Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Americans Elect launches centrist third-party bid amid Washington dysfunction

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 11:47 AM
Original message
Americans Elect launches centrist third-party bid amid Washington dysfunction
With the dysfunction of Washington on full display as the nation inches toward defaulting on its debt, a coalition of American centrists has launched a bold gambit to nominate a third-party ticket for the 2012 presidential election.

Funded with at least $20 million, the majority from large, mostly unnamed donors, Americans Elect is vying to become the most serious third-party insurgency since industrialist H. Ross Perot nearly upended the 1992 presidential campaign.

And they're doing it in a decidedly 21st century way by creating an "open source" virtual primary in which the public is invited, via the Internet, to nominate a presidential ticket, ostensibly of moderates, and get the names on ballots in all 50 states.

Privately, political scientists say, some of the principals have debated a potential Gen. David Petraeus-Michael Bloomberg ticket as one possible outcome to challenge Obama-Biden and a potential Republican ticket such as Mitt Romney-Rick Perry. The group is also considering floating congressional candidates.

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2011/0729/Americans-Elect-launches-centrist-third-party-bid-amid-Washington-dysfunction
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. American Elect is full of shit because they won't reveal their funding sources nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. Here is some info on the known sources....
Edited on Sun Jul-31-11 12:34 PM by Forkboy
No Special Interest Funding for Americans Elect? New York Times reports “Serious Hedge-Fund Money”

When it comes to Thomas Friedman’s report that Americans Elect is “financed with some serious hedge-fund money,” there are two possibilities:

Possibility 1: Despite having a gig with the New York Times and going to interview Americans Elect in “its swank offices,” Thomas Friedman doesn’t know what he’s talking about here. This isn’t inconceivable: Friedman refers to Kahlil Byrd as “the C.E.O. of Americans Elect,” but current corporate documents show Byrd is actually the Vice Chairman and Treasurer while billionaire Peter Ackerman is Chairman. Americans Elect corporate bylaws specify that “The Chairman shall serve as the chief executive officer of Americans Elect.”

Possibility 2: Americans Elect really is awash with special-interest hedge fund money. Some other evidence pointing in this direction has already emerged. In a fawning promotional piece this weekend for the Daily Beast, No Labels co-founder John Avlon drops a useful statistic: that Americans Elect has raised $20 million from just 50 people, a whopping average contribution of $400,000 per person. Not just anybody can write a check for 400 grand; these are 50 mostly anonymous people to whom Americans Elect owes a big debt of gratitude. We know from other documents that two private investment executives have made donations to Americans Elect: Rockport Capital chief Peter Ackerman to the tune of $1.55 million and hedge fund operator Kirk Rostron in an undisclosed amount. Incomplete documentation of a “giving stream” to Americans Elect also names Melvin Andrews of Los Angeles as a contributor. Melvin Andrews of Los Angeles is the President of Lakeside Capital Partners. Outside of the capital investment business, but definitely in the realm of a “special interest,” is the donation to Americans Elect by Jim Holbrook, Chairman of the Promotion Marketing Association

http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2011/07/24/no-special-interest-funding-for-americans-elect-new-york-times-reports-serious-hedge-fund-money/

On Peter Ackerman
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Peter_Ackerman

On Kirk Rostron

Despite the appearance of this limited list via Piryx, there’s a lot of information that Americans Elect is still withholding from the American people about its financial activity. In this regard, Americans Elect is actually a step backward from all other political parties, which must and do disclose the names, addresses, occupations, employers, and dollar amounts of all contributions they receive above a small threshold. Around the country, Americans Elect is registering as a political party to reap all the benefits and ballot access — but it’s not playing by the rules for political parties when it comes to disclosure. For purposes of disclosure, it’s a 501c4 corporation, and even though it wants to arrange the election of your next president you don’t have the right to know who’s behind it.

Despite these limiting factors, we know enough to test the Americans Elect claim that “none of our funding comes from special interests or lobbyists.” If any donation to Americans Elect comes from special interests or lobbyists, then Americans Elect’s claim is untrue.

We’ve already documented one violation: Peter Ackerman, a man who has very particular special interests and who has funded Americans Elect. Here’s the name of another Americans Elect contributor with special interests, plucked from the Piryx giving stream: Kirk T. Rostron of Alexandria, VA. Kirk Rostron is a co-founder and managing partner of The Mt. Vernon Group, a private capital investment firm situated in a choice spot just four blocks from the White House at 1101 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington DC. Rostron specializes in managing hedge funds, having done so previously at Merrill Lynch, Hovde Capital Advisors and HedgeCall.

As a hedge fund manager and managing partner of a private capital investment firm, Kirk Rostron has special interests in various aspects of American economic policy, from regulation to privatization to transparency to taxation. Curiously enough, of the seven areas of policy Americans Elect identifies as relevant, it overwhelmingly focuses on economic policy in its delegate process. Within the 64 policy questions Americans Elect has deployed to shape the selection of its 2012 presidential candidate, the largest subset — a full 17 questions — has to do with privatization, deregulation and taxes, fixating on policy issues in a manner highly compatible with the special interests of well-to-do private capital financiers like Kirk Rostron.

http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2011/07/12/americans-elect-special-interest-funder-kirk-t-rostron-hedge-fund-operator/

On Melvin Andrews. This is from the Lakeside Capital Partner website...

Melvin Andrews is the President and Chief Investment Officer of Lakeside Capital
Partners (“Lakeside”). Mr. Andrews is one of the founders and owners of Lakeside.
Lakeside was formed in 1998 to be a new source of capital for the residential land
development and home building industry. As Chief Investment Officer, Mr. Andrews is
responsible for directing the strategic management and oversight of Lakeside, and each
investment made by Lakeside. In addition, Mr. Andrews oversees the management of
Lakeside’s investment holdings.

Mr. Andrews has over 25 years experience of establishing and managing equity
investments strategies and programs, and directly originating equity real estate
investments. Mr. Andrews was Executive Vice President, Chief Investment Officer and
co-founder of Olympic Realty Advisors (“Olympic”). Olympic was a partner with both
CalPERS and Shamrock Holdings, which is the family investment vehicle for Roy Disney
and is managed by Stanley Gold. In addition, Mr. Andrews was a Senior Vice President,
with Security Pacific Bank and directed all facets of real estate investments, joint
ventures, real estate development, the management of REO, and the restructure of
troubled real estate projects. Mr. Andrews' lending experience involved underwriting,
structuring and negotiating financing for residential and commercial projects developed
by mid-size developers in California, and office, regional mall and mixed-use projects by
large national developers.

http://www.lakesidecapital.com/management.html


On Jim Holbrook...

3. Jim Holbrook, who as CEO of the marketing firms Emak Worldwide, Neighbor and Upshot has special interests in the advancement of the marketing industry. More than this, though, Jim Holbrook is Chairman of the Promotion Marketing Association, a trade organization for the $750 Billion industry. The website of the Promotion Marketing Association makes it clear that it has special interests and is dedicated to pursuing those special interests in the spheres of American law and government. It has an entire section devoted to “Legal and Governmental Affairs”, with a publication entitled “PMA Legal Watch,” a “PMA International Law Book,” and an annual Marketing Law Conference. The PMA Bylaws stipulate explicitly that it is an organization dedicating to pursuing the interests of the promotion marketing industry:

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively as the premier trade association for the principal purpose of advancing the interests, addressing the needs, and serving as the preeminent knowledge source for those companies and individuals that have a professional interest in and/or utilize integrated and promotion marketing, and assisting them in better serving the interests of their customers and/or consumers, including by achieving specific, measurable, brand-building goals.

The key elements of this mission are… d. To promote and protect the interests of those who use integrated and promotion marketing techniques; e. To monitor, communicate and encourage an understanding of the laws and regulations that apply to the use of integrated and promotional marketing techniques; … g. To cooperate with federal, state and local government authorities for the good of the consumer, the community and the integrated marketing industry;

… Section 7 – No member shall engage in any conduct that is prejudicial to the best interest of this Association…


http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2011/07/13/despite-pledge-americans-elect-takes-special-interest-money-from-chair-of-promotion-marketing-association/


Update, July 29 2011: Another connection emerges. Douglas Schoen, who is on the Americans Elect Board of Advisors, is a pollster for No Labels and a promoter of a Michael Bloomberg candidacy for President.

Update, July 30 2011: Another connection emerges, although No Labels is shoving it down the memory hole. Conservative Democrat Will Marshall has been a Citizen Leader and active blogger for No Labels, and is now a member of the Americans Elect Board of Advisors.

http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2011/07/28/no-labels-and-americans-elect-a-list-of-known-connections/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Thanks for this info Forkboy. Time for some deeper reading. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. You're welcome.
I suspect I'm only scratching the surface here. They don't seem keen on telling people the sources. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, we all saw how well that worked LAST time
I can't even remember their name, but they collapsed like a house of cards, and nobody ever heard from them again after the summer of 2008. The End.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. Obama's pretty moderate. The Repub will be driven to the far right.
There's really no room for a third party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dameocrat67 Donating Member (442 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. There is room for a lefty third party if the dems continue to
pander the wallstreeters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
socialist_n_TN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Exactly. I hope it happens because it leaves it open
for a Progressive Worker's Party. AFL-CIO are you listening? Go ahead and get prepared to get on the ballot in all 50 states. You don't have to run candidates against good Dems, but everywhere else, GO FOR IT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dameocrat67 Donating Member (442 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. I hope this means the centrists are getting kicked out of the dems
because they already have a party right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. A third part won't work without a fourth party, too. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
7. With the donors not disclosed, I suspect this is funded by rightwing billionaires trying another
way to hurt the Democratic Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. Of course it is!!!!!! So anyone pushing this on DU is suspect big-time
watch for it... how else will the republicans win in 2012.

Lies, cheating, subterfuge etc. With the supreme court ruling the sky is the limit.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. You do, of course, know I'm not pushing this.
I posted it so we here would know what they're up to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renegade000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. Yes, that's exactly what America needs right now
Edited on Sun Jul-31-11 12:02 PM by renegade000
something even more "to the center" of the current administration. :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
socialist_n_TN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Hell I'd like to be "to the center" of the current administration
That would be further left than what we have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
socialist_n_TN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. That "open source" primary might through the Internet
might be a good place to see how much support Bernie would get. Kind of fuck up the "Third Way" meme going on, but it could be interesting anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. Any internet vote would be owned by the 4chan hackers
No-one has fixed internet votes as well as they have:

However, the results of the vote have nothing to do with influence. If you think that this is the result of a fair vote, think again. The entire first 21 results, as noted days ago, are the result of an elaborate hack done by 4chan users.

It’s surprising, thus, that Time pretends that everything is alright. From their article about the results:

“Moot denies knowing about any concerted plan by his followers to influence the poll, though TIME.com’s technical team did detect and extinguish several attempts to hack the vote.“

Erm, extinguish? The vote is obviously hacked. Time’s attempts to fix the damage came too late, and the 4chan folks managed to put the encrypted message back into order (if you read the first letters of the first 21 names on the list, the message reads “Marblecake also the game”).

http://mashable.com/2009/04/27/time-4chan-moot/


If they, or other competent hackers, had the slightest interest in setting the result of an internet vote, they would. An internet-only vote is just not secure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
12. Sure. Divide the right
Really, tho, Obama is a shoe-in as long as the dems don't go off the deep end. And knowing what I know about most dems, they won't go off the deep end.

If anybody wants to make a real difference, it will be by working to see that congress has an overwhelming number of dems come 2013....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
13. Hey, they will be competing with Jon Cowan's No Labels group.
That should be very interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
14. Unity '08 reboot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
16. Ah, they have fallen for one of the biggest lies in this country.
There is an extreme liberal left and an extreme conservative right that cannot function properly. There is no liberal or progressive political force in gridlock with anything. But lies have to proceed to maintain the lies of the corporate state. So things will remain the same and the American people will still believe in an alternative reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
20. Where is the demand for a "centrist" third party?
Have I missed something? Are there like part-time Teabaggers? People who want to mortally wound but not kill programs? People who don't want to ruin the country, but just put it into debt to loansharks? People who want to dislike and snub but not actually discriminate against minorities? People who only have batshit episodes a few times a year?

What happens if the public nominates strong progressives and insists that their values ARE moderate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demodonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
23. BEWARE VOTING FOR ANYTHING OVER THE INTERNET. (Yes I'm shouting.)

Internet voting has zero transparency. Worse than paperless electronic voting machines by +10,000 or more.

NO INTERNET VOTING. For anything even remotely connected to our public elections.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC