Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Human Rights Campaign Endorses President Barack Obama for Reelection

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 12:50 PM
Original message
Human Rights Campaign Endorses President Barack Obama for Reelection

Human Rights Campaign Endorses President Barack Obama for Reelection

“President Obama has improved the lives of LGBT Americans more than any President in history,” said HRC President Joe Solmonese.

Washington – The Human Rights Campaign, the nation’s largest lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender civil rights organization, today announced its endorsement of President Barack Obama for reelection. The decision was made based on the President’s demonstrated commitment to LGBT equality and his record of accomplishment, from major legislative victories to critical administrative reforms.

“President Obama has improved the lives of LGBT Americans more than any President in history,” said HRC President Joe Solmonese. “In 2008 we were promised change and profound change is what we got. More remains to be done and ensuring that President Obama is able to continue the forward momentum toward equality for another term is an absolute priority of the Human Rights Campaign.”

President Obama’s Administration’s record of accomplishment for the LGBT community includes:

  • Pressing for passage and signing legislation to hate crimes law – the first federal statute to explicitly protect LGBT individuals. [br />
  • Determining that the administration believes Section 3 of DOMA to be unconstitutional and refusing to defend the discriminatory law in court.

  • Requiring hospitals nationwide to adopt LGBT-inclusive non-discrimination policies regarding visitation.
In addition, the administration’s policies: added gender identity to the equal employment opportunity policy governing all federal jobs; permitted married same-sex couples to use their marriage licenses as evidence of a name change for passports and instituted more reasonable standards for changing a gender marker on passports; allowed the Census Bureau to release data on married same-sex couples; extended a number of benefits to same-sex partners of federal employees possible under existing authority; launched a National HIV/AIDS Strategy and efforts to target populations most at risk; required abstinence-only-until-marriage sex education programs be inclusive of and non-stigmatizing toward LGBT youth; and recognized LGBT families are protected under a host of laws from the Violence Against Women Act to family and medical leave regulations to housing programs.

More information on the President’s LGBT record is available at: www.hrc.org/ObamaEndorsement.

“The records of the other candidates seeking the presidency should be a wake-up call to fair-minded Americans,” said Solmonese. “As the fight for equality moves forward, President Obama is marching with us while the alternatives would stop us in our tracks.”




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. k&r -- More from the Human Rights Campaign:
link: http://theimmoralminority.blogspot.com/

Courtesy of the Human Rights Campaign:

From signature achievements like passage of the law to end "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" to administrative changes throughout government, President Obama has done more to improve the lives of LGBT people than any President in history. The following is a compilation of many of the actions taken by the Administration on LGBT issues.

Regulatory and Policy Changes

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) adopted a regulation ending the ban on HIV-positive visitors and immigrants.

The State Department reversed a Bush Administration policy that refused to use a same-sex marriage license as evidence of a name change for passports.

The Census Bureau overturned the Bush Administration's overbroad interpretation of the Defense of Marriage Act and agreed to release data on married same-sex couples along with other demographic information from the 2010 Census.

President Obama issued two Presidential Memoranda (in June 2009 and June 2010) directing federal agencies to extend whatever benefits they could, under existing authority, to the same-sex partners of federal employees. These include sick and funeral leave, long-term care insurance, travel and relocation assistance, child care subsidies, and certain retirement benefits. The State Department extended numerous benefits to the partners of Foreign Service officers, including diplomatic passports, access to overseas medical and training facilities, inclusion in housing allocations, and access to emergency evacuation.

The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) added gender identity to the equal employment opportunity policy governing all federal jobs.

The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) proposed regulations recognizing LGBT families for federal housing programs, prohibiting discrimination against LGBT people in accessing federally-insured mortgage loans, and requiring HUD grantees to abide by LGBT-inclusive state and local antidiscrimination laws. HUD also announced it would conduct the first-ever nationwide study of LGBT housing discrimination.

President Obama issued Presidential Memorandum in April 2010 directing HHS to issue regulations requiring all hospitals receiving Medicaid and Medicare to prohibit discrimination in visitation against LGBT people. HHS issued regulations that went into effect in 2011.

HHS rescinded provisions of a Bush-era rule which allowed health care providers to refuse to provide any health care service or information for a religious or moral reason.

The federal Prison Rape Elimination Commission proposed national standards to reduce sexual abuse in correctional facilities, including standards regarding LGBT and intersex inmates. In early 2011, the Justice Department proposed regulations to implement those standards.

HHS's Advisory Committee on Blood Safety and Availability reviewed the lifetime ban on blood donation by gay and bisexual men, concluded that it is a "suboptimal" policy that screens out low risk donors and called on HHS to conduct research to support a move to a policy based on risk behavior, regardless of sexual orientation.

The Department of Justice issued an opinion clarifying that the criminal provisions of the Violence Against Women Act related to stalking and abuse apply equally to same-sex partners.

The Department of State revised the standards for changing a gender marker on a passport, making the process less burdensome for transgender people.

The Department of Labor issued guidance clarifying that an employee can take time off under the Family and Medical Leave Act to care for a same-sex partner's child, even where the partner does not have a legal or biological relationship to that child.

HHS revised its funding guidance around abstinence-only-until-marriage sex education programs, requiring that recipient programs are inclusive of and non-stigmatizing toward LGBT youth, and mandating that they include only medically-accurate information.

HHS awarded a $900,000 grant for the creation of a national resource center on LGBT aging issues to Services & Advocacy for Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual & Transgender Elders (SAGE). HHS also awarded a $13.3 million grant to the L.A. Gay and Lesbian Center to create a model program supporting LGBT and questioning youth in the foster care system.

At the request of HHS, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) issued a lengthy report in March 2011 detailing the range of areas in which more research is needed on LGBT health needs.

In March 2011, HHS sent a number of recommendations to the White House for policy and regulatory changes that HHS could undertake to improve the health of LGBT people, including: collection of LGBT health data, guidance for states on including LGBT families in federal welfare programs, and guidance for states on protecting the financial resources of a same-sex partner when his or her partner enters long-term care under Medicaid.

Support of Pro-LGBT Legislation

The President signed the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act into law.

The President signed the Don't Ask, Don't Tell Repeal Act of 2010 into law, after including DADT repeal in the 2010 State of the Union address and brokering a compromise with the Pentagon that honored both the legislative calendar and the Pentagon process.

Administration officials testified in support of ENDA in House and Senate in the 111th Congress.

Administration officials testified in support of the Domestic Partnership Benefits and Obligations Act, which would extend spousal benefits to the partners of federal workers, including health insurance and insurance benefits.

The Department of Justice announced that it would stop defending lawsuits brought against Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), because the President and Attorney General believe that provision is unconstitutional.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Thank You.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNBrewer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. This tired list is underwhelming and insufficient
That Obama is better on GLBT issues than any previous president is true, and not a very hard threshold to meet. Better, but still not very good, being as god's in the mix, and all.

HRC does not represent the GLBT DUers to any significant extent. This endorsement is basically ass-kissing, and an effort to sell a package of hotdogs as Grade A steaks to the GLBT community.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Joe Solmonese on behalf of the some 500,000 members of the HRC disagrees.
Edited on Sat May-28-11 08:22 PM by AtomicKitten
So, there's that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Safetykitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. Very true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. And there are TWO more sections on the link below

The last two sections 'Personnel' and 'Other Pro-LGBT Actions' are on the link below
http://www.hrc.org/ObamaEndorsement/


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. Excellent. Thanks for the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. K & R
to 0?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R.
But let's remember that this is not some sort of "gift" Pres. Obama has given to the LGBT community, okay?

Solomonese is correct, I think, when he says:

“As the fight for equality moves forward, President Obama is marching with us while the alternatives would stop us in our tracks.”


Emphasis added.

Too often, it seems LGBT activism and political maneuvering is discounted, if not greeted with outright hostility.

Fortunately, it does not appear Pres. Obama feels that way.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lionessa Donating Member (842 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well then that group entirely loses my respect.
How ridiculously blind does a group have to be to make a decision based on the psuedo-improvement after two years of wishy washy support for one group (LGBT), while ignoring authorizing assassinations of citizens abroad, drones killing innocents, Gitmo still ongoing, and Patriot Act still unconstitutional being heralded, and mmj growers being terrorized and jailed. Yeah, Human Rights under Obama are not any better and seem in fact much worse simply because of the sleight of hand he been playing all along on most of these issues.

Then that being said, none of the LGBT'ers I know feel like he's done much for them at all, tiny baby steps he seemed uncommitted to
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Just FYI, the Human Rights Campaign is focused solely on LGBT matters.
I know the name can be confusing, but HRC does not focus on the wider human rights issues that you mentioned, important though they are.

:hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lionessa Donating Member (842 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Actually that just gives me yet another reason to lack respect for them.
Names of orgs should represent what they do. I don't like it when Repubs do this crap using tricky language and bogus signs to interrupt a woman's right to choose, and I don't like it here. If they are only concerned with the rights of LGBTs then they are not an inclusive human rights org and should state so clearly in their name like the NAACP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Well, I guess it's true.....you can't please everyone. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. Nice endorsement..
Hope this helps clear up some misconceptions with those who have criticized him in the past on LGBT issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. HRC itself has "criticized Obama in the past"
"on LGBT issues"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. well, that makes it even better..
over time they have come to the realization that the President is actually on their side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Over time Obama realized he'd better get on their side
and they're giving him credit for realizing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I dont think that's quite accurate but..
if it makes you feel better to look at that way, feel free.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Ding!
Edited on Sat May-28-11 06:03 PM by Zenlitened
:thumbsup:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. Dong!
:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
15. I think they should have endorsed in both primaries
Gary Johnson has endorsed civil unions at the federal level and Fred Karger is openly gay and in favor of marriage equality. An endorsement of one or both of them in the GOP primary would have been a good thing. I admit neither have any shot at the nomination but still, an endorsement on principle would have been a great thing. After they lost, then endorse Obama over the GOP winner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidpdx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
19. I'd love to see more people caring about what is going on in North Korea
if we are really talking about human rights. Most people in the US know so little about what is going on in NK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
20. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
individual rights Donating Member (85 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
22. It's a bit early for endorsements, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Nope. They already know who they're supporting. Why wait?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Why?
Do you think there's going to be a strong primary challenge to President Obama?

Or would the HRC endorse a Republican?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
27. Between Bin Ladin, addressing both houses in the Brit parliament and now this...
that man is having one HELL of a month of May. :applause: :applause::applause: :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC