Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GOP STEPS ON ITS OWN 'SHAKEDOWN' TALKING POINT....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-10 05:27 PM
Original message
GOP STEPS ON ITS OWN 'SHAKEDOWN' TALKING POINT....
GOP STEPS ON ITS OWN 'SHAKEDOWN' TALKING POINT....

It's hard to see how Wednesday's meeting at the White House could have gone much better. President Obama met with BP executives, told them how it was going to be, and BP quickly agreed. The result: a $20 billion pot of money that will bring much-needed help to workers, businesses, and families who've been victimized by a devastating oil spill.

The Republican response was quick: the relief fund is outrageous. The matter, the GOP said, should have been resolved in the courts. Obama pressuring BP on Americans' behalf was evidence of a "shakedown" and "extortion," which might have even been "illegal." How dare the president step up to secure needed funding for struggling families and small businesses in the region. The nerve. Hell, one key Republican official even apologized to BP for Obama strong-arming the oil giant into setting the money aside.

Yesterday, though, the Republican message seemed to shift a bit, at least in some corners. What was initially deemed an outrageous presidential abuse turned into a GOP idea that Obama shouldn't take credit for.

Rep. Trent Franks (R-Ariz.), for example, issued a statement yesterday implicitly arguing that there couldn't have been a shakedown, since BP intended to put $20 billion into the escrow fund before the White House meeting. "The true outrage," Franks said, "is that this was never the President's idea at all."

It wasn't just Franks.

On Thursday, Rep. Anh "Joseph" Cao told me that he pressed BP on the fund idea a month ago, inspired by the example of Exxon after its 1989 spill off the coast of Alaska. And on Friday I talked with Ray McKinney, another engineer, who is running for Congress in Georgia against Rep. John Barrow (D-Ga.). McKinney stressed that there was no serious disagreement about the escrow issue, and said Democrats were concocting a political debate when all that mattered was making BP pay and investigating the disaster.

First, there was considerable disagreement about the escrow issue, since the entire Republican establishment quickly rose up to trash the agreement, loudly and publicly.

Second, this new message completely invalidates the first. Simultaneously, we have Republicans saying Obama extorted the money out of BP and that BP agreed to the payment before Obama walked into the room. The president's efforts were scandalous, some Republicans are arguing, but the effort was a GOP idea.

Can't anybody here play this game? Just pick a message and go with it.









Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
droidamus2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-10 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Traditional
They are just reverting to the traditional Republican/wacko line which is 'Anything good that happens is because of what a Republican did or what Republicans kept the Democrats from doing. Anything bad that happens is because of a Democrat or because of something the Republicans couldn't stop the Democrats from doing or because the Democrats wouldn't do it the Republican way'. Therefore if they thought somethine was bad then it was Obama's fault but if the public decides it was good then it was a Republican idea to begin with. Don't forget Republicans/Conservatives are perfect and the world would be a utopia if everybody would just get out of their way and let them run things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4lbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-10 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, sure, ok, BP had planned the $20 billion escrow account before the meeting with the POTUS.
Because after all, big greedy corporations do this responsible thing all the time without being prodded into doing it. :sarcasm:

If BP had already decided to do this, what were they waiting for? They could have made the announcement weeks ago.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Empathic_1 Donating Member (47 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-10 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. OMG!
My eyes are bleeding!!!!


Please post a warning "GRAPHIC IMAGES AHEAD"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. In a strictly literal sense, BP probably did agree prior to the meeting.
I don't believe that Obama would have gone on national TV and stated that he was going to demand that BP put the funds aside if he wasn't darn sure that the deal was already largely done.

However, I also don't believe that BP wouldn't have done it without substantial pressure from the Federal Government, and maybe even from the British government, too.

If anyone believes that, I have a beautiful home in Alaska with a stunning view of Russia from the living room to sell. :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-10 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. "It's highway robbery, but we thought of it first, fuckers!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dccrossman Donating Member (530 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-10 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. ROFL, +1
K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. LOL. Exactly. Is there any low they won't resort to? Or any original idea they won't try and steal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dyingnumbers Donating Member (44 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-10 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. This isn't a shakedown...
Hell, one key Republican official even apologized to BP for Obama strong-arming the oil giant into setting the money aside.


This is a stick-up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-10 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. Strange, isn't it, how the language of the underworld sounds so
natural on their lips? 'Shakedown'. Top marks. Very evocative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC