Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

England's experiment with handling the chronically unemployed:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 10:59 AM
Original message
England's experiment with handling the chronically unemployed:
Edited on Thu Aug-11-11 11:08 AM by hedgehog
I was listening to a discussion this morning of England's problem with people who have never held jobs, some from families where no one has worked for several generations. Poorly educated, these people live on the dole and are a constant source of criminal activity from petty thievery to hooliganism to riots.

Yet - England has run a successful multi-generational experiment to find a solution to this problem. The members of the family in question tend to have mess-up personal lives. One member married a naive woman much younger than himself, then proceeded to carry on a long term adulterous relationship.



Younger members display their lack of education with examples of extreme poor taste:



Younger members also tend to misbehave in public:



Yet, all in all, this family doesn't cause too many problems for the general public.

What's the critical difference between this family and all the others on the dole? This family's public housing tends to be rather grand:



they are encouraged to play dress up:





and they are given busy work to keep them occupied:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. Epic Fail
The Royals don't need to loot...it's handed to them...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. "Unemployed"? Prince Harry is in the military, and has served in Afghanistan.
Edited on Thu Aug-11-11 11:05 AM by Nye Bevan
The British Ministry of Defence and Clarence House made a joint announcement on 22 February 2007 that Prince Harry would be deployed with his regiment to the front line in Iraq, to serve as part of the 1st Mechanised Brigade of the 3rd Mechanised Division – a move supported by Harry, who had stated that he would leave the army if he was told to remain in safety while his regiment went to war;<20> he said: "There's no way I'm going to put myself through Sandhurst and then sit on my arse back home while my boys are out fighting for their country."<21> Then head of the British army, General Sir Richard Dannatt, first said on 30 April 2007 that he had personally decided that the Prince would serve with his unit in Iraq,<22> and Harry was scheduled for deployment in May or June 2007, to patrol the Maysan province.<23> By 16 May, however, Dannatt announced that Prince Harry would not serve in Iraq;<24> concerns included Harry being a high-value target (as several threats by various groups have already been made against him) and the dangers the soldiers around him would face should any attempt be made on the Prince's life or capture. Clarence House made public the Prince's disappointment with the decision, though he said he would abide by it.<25> In May 2007, British soldiers in Iraq were reported to be wearing t-shirts bearing the statement "I'm Harry!"; a reference to the scene in the movie Spartacus in which the survivors of Spartacus's army, defeated by Roman legions, are offered leniency by Crassus if they will identify their leader. Every survivor declares: "I'm Spartacus!"<26>

It was reported, in early June 2007, that Prince Harry had arrived in Canada to train, alongside soldiers of the Canadian Forces and British Army, at Canadian Forces base Suffield, near Medicine Hat, Alberta. It was said that this was in preparation for a tour of duty in Afghanistan, where Canadian and British forces were participating in the NATO led Afghan War;<27> rumours that were confirmed in February the following year, when the British Ministry of Defence revealed that Harry had secretly been deployed as a Forward Air Controller to Helmand Province in the Asian country.<28> The revelation came after the media – notably, the German newspaper Bild and Australian magazine New Idea<29><30> – breached the blackout placed over the information by the Canadian and British authorities.<31> It was later reported that, while in Afghanistan, Harry had called in United States Air Force air strikes,<32> helped Gurkha troops repel an attack from Taliban insurgents,<33> and performed patrol duty in hostile areas.<34> His tour came 735 years after his ancestor, Edward I of England (then Prince Edward), had also been on military duty in the Middle East during the Ninth crusade,<35> and also made Harry the first member of the Royal Family to have served in a war zone since his uncle, Prince Andrew, Duke of York, flew helicopters during the Falklands War; at the time, Andrew was second in line to the thrones of the Commonwealth realms. For his service, Prince Harry was decorated with the Operational Service Medal for Afghanistan by his aunt, the Princess Royal, at the Combermere Barracks in May 2008.<36>

In October 2008, the news was revealed that Prince Harry was to follow his brother, father, and uncle with the wish to fly military helicopters. After passing the initial aptitude test, he was to undertake a month-long course; depending on whether or not he passed that course he would proceed onto full flight training in early 2009.<37> Harry had to pass his flying assessment at the Army Air Corps Base (AAC), Middle Wallop, the result of which determined if he would pass on to train as a pilot of either the Apache, Lynx, or Gazelle helicopter.<38>

Prince Harry was presented with his flying brevet (wings) by his father, on 7 May 2010 at a ceremony at the Army Air Corps Base (AAC), Middle Wallop. Prince Harry had also let it be known that he intended to fly Apache attack helicopters if he was successful in passing the rigorous Apache training course; after which time it could be possible for him to see active military service once again on the frontline in one of the warzones.<39> During the ceremony, he switched his Blues and Royals' Officer's Service Dress cap for that of the Army Air Corps' sky blue beret with a Blues and Royals badge.

On 10 March 2011, it was revealed that Prince Harry had passed his Apache flying test and he was awarded his Apache Flying Badge on 14 April 2011. There is speculation that he shall return to Afghanistan once again before the withdrawal in 2015. On 16 April 2011 it was announced that Prince Harry had been promoted to the Army rank of Captain after having held the rank of Lieutenant since 2008.<40>

In June 2011, Clarence House announced that Prince Harry on completion of his training conversion course to use Apache helicopters in the war arena would be available for deployment, including in current operations in Afghanistan in his role as an Apache helicopter pilot. The final decision will ultimately rest with the Ministry of Defence's senior commanders including principally the Chief of the Defence Staff in consultation with the wishes of Harry, his father the Prince of Wales and The Queen.<41>


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_harry

Not exactly "the dole".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HipChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. He's not exactly struggling to make ends meet...I knew people that left Uni with degrees
and still couldn't find a job...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Perhaps they should try the military?
If they are willing to go to Afghanistan, like Prince Harry, it might be worth a shot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HipChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. How? When they can't get in? Instead, the UK has been recruiting from the Caribbean
Edited on Thu Aug-11-11 11:17 AM by HipChick
with promises of granting folks that join, British citizenship after 5yrs....

Kinda 'outsourcing' the military, when you yourself can't get a jon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Defending royalty. now I have read it all. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. How many tours of duty did *you* serve in Afghanistan? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. and what does that have to do with anything?
this is the most ridiculous argument for defending royalty ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. This whole thread is ridiculous and none of our business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. It only became my business when...
Edited on Thu Aug-11-11 02:27 PM by Javaman
someone chose to defend a group of people that contribute nothing and get paid huge amounts of money only because they won the gene pool.

this is equivelent to defending the trust fund rich in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. saying that a combat zone helicopter pilot was unemployed
is going too far. royalty or not the kid is risking his life for his country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HipChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. The Palace ensured they were kept far from danger...

They couldn't afford the loss of the 'spare'..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. Right. Because helping Gurkha troops repel Taliban attacks is "far from danger". (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. I didn't say anythig of the like...
Edited on Thu Aug-11-11 11:44 AM by Javaman
I was responding to the op.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
10. Fabulous post
What's the difference between this family and Bin Ali from Tunisia? They too live off the public purse - one steals it openly and the other finesse's the looting as if they serve some purpose other than class divisions.
Bin Ali also had 100s of cars. Word is that the young daughter had ten of her own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HipChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Yeah..this is the same Royal family that wanted to use state poverty funding for their palace..
Edited on Thu Aug-11-11 11:34 AM by HipChick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. And that never created a scandal - can you believe it
Just wait for that diamond jubilee - no cuts there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. The British royals attract tourist money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
15. "flowers in the dustbin"
This song is looking fairly prescient in light of current events:

God save the queen
The fascist regime
They made you a moron
Potential H-bomb

God save the queen
She ain't no human being
There is no future
In England's dreaming

Don't be told what you want
Don't be told what you need
There's no future, no future,
No future for you

God save the queen
We mean it man
We love our queen
God saves

God save the queen
'Cause tourists are money
And our figurehead
Is not what she seems

Oh God save history
God save your mad parade
Oh Lord God have mercy
All crimes are paid

When there's no future
How can there be sin
We're the flowers in the dustbin
We're the poison in your human machine
We're the future, your future

God save the queen
We mean it man
We love our queen
God saves

God save the queen
We mean it man
And there is no future
In England's dreaming

No future, no future,
No future for you
No future, no future,
No future for me

No future, no future,
No future for you
No future, no future
For you

"God Save the Queen" - Sex Pistols
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC