Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

E.J. Dionne: The End of the Fox News Era?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 05:31 AM
Original message
E.J. Dionne: The End of the Fox News Era?
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_end_of_the_fox_news_era_20100725/

The End of the Fox News Era?
Posted on Jul 25, 2010
By E.J. Dionne, Jr.


The smearing of Shirley Sherrod ought to be a turning point in American politics. This is not, as the now trivialized phrase has it, a “teachable moment.” It is a time for action.

The mainstream media and the Obama administration alike must stop cowering before a right wing that has persistently forced its own propaganda to be accepted as news by persuading traditional journalists that “fairness” requires treating extremist rants as “one side of the story.”

snip//

The traditional media are so petrified of being called “liberal” that they are prepared to allow the Breitbarts of the world to become their assignment editors.
Mainstream journalists regularly criticize themselves for not jumping fast enough or high enough when the Fox crowd demands coverage of one of their attack lines.

Thus did Andrew Alexander, The Washington Post’s ombudsman, ask why the paper had been slow to report on, as he put it, “the Justice Department’s decision to scale down a voter-intimidation case against members of the New Black Panther Party.”

Never mind that this is a story about a tiny group of crackpots who stopped no one from voting. It was aimed at doing what the doctored video Breitbart posted set out to do: persuade Americans that the Obama administration favors blacks over whites.

And never mind that, to her great credit, Abigail Thernstrom, a conservative George W. Bush appointee to the U.S. Civil Rights Commission, dismissed the case and those pushing it. “This doesn’t have to do with the Black Panthers,” she told Politico’s Ben Smith. “This has to do with their fantasies about how they could use this issue to topple the {Obama} administration.”

Instead, the media are supposed to take seriously the charges of J. Christian Adams, who served in the Bush Justice Department. He’s a Republican activist going back to the Bill Clinton era. His party services included time as a Bush poll watcher in Florida in 2004, when on one occasion he was involved in a controversy over whether a black couple could cast a regular ballot.

Now, Adams is accusing the Obama Justice Department of being “motivated by a lawless hostility toward equal enforcement of the law.”

This is racially inflammatory, politically motivated nonsense—and it’s nonsense even if Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh talk about it a thousand times a day. When an outlandish charge for which there is no evidence is treated as an on-the-one-hand-on-the-other-hand issue, the liars win.

The Sherrod case should be the end of the line. If Obama hates the current media climate, he should stop overreacting to it. And the mainstream media should stop being afraid of insisting upon the difference between news and propaganda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dennis Donovan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 05:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Faux has been favored by the uninformed for too long...
...due to its flashy graphics, pro-wrestling-style interviews and ability to give the downtrodden a (false) scapegoat. I think it's a safe bet that anyone with an IQ above their body temperature stopped watching Faux for serious news long ago.;):hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Don't forget the Faux News Babes with their teeny-tiny skirts and pouty, glossy lips.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 06:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. I Wouldn't Get My Hopes Up
Look How Long the Reagan mythology is hanging on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Sad, but true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
droidamus2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. Agreed
Even when there are two truthful sides to a political point (Faux would say controversy) that doesn't mean both sides should or do carry equal weight. Let's take global warming as an example. If one side presents 10000 scientists (I just made up the number as an example) that say global warming is occurring and humans are at least partially responsible and the other side presents (we'll be nice to them) 100 scientists and employees of the petrochemical industry to say there is no such thing as global warming does this mean a true journalist would present the two sides in a way that seems to say that there is a question as to whether global warming exists? Would it make more sense if a journalist pointed out when a person pushing a particular view has a personal stake in the outcome or point out that a particular point of view doesn't really have that many adherents? If you are reporting the news and not doing opinion pieces just let the consumers of your news now how things really are and if that means it looks like you are being liberal or conservative so be it. If you want to give opinions then label them as such.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. News as entertainment
News is a commodity again, much like the days of "yellow journalism". Go see the movie/play call "Chicago" and realize that there was a time when that's how the newspaper industry worked. They have structured themselves a tad different, and of course the medium is now radio and TV. But they have created this world in which they present little, if any, "news" and they deliver alot of "opinion". It is all aimed at the same consumer, at the same time, with little concern about differentiating between the two. And that is the core problem.

Yes, there is a larger problem that journalism somehow got caught in the trap that if there are two differing point so view, the "fair and balanced" thing to do was to present them both. Never mind that they weren't grounded in the same basis of expertise or evaluation. One guy does 30 years of research and testing on his point of view, another guy has a hunch, and they are presented some how as opposite sides of the same coin. Facts are "arguable" some how. It is all a huge disservice to knowledge, learning, and logic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
7. K&R - this is as central an issue to everything else as there is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
90-percent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
8. Perfectly Legal
Edited on Mon Jul-26-10 09:21 AM by 90-percent
Legal precedent in a Florida Court Case has determined that it is PERFECTLY LEGAL TO KNOWINGLY LIE IN A NEWS BROADCAST.

http://ceasespin.org/ceasespin_blog/ceasespin_blogger_files/fox_news_gets_okay_to_misinform_public.html

We really have no idea what so ever if our news is based in truth and facts or complete corporate propaganda!

I will surrender my Constitutional rights as an American when they pry the fee internet from my cold dead hands. The internet is our only chance left to be reasonably well informed.

-90% Jimmy

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cal33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
9. "The Sherrod case should be the end of the line. If Obama
hates the current media climate, he should stop overreacting to it. And the mainstream media should stop being afraid of insisting upon the difference between news and propaganda."

But the mainstream media is 90% Republican-owned. They prefer prefer to
continue to obscure the difference, not clarify it, wouldn't you say?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
10. I doubt if it is the end of Fox News.
Since this incident unfolded their ratings have been great. The most recent ratings for last Thursday prime time have them beating the combined totals of the other news networks in both the demo and in total listeners. They also beat the combined competition in total listeners for the whole day, and came close in the demo.

http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/ratings/the_scoreboard_thursday_july_22_168675.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
11. Are you kidding? - they're just warming up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jester Messiah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
12. It should at least put one more arrow in everyone's rhetorical quiver.
"Fox? How can you believe anything they report after that whole Sherrod incident?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 02:36 AM
Response to Original message
13. FAKE News is not going to stop
I'm beginning to think there needs to be a counter-balance on TV. Not MSNBC. Not a centrist network with progressive anchors. But a full-fledged Progressive news channel. The question would be, who is going to fund it? Where are all of the Hollywood "liberals?" They love to look good on TV and appear to try to make a difference when World Aid comes around...but are they really ready to put their money where their mouths are? There's needs to be a counter-message to challenge FAKE News and not networks that follow their lead (CNN, MSNBC).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 02:47 AM
Response to Original message
14. From EJ's keyboard to God's screen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 03:58 AM
Response to Original message
15. K&R. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ross K Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 05:31 AM
Response to Original message
16. Recced in agreement
But I'm not holding my breath!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pkz Donating Member (595 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 06:10 AM
Response to Original message
17. Their lil experiment needs to end
constant brainwashing...it will take a whole generation to clean off the FAUX dribble
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 06:30 AM
Response to Original message
18. Fox is the most successful of the three cable news networks
if anything it will unfortunately continue to prosper and grow. MSNBC is warming to its model of ideologically driven news (although on the left), and CNN, to avoid collapse, may take a look at the same model.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
19. Who needs Fox when we have CNN?

Thank goodness for public television.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC