Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Endgame on the Debt Ceiling

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Derechos Donating Member (892 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-11 02:32 PM
Original message
The Endgame on the Debt Ceiling
snip

While the country will still be left standing after a debt default, there is one important sector that will not be standing: Wall Street. A debt default would almost certainly make all the major banks insolvent as they would have to mark down the value of U.S. government debt, which had been held as a completely safe asset. The loss of value would also apply to all the assets backed by the government, such as the mortgage backed securities issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Even when the economy revived, the U.S. financial sector would never hold the same place in the world as it does today. Without the ironclad financial backing of the U.S. government standing behind them, the Wall Street gang could never again be the dominant actor in international financial markets.

This fact is essential in understanding the endgame on the debt ceiling. Suppose that we get to the dates in August when the Treasury has reached the limit of its ability to shuffle accounts and literally can no longer pay its bills. Secretary Geithner will at that point make an announcement that in three days there is an X billion payment on Treasury bonds coming due. He will say that the government does not have the money in the bank and will therefore have to miss this payment.

The markets will then go into turmoil. We will see the same sort of plunge in the stock market that we saw when the House voted down the TARP the first time back in September of 2008. At that point, the Wall Street boys will be screaming their heads off at Speaker Boehner and the rest of the Republican leadership. The news media would all be running clips with depression footage, telling us that another Great Depression looms just around the horizon.

In this context the Republicans will do exactly what they did with the TARP. They will cut deals, make the threats and do whatever else is necessary to round up the votes needed to raise the debt ceiling.

When everyone remembers that this is what the endgame looks like, they will realize that there is no need to put essential programs like Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid on the chopping block to get Republican support for raising the debt ceiling. The gun is pointed most directly at Wall Street's head, and this incredibly powerful lobby is not going to let Congress pull the trigger.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dean-baker/the-endgame-on-the-debt-c_b_880531.html?ir=Politics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-11 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. I thought that the Republicans were all about "American Exceptionalism"
Yet, they're fully willing to ensure that a debt defualt- if and when it happens- makes it impossible to regain our former "exceptionalism"? :eyes: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-11 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is an important article with a very, very valid point.
I hope it doesn't do the usual DU drop. It would be even more potent if the Dems in DC understood this message - while playing chicken would be hard, it can't be harder than playing dead donkey.

Just wait them out like the article says - it's a no brainer from that perspective.

K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-11 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. And the U.S. Government's record of never having defaulted would be gone.
That's not something that could be regained. The U.S. would permanently be knocked down a peg, or many more, in international finance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Derechos Donating Member (892 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-11 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I think the point of this article is
that the Republicans are in a much weaker position politically than they are acting. Although they court the Tea Party, their political allegiences are two the Chamber of Commerce and the Financial Sector and thus would not let them suffer harm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alc Donating Member (649 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-11 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. Geithner has other options
Our revenue is high enough to service external debt. Medicare and SS are different classes of debt than what would cause a financial problem. Investors will be upset if "normal treasury bonds" are defaulted on.

SS trust fund has "special treasury bonds" which the government claims are the same. Investors look at the SS bonds and an internal bookkeeping gimmick (and rightly so as they are not on the books as debt and have not been managed as 2 separate books they way they a business would legally have to do). If anything, "defaulting" on SS bonds could help the stability of normal bonds. Investors will think we're serious about paying off our external debt and willing to sacrifice. Agreeing to pay off SS bonds in the class of other debt would increase our official debt by about $3.5 trillion and adding medicare will be higher.

If defaulting on external debt will hurt Geithner's friends but defaulting on SS bonds will only hurt SS recipients, which do you think he'll choose?

Also, republicans won't cut military budget, but Geithner could stop paying contractors and servicemen. While these are accounts payable, they are not debt in the sense of bonds. Or he can issue IOUs like California did a few years ago. Then he can use that money to service debt.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-11 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Defaulting on Social Security obligations would ensure Rethugs stay in power for a generation
if not forever.

While Obama may not be particularly beholden to SS recipients, it would be party suicide to let SS be raided while Wall Street skates again.

Suicide.

I just don't see it. If/when it comes down to Wall St. vs. SS recipients, Obama's gotta side with SS imho. I'm a deep cynic who doesn't trust this Admin very much anyway but even I believe he'll step up and face down Wall Street and get them to do the heavy lifting with the Rethugs to force the debt ceiling to be raised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
socialist_n_TN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-11 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. Bingo. As I've said all along, ever since this
shit came up, Wall Street wants the debt ceiling raised, so it WILL be raised. Now, they also want to cut government spending on anybody, but themselves, so they'll back the bluff of the Republicans as long as they can. But when it comes down to it, it IS a bluff.

When was the last time ANY Republican went against Wall Street? So, take SS, Medicare, and Medicaid off the table and CALL THEIR BLUFF!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-11 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. Bumping for the pm crowd. Great article. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TNLib Donating Member (683 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-11 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. I still don't understand how a few wackadoos in congress are holding the GOP, Wall Street and
our nation hostage. It's just bizarre.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
socialist_n_TN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-11 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. They're not. Not really...........
As I said, it's a TOTAL bluff. They'll fold without even a whimper if they're stood up to. But you've got to WANT to call their bluff. I'm not sure the Dem establishment want to call.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. Kick. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC