Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

You might be a security risk/untrustworthy if you are ---- unhappy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-11 08:00 AM
Original message
You might be a security risk/untrustworthy if you are ---- unhappy
Trying to prevent more WikiLeaks embarrassments, the Obama administration is telling federal agencies to take aggressive new steps to prevent leaks of classified documents, including instituting “insider threat” programs to ferret out disgruntled employees who might be inclined to leak classified documents, NBC News has learned.

As part of these programs, agency officials are being asked to figure out ways to “detect behavioral changes” among employees who might have access to classified documents.

A highly detailed 11-page memo prepared by U.S. intelligence officials and distributed by Jacob J. Lew, director of the White House Office of Management and Budget, suggests that agencies use psychiatrists and sociologists to measure the “relative happiness” of workers or their “despondence and grumpiness” as a way to assess their trustworthiness. The memo was sent this week to senior officials at all agencies that use classified material

The memo also suggests that agencies take new steps to identify any contacts between federal workers and members of the news media. “Are all employees required to report their contacts with the media?” the memo asks senior officials about the policies at their agencies.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40916433/ns/us_news-wikileaks_in_security/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-11 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. terrorists are always unhappy oddball loners, don't you know?
good americans are always happy & sociable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-11 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Especially don't marry a foreign woman - you'll lose security clearance immediately
Fuckers don't want our servicemen to be happy



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-11 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. Thats the idea of fault tollerance.
Edited on Wed Jan-05-11 08:27 AM by RandomThoughts
Or using some leak to find people interested in a topic.

So if you hear something good that might go against some structure, then they fear you might begin to understand what they are doing so then they use that to move on people that are interested in thinking about things and feeling. Also part of stuff like peace activist arrest, nothing new about that concept. However it makes some assumptions, and forces more control, which is downward spiral.

If done in a trickle, it can remove segments of society by blacklisting groups that have connections to something they don't like.

Nothing against the administration. But that concept is in 1984 where they have a group to find unhappy people, and then use various methods.

That is the concept of brush fires, or not stopping every fire so that brush does not pile up over decades then flames up all at once. However that is not a concept of the people showing something wrong or people in general, but the concept of many problems not attended to.

I know of that concept.


Also a possible reason why many countries started sites like wiki leaks. It should be checked that those groups are reliable to concepts of better ideals by showing they do as they stated, or they can be a PR dispersal area with a opposite information but a label in Orwellian fashion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-11 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. Much easier than actually preventing the behaviors that get leaked
Selling Pakistani boys into sexual servitude? No problem.

Revealing the transaction? Well, we can't have that, can we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KurtNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-11 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. so this new policy was 'leaked' to the 'news media'
It's Orwell's world and we're living in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-11 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. The thought police are coming! The thought police are coming!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-11 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
7. What else is he suppose to say...
if he says "YAY" for wikileaks then he would be accused of not caring about America and also a unamerican,terrorist,muslim...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-11 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
8. Crackdowns are great for morale!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-11 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
9. Oh weird. I just wrote this as a gag...
Javaman (1000+ posts) Wed Jan-05-11 02:54 PM
Response to Original message

16. Minority Report.

Thick neck security guy #1: Lt. you seem to be a little jittery...

LT: What? Oh, I'm sorry, my wife is in the hospital undergoing cancer surgery...

TNSG #1: Oh really, is that right. Well now, why are you acting so jumpy?

LT: like I just said, my wife is in surgery and I'm really worried.

TNSG #1: I don't think your wife is in surgery at all. In fact, I don't think your even married at all! I think you are stealing stuff!!! Wikileaking!!!

LT: WTF? is wrong with you? I'm your superior! you will stand down.

TNSG #1 into walkie: We have a code red! swarm! swarm!!

Security piles into the room. The Lt. screams for his life and gets hauled out.

TNSG #2: hey, isn't that the Lt whose wife is getting surgery for cancer today?

TNSG #1: yeah, that's him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC