Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Republican buisness people running for office, have we not been down this road before? RANT

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 08:07 AM
Original message
Republican buisness people running for office, have we not been down this road before? RANT
Edited on Thu Jun-10-10 08:23 AM by Peacetrain
Bush was a business person running for office. Remember all the hooting about his MBA.. forget the fact that every business he touched, he ran into the ground..

But here we go again. Ex-CEO's running for office to get the government back on track.

That is the last thing we need.

The United States government is not a buisness to play around with. We have almost been bankrupted twice in my lifetime alone, by first Reagan and then Bush the second, trying to lay a buisness model over a democratically elected government.

What we need in office are people who are experienced in government, not buisness!

I often wonder why people keep falling for that old chestnut, especially in the media about needing outsiders.. who have no experience in government.. to run government.

Business types are autocratic.. Democracy does not play into how you run an effective buisness. The very last thing we need is the buisness model to run government.

Enough is enough with inexperienced buisness people.

Give me someone who has worked in the system and understands it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. the voters probably can't afford to feed their families yet they will vote for these rich people
Somehow I think the poor seem to think by voting for someone rich they may get richer. Around here there have been many foreclosures and people are up to their ears in debt yet out they go to vote for these creatures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. It really makes me begin to wonder about cognitive abilities of the average person
This inability to connect the dots..

Every massive fail in government we have had in the past 50 years has been because people want to run a government like a buisness.

Most businesses fail.. and even the big guys go off the cliff after so many years.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. they are quick to blame the government if they lose their job though
shedding jobs through greed so the company can still make a profit and then these dodos don't have healthcare. Yet they complain about the government's health care rreform. Perhaps these people need to take classes on reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. Not to mention that many of the business types have ruined the businesses they worked for.
Case in point is Carly Fiorina.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Absolutely.. yep that is the last thing we need.
But they will gnash at the bit about a community organizer.. which is exactly what government is.. organizing groups..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yes, and then they will ruin government too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. BINGO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proudohioan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
7. I couldn't agree with you more!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Its amazing isn't it.. How the right keeps digging up the same failed model
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
10. You would think they'd have learned
after the example set by our first (p)resident with an MBA - Arbusto W. Fuckstick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. I was just reading about Carly Fiorina in another op
Edited on Thu Jun-10-10 08:41 AM by Peacetrain
Let me cross reference that

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x8528053

Just plain scary

EDIT TO ADD...(From the above link)

"In early January 2005, the Hewlett-Packard board of directors discussed with Fiorina a list of issues that the board had regarding the company's performance.<36> The board proposed a plan to shift her authority to HP division heads, which Fiorina resisted.<37> A week after the meeting, the confidential plan was leaked to the Wall Street Journal.<38> Less than a month later, the board brought back in Tom Perkins and forced Fiorina to resign as chairman and chief executive officer of the company.<39> The company's stock jumped on news of Fiorina's departure.<40> Under the company's agreement with Fiorina, which was characterized as a golden parachute by some, she was paid slightly more than twenty million dollars in severance.<41> When Fiorina became CEO in July, 1999, HP's stock price was $52 per share, and when she left 5 1/2 years later in February, 2005, it was $21 per share—a loss of over 60% of the stock's value.<42> During this same time period, HP competitor Dell's stock price increased from $37 to $40 per share.<43><44>"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC