Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A little fact about east coast vs west coast earthquakes.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 02:23 PM
Original message
A little fact about east coast vs west coast earthquakes.
Point for point, the earthquakes on the east coast are significantly more powerful - perhaps as much as 10 times more powerful - than those on the west coast. The west is a far younger geology. As such, it is softer and dampens the effect of the event. East coast geology is far older and much harder. The bedrock is more monolithic, causing the effect to be undampened and far more capable of traveling far greater distances.

This is not to say that east coast quakes are worse. Clearly the west coast is the worse ate for them. But it IS to say that east coast quakes are not insignificant.








Source, Robert Bazell, NBC science reporter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. One other important point - you can't construct a kid's tree house in calif.
Without some official insisting you have a geologist site the bit of construction for its earthquake safety.

Many half million dollar, California homes have at least 100K of their value there on account of mandated foundational structures.

So when a big quake hits, people in California are indeed safer than they would be on the East Coast.

It has cost us a lot, but the safety is there.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kick-ass-bob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. No, point for point, the distance felt will be greater.
The amount of energy released is the same, just spread over a bigger area.

Also, are people supposed to crowd outside buildings after an earthquake? This just seems a little odd to me...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Yes. Because all those people crowded together will hold the damaged buildings up.
Until they are sure it's safe to go inside, outside seems reasonable. Esp places that aren't prepared for things like quakes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woodsprite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. They'll cushion the parts of buildings that will fall.
Edited on Tue Aug-23-11 02:42 PM by woodsprite
Then those parts can be used to rebuild.

Truthfully, my first thought was "Oh, look at everything shaking.", with my very quick second thought being "I have to call home, I bet my daughter is scared." Never even thought of evacuating. Besides, I think I would have dove under my desk before I ran outside. Now that I think about it, that might be a bad choice since we are a building of nothing but cubbies. Very few walls go all the way to the ceiling. Outside might be safer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. You are correct
A 5.9 releases the same amount of energy in VA as in CA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. NO. They need to stay in the buildings in a safe place
Many times people get hurt because of falling debris from the fronts of those buildings. Not to mention the many crazed people who may just mow you down in their frenzy to get out of those buildings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. W coast the underlying stuff is broken up, E coast not so much
The quakes affect the chunk of bedrock they are in. It spreads until it hits a crack, which are much closer on W coast. Yes, we have a lot of cracks out here, meaning could get a quake along/any. But E coast one the impact is spread much more widely.

Says my CA born/lived Mr. Repeatedly. Not to repeat. But does. Again.

Not to say either are worse, just indeed the underlying bits are different, leading to them feeling and spreading differently.

Hey, we've agreed a couple times today. Cool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. Heard from friend in Canada, felt in Toronto!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. The Montreal Gazette also reported it being felt there. (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawson Leery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
9. I have lived through a number of S. Cal. quakes.
We barely felt the Northridge quake although it damaged the walls of our house and the foundation.

It's the way we build -- in part. In general, Southern Californians are as prepared for earthquakes as you can be. Although I suspect that some of our bridges and public buildings will crumble in the next one.

On the East Coast, people live in brick houses -- very unsafe in earthquakes -- and buildings are less likely to be earthquake-proof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Very true about building codes
They're now reporting more and more damage to buildings here, particularly in DC. The Smithsonian Castle seems to have suffered damage as has the National Cathedral.

My partner's neighbor, in Alexandria, VA, has a window fall out of an upper story of her house.

Further, we have no clue how to act in an earthquake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Well, this will be a stimulus to the construction industry.
God's job program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeff47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. To be fair, a large number of those "brick" buildings just have a brick facade.
All brick construction stopped being common around 1900 when bricks started getting more expensive. A facade just needs one layer of brick, a real brick wall needs at least two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC