Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cantor: GOP looking at cutting budget for White House

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 12:08 PM
Original message
Cantor: GOP looking at cutting budget for White House

Cantor: GOP looking at cutting budget for White House
By Michael O'Brien - 09/28/10 05:40 AM ET


Republicans in Congress might move to slash the White House budget if they win back control of the House, Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-Va.) suggested Monday.

Cantor, the second-ranking House Republican who would likely become majority leader under a GOP-controlled House, said that a new majority might axe White House and congressional salaries and budgets as part of cost-saving reforms.

"We're also looking at cutting into, seriously, the budgets in the White House and Congress," Cantor said Monday evening on CNBC. "The executive wing of the White House, the West Wing, the salaries there, over the the last year, have gone up just $4 million."

snip//

A move to cut the White House budget, though, might be seen as a particularly direct shot by a newfound GOP majority against the Obama administration.

Cantor touted the idea as just one example of the specific proposals Republicans have to cut the deficit under the "Pledge for America" agenda that House Republicans released last week.

more...

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/121233-cantor-gop-looking-at-cutting-budget-for-white-house
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Great
$4 million in salary cuts, 1.6 trillion in tax cuts for the rich. Yeah, that's balancing the budget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. More brilliant Republican Math.
If these nuts win we are screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. As I recall Obama ordered a pay freeze for all WH Staff making over $100,000
So below that you are really eating into the salaries of working people.

Are they going to cut the pay of a dishwasher who works in the kitchen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
young but wise Donating Member (760 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I wouldn't put anything pass Repubs because they are nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
19. Sure, and when the butthats had the majority ...
when Bushco was president, they really cut into the white house budget then, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. Again, how much more do people need to see before they go to the polls
and vote? Is this what they want? They would basically throw away their vote from 08 too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Maybe they need to see Eric Cantor and Sharon Angle and slime like that in a leadership role,
and then they would wake up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. They would just wallow more in their own misery
and blame Obama and everyone else because they themselves failed to follow through from 08 to 10.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. Let me guess they'll cut his secret service protection to 2 dudes with walkie talkies. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. first thought I had also.
With threats quintupled. Now that's reform that Repugs can believe in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustAnotherGen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-10 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
28. My first thought too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parker CA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. These fools are such f-ing idiots. Never ceases to amaze. Mega fail constantly. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. talk about measuring for curtains...could they at least wait til 2011?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. They're looking to run the Black man out of the White House.
How much plainer does it need to be?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GSLevel9 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. yup...
(subliminal message) "and while you're at it boy... move y'all self and yer family back to the servants quarters..."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
11. Might be seen as a slam at administration?
How about it is a slam? They wouldn't dream of doing this if it were a repub in office...it's meant as disrespect...a way to cheapen the POTUS...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-10 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #11
25. Absolutely
they do nothing with any honorable intention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
13. I can't stand that guy

Creepy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxrandb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
15. Unfortunately, some of the "masses" eat this shit up
"Look! Look at us! We're punishing the 'elites'"!!

Cutting $4 Million out of $13 trillion is like removing a grain of sand from the Mojave Desert, but it doesn't matter. All people will hear is "we're cutting White House Staff", and they'll be convinced that Repubs give a shit about the deficit.

Think about it. That shit worked back in 1994...right up until they started closing national parks and skipping Social Security payments. When people actually started to feel the "small government" impacts, the rubes got butchered. All Repubs need to do is "pretend" they are "tough" on Washington until 2 November 2010.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
17. so in year 2 of the Obama admin, salaries went up $4mil
how much of that is due to filling positions that weren't filled in the first year, I wonder? What is the comparison to the Bush WH?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unvanguard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
18. That's pennies compared to the size of the federal budget.
This is politically-motivated posturing and nothing more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
20. Image a Dem trying to cut the budget to the War President's (Dimson's) budget
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-10 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #20
26. Unthinkable, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
21. De-fund, demoralize, destroy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KBlagburn Donating Member (409 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-10 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
22.  October 18, 2010 White House releases 2010 salary report,
http://dailycaller.com/2010/07/06/white-house-releases-2010-salary-report-showing-budget-increase-of-4-5-million-over-final-year-of-bush-administration/

In the 2010 report, the lowest salary for a full-time employee is $37,826 for a records management analyst. In 2008, it was $33,400 for a staff assistant. In fact, in the Obama White House, only two full-time staffers make below $40,000, and they’re just shy of $38K.

Compare that to the Bush White House, where a total of 85 staffers in 2008 made below $38,000.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-10 06:55 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. OMG, they rose low salaries. Only freepers would consider this bad.\nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-10 06:19 AM
Response to Original message
24. cutting the budget for the Commander in Chief while the nation is at war--image the Media outcry if
Dems had proposed something like this during the Bushler Admin. The Networks would have been calling for the heads of the treasonous bastards. Today, not so much as a peep, from the same group that lead the nations with the drums of war leading to IRAQ. Our National Airways have been coopted by Right Wing Thugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-10 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
27. Cantor is an asshole...
and the R's ain't gonna win the House back...he can spend $2.50 on a crying towel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC