Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate GOP kills consumer watchdog nomination (updated)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 12:39 PM
Original message
Senate GOP kills consumer watchdog nomination (updated)
Edited on Thu Dec-08-11 01:35 PM by ProSense

Senate GOP kills consumer watchdog nomination

By Steve Benen

Two months after the Senate Banking Committee approved Richard Cordray as the new director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the Senate leadership brought the nomination to the floor this morning. Republicans refused to allow a vote.

The Senate blocked confirmation on Thursday of Richard Cordray, the former Ohio attorney general picked by President Obama to lead the new Consumer Financial Protection Agency.

Democrats fell short of the 60 votes they needed in a procedural vote to move forward with the nomination of Cordray. Senate Republicans had spoken against the nomination, reflecting their concerns about the creation of the bureau, which was established in last year’s Wall Street reform bill.

Fifty-three senators voted for Cordray, while 45 — all Republicans — voted against ending debate on his nomination. Massachusetts Sen. Scott Brown (R) voted for Cordray, and Maine Sen. Olympia Snowe (R) voted present.

<...>

It’s hard to overstate how outrageous today’s filibuster really is.

<...>

And in this case, the bureau’s mandate involves protecting American consumers against possible abuses. Republicans don’t want Americans to have those protections, and would prefer to let the free market do as it will, no matter how often or how severe the public gets screwed.

Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) checked with the Senate Historian’s office this week, and found that this is the first time in history that a party has blocked a qualified nominee solely because it does not like the existence of the agency the nominee was selected to lead.

more



Updated to add this from Think Progress: Sen. Mike Lee Admits He Filibusted CFPB Nominee To Sabotage The Agency

Earlier today, 53 percent of the Senate voted to move forward with Richard Cordray’s nomination to lead the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau — depriving him of the supermajority he needs in order to be confirmed. One of the senators joining this filibuster, Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT), was uncharacteristically candid about why he helped build this wall of obstruction — he simply wants to sabotage the agency:

I have met Mr. Cordray, and my decision to oppose his confirmation by the Senate has nothing to do with his qualifications. Rather, I feel it is my duty to oppose his confirmation as part of my opposition to the creation of CFPB itself. <...> Confirming any director for this bureau would be tantamount to agreeing that we need a uniquely powerful super-agency that is not even designed to prevent a repeat of the financial crisis. Until the CFPB is reformed, I will not support it in any way.

Simply put, this is nothing less than a direct assault on the rule of law. The CFPB was created by an Act of Congress and can only be repealed or modified by an Act of Congress. By his own admission, Lee’s filibuster is an attempt to make an end run around the Constitution’s legitimate lawmaking process.

<...>


Refresh | +1 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. BO's comments on this
Mark Knoller (CBS) tweet
Pres. Obama says he hopes Republicans who blocked Cordray nomination "come to their senses," but not ruling out any option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. This should not surprise anyone. The only thing that is surprising is the garbage the repukes have
been throwing at the Obama administration for the last 3 years, and they have not even fought back

Now he is on the campaign trail talking tough
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Before
"The only thing that is surprising is the garbage the repukes have been throwing at the Obama administration for the last 3 years, and they have not even fought back"

...the Republicans caught on that filibustering wasn't enough and began to block recess appointment, the President made a couple of good ones: Donald Berwick to head the CMS and Craig Becker to the NLRB board.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. On a cloture vote, "present" or not voting are the same as voting no
Olympia Snowe was once better than this. What did she think that she was accomplishing by voting present? The effect was identical to all the "no"s. In a way, it is worse, as it indicates she knew NO was wrong, but did not have the courage of her convictions to vote yes - even when cloture still would have failed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Cigar11 Donating Member (276 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. The GOP has cashed the Lobbyist Checks … so they have to follow through. Consumer be Damed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC