Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If I hear this word one more time I will puke....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Roy Rolling Donating Member (762 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 01:23 PM
Original message
If I hear this word one more time I will puke....
"Privatize"

As in "privatize Medicare", or "privatize Social Security". That word should be stricken from use. The real meaning of that term is "profitize", as in "they want to profitize Social Security". It is not about "private versus public"---that is the propaganda these swindlers want people to swallow. The battle lines are drawn between citizen-sponsored programs versus corporate, for-profit sponsored programs.

And how can something be less expensive when you provide the same service PLUS squeeze profit out of it for company owners? It's a fallacy, it can't happen.

So the next time someone says "PRIVATIZE" correct them by saying "you mean "PROFITIZE".

It makes more sense---I do not want them to profitize Social Security.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Profitize would be correct definition
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 04:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. +2
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 05:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
18. It's worse than that, actually. Loot is more like it.
Profitize sounds as if they will earn profits when in reality it is usually just straight out looting from the public.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. PLUS ONE! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
36. +3 (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's better than rictus
Please don't turn this into a rictus thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. You make a good point.
They would not want to privatize if they could not make profits. Profitize is a more accurate term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thank you for bring this to our attention. I'll be using profitize from now on!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Urban Prairie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. Profitizing Medicare would obviously require denial of coverage for pre-existing conditions of
Edited on Thu Jun-23-11 01:54 PM by Urban Prairie
those born with and/or who eventually will acquire illnesses and diseases. So who in their "right" mind (that is, IF their illness(es) or disease(s) do not or have not as yet affected them mentally or their minds remain largely or completely intact) would even bother paying monthly or bi-weekly into a program or programs that would not reimburse health care providers for services rendered (or much more likely as yet un-rendered) that could be "somehow" linked in any way to their existing symptoms and condition(s), since many, if not most "for-profit" medical insurance companies already are notorious for denial of claims through using just those tactics?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevStPatrick Donating Member (564 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. That's very good!
I have long known that "privatization" meant squeezing profit out of something that was never for-profit before. This is an excellent way of framing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. Worked for the Pentagon and Halliburton.
Cheney, first as SecDef and then as Halliburton CEO, made sure of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ImNotTed Donating Member (250 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. I thought it was gonna be "Liberty"
Ever notice how the wingnuts use that word so much more often than "freedom"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salinen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
9. My pukeworthy term is
"shared sacrifice".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #9
25. There are many pukeworthy terms.
That is a good one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
58. Totally agree
because somehow the sacrifice is always "shared" by the lower class and always seems to totally bypass even a hint of sharing from the upper class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. Piratize and Parasitize are good synonyms
When not repeating a word or phrase for rhythmic emphasis, it is well to employ synonyms in your prose, to avoid monotony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. Profitize is exactly it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. Thanks! That's an EXCELLENT idea. I plan to use it well. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
14. Mine is Homeland
I was born in the Heartland and I want it back!

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
15. Actually it's more like 'exploit for personal gain'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gemini Cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
16. That's the word.
Profitize. Thanks, I will use this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 06:04 AM
Response to Original message
19. Very good!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atypical Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
20. New meme: Privatize = Profitize!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swilton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
21. You forgot to mention the other side of Tweedle Dee
'Deregulate' - the solution to all that ails us :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
22. "Privatize" already has a stigma attached to it
Which was why Bush in 2005-2006 called it "Personal accounts" for Social Security and not privatizing Social Security, which it really was.

Why change privatizing if it already has a stigma attached to it?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. The stigma isn't great enough
to illustrate the hardships it will cause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatSeg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #26
34. This is so true
There are so many people who still think making anything profit oriented is a positive thing. To them the "private" sector is so much more efficient than the "public" sector. They must be the ones who haven't lost their health insurance because of a serious illness yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #34
40. They never hear a contrary argument.
When we lost the media we lost everything. If single payer was discussed on TV by a panel of "experts" the American people would be sold. Unfortunately they have only heard manufactured misinformation about systems like the Canadian system. But the American people still favor a single payer system!

How much longer will the insurance industry and the for-profit health care industry be able to bully the American people into accepting overpriced care? The insurance industry should come around now so they still have a seat at the table. Because the American people are convinced -this system sucks and it needs to change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatSeg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #40
45. The "For profits" control the media
and as such, the message. Years ago medicine, health insurance, and pharmaceuticals were strictly regulated and were nonprofit. They weren't even allowed to advertise. Now we can see that there was a good reason for it.

Greed is always looking for an opportunity and without oversight or regulation, will do whatever it takes to make a profit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
23. K&R
Right when we should be removing the 'profit motive' from all health care everything the right wing fascists want to profitize even more of the health care system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
27. They should replace it with steal
they are looting the public good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stockholmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
28. commoditize is another synonym, and by this I do not mean to make plentiful, I mean that they want
to put a price on EVERYTHING so it can be financialized, and thus profited from, or put into a state of artificial scarcity by the so-called free market. The speculation and rigged-market crony-capitalism takes over, and gives you the present day paradigms of distortions and death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maine-i-acs Donating Member (989 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
29. Don't forget prisons and schools!
They are after that money too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
30. And expounded....Profitize for the RICH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Somawas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
31. "Steal" would be more accurate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #31
37. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
32. Profitize. Excellent! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vanbean Donating Member (957 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
33. This is the post of the month!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
35. Yes. Profitize is much more truthful that privatize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PADemD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
38. Permission to use this in a letter to the editor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
39. I always thought 'privatizer' fit GWB more than 'decider'
For them it's all about turning every goddamned facet of our country into a for-profit business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
41. How 'bout PIMP-itize, or Plunderize or BURGLARIZE???
Edited on Fri Jun-24-11 09:35 AM by grahamhgreen
Or PIRATE-ize, OR PILFER-IZE....

I think "profitize" is a little too heady.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
42. kr -- I'd also add that as we "profitize" we are further enriching corporate/fascism...
Edited on Fri Jun-24-11 09:35 AM by defendandprotect
which already has us by the throat --

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joanbarnes Donating Member (204 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
43. Use auto correct in your writing: privitize=profitize
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
44. private contractors soak the public

Like pigs at the trough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theophilus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
46. I'll see your "Profitize" and raise you "corporate media". I wish the
term "mainstream media" would vanish and be replaced by "corporate". Mainstream could be interpreted as a good thing. It's not true, anyway. The corporations own the media and it should be pointed out. Americans need to realize who the enemy is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BEZERKO Donating Member (564 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
47. Here's a better one:
Privateer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
48. Profitize is right
Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classof56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
49. Very good one--and thanks!
Have now added "profitize" to my lexicon.

Tired Old Cynic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
locahungaria Donating Member (194 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
50. May I join you????
:puke:

K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
51. HUGE K & R!
Spot on, RR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
52. It's not the same service, either.
Corporations are going to find every way they can to screw their customers. Besides privatized services costing more, they provide LESS service. That's one way corporations get more profit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ctsnowman Donating Member (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
53. K&R
Love the way you framed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
54. Plunder or Pillage would be more like it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
russspeakeasy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
55. great word, "profitize".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HillWilliam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
56. In this house, we use the term "piratize"
since it seems that's exactly what's happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
57. pop
That's the word that came to mind when I read the title. It's infected the English language from those idiot decorating shows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Glaisne Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
59. I hate all these goddamn conservative buzzwords and phrases
Edited on Fri Jun-24-11 12:23 PM by Glaisne
like:

privatize
deregulate
personal responsibility
free markets
tax cuts
fiscal responsibility
morality
job killing
states rights

it's all part of a plutocratic propaganda speak designed to push buttons and illicit responses from nonthinking ignorant flying monkeys and obfuscate the true agenda of the oligarchs. The country swallows this idiotic pablum whole while our country is systematically destroyed. It's part of a conservative narrative that sells people a fairy tale and hides their true agenda and it works because too many people are too lazy to think and learn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
60. And no one but anti-gov't cheerleaders need apply!!! because they will eject you and,
whatever it is, being a private economic entity, there's practically NOTHING anyone can do about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
61. Question re "profitize": Can't the same thievery apply to "non-profits", e.g. "faith-based initiativ
es"?

They may not make "profits", but they do provide jobs and in a down, jobless, economy, though there is no profit incentive, those jobs ARE funded on the backs of the poor, so anyone who rocks that boat, say, for standards or quality of service issues, find themselves completely expendable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
62. Get use to it - it is "profitize"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC