Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Norwegian Dominionist Slaughters Innocents

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
katanalori Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-11 08:13 PM
Original message
Norwegian Dominionist Slaughters Innocents
Norwegian Dominionist Slaughters Innocents

from Leah Burton at "God's Own Party"

"It turns out he is a self-proclaimed “Conservative Christian nationalist” who apparently was very active on a Norwegian-language anti-Moslem hate forum (compilation of writings, in Norwegian. ((warning: hate site))…and in Norway, there’s really only two possibilities (Dominionist or neo-Nazi)…and things MIGHT be thrown more to the “Dominionist” end of things as he apparently listed an anti-Nazi author on his now-defunct Facebook and media reports that he’s supposedly “pro-Israel”…

So far, much of the press on this has been in Norwegian-language sources, but the Australian Broadcasting Corporation notes that he was a “Christian fundamentalist”: At least one person familiar with Norwegian and who has been following reports (on a forum I’m a regular on) has even noted that “Christian DOMINIONIST” may be a more accurate translation…an article in the Jakarta Globe also points to “dominionist” without using the term. Apparently he went through confirmation at 15, which indicates he converted to a Dominionist church from a mainline Christian one…"


(snip)


"This is chilling information. These people – Dominionists – are full of hate and anger – convinced that this is justified by their twisted version of theology. And this is why we work so very hard to discuss the dangers of Dominionism. We understand how volatile these people are and how entitled they view themselves as God’s “chosen”. The rest of us are expendable…."

MORE:
http://godsownparty.com/blog/2011/07/norwegian-dominionist-slaughters-innocents/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-11 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. We got a few of them here, don't we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDJane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-11 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yes. And some oft them are in positions of power.
Edited on Sat Jul-23-11 08:45 PM by PDJane
Michelle Bachmann, Senator Jim DeMint, Ken Buck, Rick Perry...don't forget the members of "The Family." There's also Doug Coe and Edwin Meese.

Not to mention the failures; Chritine O'Donnell, Sharon Angle, Sarah Palin...the list goes on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-11 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. That has got to be one of the dumbest site's I've seen. Since when does
being confirmed at 15 make one a dominionist? I would love to know if he is a dominionist but I seen nothing so far to suggest that. From what I have seen the only reason that he is being touted as a fundamentalist Christian is that he posts on their web sites but I've seen nothing so far about his being a member of any Church.

The one thing we know for certain that the main target of his hatred are socialists as these are the people he targetted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katanalori Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-11 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I think you misinterpreted that sentence.........
"Apparently he went through confirmation at 15, which indicates he converted to a Dominionist church from a mainline Christian one…"

The author is pointing out that he WAS a mainline Christian(i.e. the "confirmation") - but that he later converted into fundamentalism/dominionism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-11 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. You right however the statement that he is a dominionist convert is totally
unsubstantiated. Without any links it looks like people are pulling this stuff out of thin air.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-11 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. "If it walks like a duck...
quacks like a duck, swims like a duck, flies like a duck, fucks like a duck, and tastes like a duck; it's a goddamned duck."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-11 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. That is baloney. This is not Through a Looking Glass. Words mean something
rather than meaning whatever you want them to mean. Dominionism is not just another term for far right wacko. If you have links to statements he's made that indicate he is a Dominionist please post them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-11 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Right, just like hating people for the color of their skin doesn't make someone 'racist'.
:eyes:

He believes what they believe, he acts like they would,He wants what they want.

Are you just determined to call a rose a cheese log?

I honestly don't know what this guy calls himself, but it doesn't make one fucking ounce of difference if he believes the same damn things that dominionists do.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-11 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Please cite where he states that he wants a theocratic government in Norway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-11 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Right after you cite where Michelle Bachman states that she likes plaid.
Because both are fucking irrelevant to their mutual objectives.

I get it, you refuse to believe that this guy acted on Christian Fundamentalist beliefs despite all evidence to the contrary. You've decided that you'd rather pick nits than acknowledge that this guy is a Christian fundie.

Live in that delusion as much as you want to. As if no proof that he's a Dominionist somehow means he's a fucking Quaker or Muslim.

Deny he's just like them if you want. That doesn't change the reality.

You want to pretend that Christian terrorists don't exist, fine. Don't try to fool yourself with semantics though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-11 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-11 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. I beg your pardon?
That's out of line considering that I've made a simple point that is supported by the facts at hand.

That you have resorted to that kind of insult only tells me I've hit a little too close to the mark for you.

I'll make this very, very simple;

"Do you deny that this asshole acted on Christian Fundamentalist beliefs/motives?"

It's a 'yes/no' question, so it should help clear things up a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-11 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. All that has been reported is that he has posted on fundie Christian web sites.
Edited on Sun Jul-24-11 08:57 AM by snagglepuss
I haven't read anything about his attending any church or writing anything that indicates he is anything but a nominal Christian. If there is information showing that he is consumed by religion I'd love to read it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-11 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. Dominionists are a problem, though. Anything that says you have the right to slaughter is wrong.
Edited on Sat Jul-23-11 08:50 PM by freshwest
That goes for everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kievan Rus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-11 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
11. I have yet to see anything that says he's a Dominionist
He's clearly a right-wing extremist, but there's nothing so far to indicate that he's a Dominionist.

This is a problem that tends to arise on DU every time there's a tragedy like this; people jump to rapid conclusions with why something happened. It most notably happened after Representative Giffords was shot in Arizona and everybody was blaming Sarah Palin's crosshairs map, when in fact Jared Loughner either never even saw the map, or was not influenced by it. Another time was the Census worker that was hung in rural Kentucky when some people blamed Teabaggers, the Pittsburgh gym shooting when some posters said it was a Teabagger misogynist run amok, and even the failed Times Square bomb plot when some said they thought somebody on the extreme right was responsible.

Freepers have a tendency to immediately blame everybody they don't like every time something like this happens; by doing the same thing, we're not really any better than they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-11 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. Must be nice to be omniscient.
How else could you know so much?

It's a 'fact' that Loughner never saw or was influenced by the map? Wow, that's pretty impressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-11 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
12. Nazi?
There I said it. He sure seems like a nazi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-11 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
13. In 2009 he posted that he believed the Protestant Church should convert "back to the Catholic"
Edited on Sat Jul-23-11 10:28 PM by Faryn Balyncd



A perusal of the Google translation of his internet posts does not seem to indicate that he is a fundamentalist of the evangelical variety, but rather a preoccupation with what Google translates as "kulturmarxisme / multiculturalism" more than religion.

He does describe himself as a Protestant who "votes for the most conservative candidate in church elections", but he also stated the following:

2009-12-09 17:14:41
Jeg er tilhenger av en indirekte kollektiv konvertering fra den protestantiske kirke tilbake til den katolske. I am a supporter of an indirect collective conversion of the Protestant church back to the Catholic.


It would appear from many of his posts that he is preoccupied with Islamization, multiculturalism, and European/Norwegian/Christian cultural identity.


Perhaps he has other writings which show more religious interest.


Here is a link to the Google translation of at least some of his internet posts:

http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&sl=no&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.document.no%2Fanders-behring-breivik%2F












Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CleanGreenFuture Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-11 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
16. Sounds exactly like the right wing in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC