Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Media treats Breitbart as "simply a roguish provocateur. He's something much darker."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 07:43 AM
Original message
Media treats Breitbart as "simply a roguish provocateur. He's something much darker."
Joshua Green

The Breitbart Circus

Awhile back, particularly during the Clinton administration, the media would flagellate itself every so often for rushing, lemming-like, to cover some story or other that was being touted on the Drudge Report, and then, after a period of reflection, deciding that it shouldn't be. There was usually a Howard Kurtz column to demarcate such an episode. But the recidivism rate was high. Invariably, the media would chase the next Drudge rumor, and the whole cycle would repeat.

That doesn't seem to happen anymore, at least not with Drudge. But it does happen, and more powerfully than ever, with Andrew Breitbart, who has inherited Barnum's instinct for what will cause a circus and the certainty that suckers are still being born every minute. One difference is that Drudge usually focused on sex scandals and tawdry personal humiliations, which, in the end, is hardly worth getting worked up about. Yes, yes, shame on reporters for taking the bait. But c'mon.

Breitbart focuses on race. Today's episode with Shirley Sherrod, who was forced to resign from the Agriculture Department on the basis of a doctored and intentionally misleading videotape (see below), is an especially ugly case in point, calculated to stir the very worst racial resentments. This time the political world--the NAACP, the Agriculture Secretary--moved as quickly as the media world to unthinking response, and I suspect it happened precisely because race was involved. I don't doubt that the administration's understandable desire to avoid racial issues played a big part in how this turned out.

But what's galling to me--gut-wrenching, really, like watching old news footage of blacks being beaten and clubbed at lunch counters--is that Breitbart obviously understood the powerful effect his tape would have, posted it anyway, and then assumed the role of ringmaster, expertly conducting the media circus, fanning the flames. It's hardly the first time. But the moral ugliness of what's just happened is glaring, and it's hard for me to see how the media can justify continuing to treat Breitbart as simply a roguish provocateur. He's something much darker.


From a Daily Kos diary:

<...>

I am flipping though Morning Joe, CNN Morning and Fox and Freaks and apparently the hugestory here is that President Obama failed, NAACP failed and the USDA failed.

But what about Andrew Breitbart. And Fox News. WTF?!

This man deliberately put out an edited tape, falsely labeling this woman as a racist and causing her to lose her job. And the Media has nothing to say about that?


Fox News jumped the gun and put the tape on loop ALL DAY LONG. And now with egg on its face---the media has turned the story around and made it about the failure about the Obama administration.

Keith has stated (via Twitter):

Look at the full tape - Breitbart has just cut the RW media's throat

Well, unless someone actually calls out Breitbart and Fox Noise...I HIGHLY doubt this is the death of the RW media.

<...>

more



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. The media is complicit, they must spin or die off.
It would be good if they just faded away, but they'll try to bull their way through with the finger pointing...the wrong way. But we can make a difference by refusing to buy into their, and others, bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. OK, Fox was absolutely criminal here.
However, the Administration was stupid in thier premature and grossly overreactive response.

Fox deserves to lose their broadcast licenses over this, but the Administration also deserves an ass kicking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. The government needs to reinstate Ms. Sherrod and order a full criminal
investigation of the reich wing thrill machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. He is leading a charge in dismantling the NAACP.. they got away with it with Acorn
they are going after the NAACP.. we need to point to the piling steam that started this.. and not just let the media get away with .. " well we know how they are" complicity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. And DUers are climbing on board the 'dismantle NAACP'
train. (your name inspires! :))

That is troubling because it means breitbart is succeeding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Right now, that is actually scaring me.. that they will succed again
in taking down an organization dedicated to helping everyone. It was an admitted shell game by Breitbart to discredit the NAACP.. he admitted it on CNN..



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kjackson227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Try as they might, but it will be a cold day in hell before they bring...
the NAACP down. Not going to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
6. The straight media are on his side
I heard Maddow rip him and FoxNews to shreds last night. She who is not allowed equal rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. Is Breitbart associated with Murdoch?
Who set up Breitbart in business? What's his background?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. CNN hired this POS as a commentator
Breitbart IS mainstream media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I thought he was more Fox News Fake Journalism
If he had half a brain he wouldn't have dispatched O'Keefe into a federal office building to try to get something on Mary Landrieu. That kid surely didn't think of that on his own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. My mistake...I was thinking of that other RW bastard
the redstate.com guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
13. FOX - If you believe our lies, it's your fault.
I suppose they have a point. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC