found this when searching for a clearer definition of notional vs. actual dollar value of derivatives. And it had been proposed by others back in the 1980's.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=103&topic_id=351988&mesg_id=352021http://american_almanac.tripod.com/derivcw.htm"...With what are now called derivatives, we move from investment, and purchases and sales of hard commodities, to speculating on the future price or yield performance of what were once investments, and relatively simple, economically necessary transactions. It would be like going to the horse races to bet, not on the race, but on the size of the pot. Who would care about what's involved with getting the runners to the starting gate?...
...proposed that America reassert sovereign control over its power of credit issuance through the transactions tax. The tax will also introduce transparency, and help show exactly what will have to be done to reconstruct the nation's rotten bankrupt banking system. Half of the $12 trillion outstanding derivatives in the U.S.A. are carried on the books of the top ten banks, like Citibank, J.P. Morgan, and Bankers' Trust. Their paid-in capital is many times exceeded by what they have helped to let loose.
Such tax proposals have been made before. The financiers fiercely resisted them, and usually prevailed..."