarily ban (as a class) all computerized systems -- only the system used in the close German parliamentary elections of 2005 was ruled upon -- this seeming qualification is required by all courts because they can only rule on the case before them.


However, this seeming qualification is totally belied by the principles the court held and affirmed were required by the constitution. (links below)


The twin requirements, of constitutional magnitude, of no "specialized technical knowledge" being required for citizens, combined with the constitutional requirement of a publicly observed count as a practical matter make secret vote counting on computers impossible as the primary means of counting. Nor will a paper trail suffice, said the Court, according to reports about the ruling from European media linked below.


http://www.opednews.com/articles/Germany-bans-computeri...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-11 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. And Dems have done nothing and remained SILENT on this for a decade and more now!!
SILENCE IS ALSO AN ANSWERE -- !!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bennyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-11 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Doomed.
Why bother? Seriously? I love to vote but not now. I tis crap and we all know it. WORSE is that we DO NOTHING AT ALL ABOUT IT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SugarShack Donating Member (979 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-11 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. Optiscan Voting Machine Hack Test for your review


Video - Optiscan Voting Machine Hack Test for your review
This test was performed in the office of FLA's Leon County's Supervisor of Elections, Ion Sancho. A hero in the election reform movement. Ion is an independent, and all of our electeds in this area should be non-partisan. This is now how the entire state of Florida votes, and we have a very inadequate audit system to verify our vote. These machines are now used all over our country, except in Minnesota, where they STILL hand count the paper ballots. Please watch the testimony and video example below:

And no nooze would report it!!!

One man's private, sole source company programs 81% of the election in New Hampshire, 100% in Connecticut, almost all of Massachusetts and most of Vermont. Never before seen video of the under-the-radar elections contractor John Silvestro as he tangles with master security expert Harri Hursti.For the full version of the hack see the 80 minute HBO film "Hacking Democracy"

http://www.youtube.com:80/watch?v=PiiaBqwqkXs

Dems did nothing in 2000 or 2004. And they believed the crooks went on vacation and Obama really won? Remember all the gaming of delegates? Hillary had to give him half in Fla and Mich??? WE don't choose the prez anymore. watch the video!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-11 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. In MD, cell phones and video cameras are BANNED from polls ...
I was told this is because of fears that RFI from electronic devices could interfere with voting machines. If they've actually shown this is possible then WHY are our votes being entrusted to these machines?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 23rd 2014, 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC