Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Montana Cannabis Industry Association Launches Unified Defense Against SB 423

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 10:42 PM
Original message
Montana Cannabis Industry Association Launches Unified Defense Against SB 423

We’ve got a short time frame to do it, but we must stop SB 423 from being implemented and destroying access to medical cannabis in Montana.
http://www.mtcia.org/

Highlights of Montana’s New Rightwing Anti-Medical Marijuana Law

Patients
•Your existing card is still valid until it expires; you’ll renew under the new rules.
•The same medical conditions will continue to qualify you, but if your diagnosis is “severe chronic pain”, the new law is much more strict. The pain must be persistent and of severe intensity, and objectively proven by an X-ray or MRI, or a second physician must confirm the diagnosis after a physical exam.
•You must be a Montana resident.
•Once you have your card, if you do not choose a provider, you’ll be able to possess 12 seedlings, 4 mature flowering plants, and 1 ounce of usable marijuana. By choosing a provider, you give up your right to grow for yourself.
•Failure to notify the state of a change of address within 10 days voids your card.
•You must carry your medical marijuana card with you at all times.
•Parents wishing to register their minor children need a second doctor’s recommendation, must submit fingerprints for an FBI background check, and agree that the minor will never smoke marijuana, only use infused products.
•People under department of corrections supervision are not eligible.
•Gardens may not be combined and shared, unless you are relatives by blood or marriage.
•Drivers may be compelled via search warrant to provide a blood sample. 5ng/ml is cause for a DUI charge.
•If your drivers license is revoked for DUI, your medical marijuana card must be surrendered.


Caregivers
•A new “provider” registration process is supposed to be available by June 1st, 2011. Anyone who wishes to grow marijuana for someone else will be subject to a fingerprint background check by the FBI, as well as a financial background check (unpaid taxes, student loans, child support).
•If you do not get one of the new cards in June, you must bring in all your plants and product to local law enforcement for destruction before July 1st.
•You may choose to register as a “marijuana-infused products manufacturer” instead of, or in addition to, registering as a “provider” (grower).
•If approved, providers will be allowed to grow 4 mature plants and 12 seedlings each for up to 3 patients.
•Nobody can sell anything to anyone. No money, nothing of value may be exchanged for marijuana, except that the patient may reimburse the provider for the state application fee.
•Infused product manufacturers must use separate cookware from that which they prepare “normal” food, and are subject to local health department food preparation rules.
•You must carry your provider card with you at all times.
•Law enforcement will be automatically notified of the location of your garden. You may have only one. Law enforcement can conduct unannounced inspections during business hours.
•Gardens cannot be combined or shared.
•Must keep a complete set of records showing all transactions with cardholders (by name and ID number), open for inspection by law enforcement at any time during business hours.
•Advertising of any kind is prohibited, including via electronic media (websites, email). This provision is effective upon passage — mid-May.


Doctors
•Must describe in writing the medical condition, why it is debilitating, and the extent to which it is debilitating.
•Must confirm that they have assumed primary responsibility for caring for the patient.
•Must describe the range of other medications and treatments used to treat the condition.
•Must confirm that they have reviewed all other medications and supplements and considered their possible interaction with marijuana.
•Must confirm they have explained the potential risks of marijuana.
•May not affiliate in any way with providers or infused products manufacturers.
•May not examine patients where marijuana is being grown.
•May not offer a discount or incentive to a patient for choosing a particular provider.
•Will be reported to the Board of Medical Examiners if they recommend for more than 25 patients in a year. This will trigger a formal review of the physician’s practices, for which the physician will be responsible for the costs.
•Telemedicine recommendations will constitute “unprofessional conduct” under 37-1-316.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fly by night Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good luck. Hard to believe that Montanans are putting up with this.
The will of the people, consent of the governed, and all that.

BTW, I met a MIPS producer from Bozeman at the recent NORML convention who seems very politically connected and who was very well-spoken. I've tried to follow up with her (Misty Carey) but her business card contains no email address and neither does her web-site. If you know her and have her email address, please PM me with it. Thanks.

And good luck again. Big Sky country needs some seriously pissed off democrats (and Libertarians) to show their colors right about now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. Protestors greet the Gov. (whitefish video)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
felix_numinous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. Must explain the potential risks for marijuana?
Did they include police harassment, and the loss of your Constitutional RIghts? This is NOT the path to legalization, it is a path toward more police home invasions, since that is the only way they can enforce these standards.

I hope this is struck down.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC