Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who’s Responsible for the National Debt?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 11:08 AM
Original message
Who’s Responsible for the National Debt?
Who’s Responsible for the National Debt?
By Mike Lillis 6/2/10 4:28 PM

Annie just noted that the national debt hit a (somewhat meaningless) milestone this week, topping $13 trillion yesterday. As a quick addendum, it’s worth pointing out which presidents are most responsible for running up the national tab. We’ll go back five. (All numbers come from the Treasury Department, found here and here.)

1) Ronald Reagan (1981-1989): Inherited roughly $908 billion in debt, and took it up to $2.6 trillion. Change: +186%.

2) George H.W. Bush (1989-1993): Took Reagan’s $2.6 trillion up to $4.2 trillion. Change: +62%.

3) Bill Clinton (1993-2001): Took Bush’s $4.2 trillion up to $5.7 trillion. Change: +36%.

4) George W. Bush (2001-2009): Took Clinton’s $5.7 trillion up above $10.6 trillion. Change: +86%.

5) Barack Obama (2009-2010): So far, has taken Bush’s $10.6 trillion up to $13 trillion. Change: +23%.

......................

Note: This post has been updated so that the figures from 1993 onward reflect the debt on the day that the listed presidents were sworn in, as opposed to the month that they were elected. Because the Treasury Department doesn’t keep such daily debt figures before 1993, the numbers surrounding Reagan’s term ($908 billion and $2.6 trillion) reflect the debt several months before he was sworn in and several months before he left office, respectively.

more:
http://washingtonindependent.com/86213/whos-responsible-for-the-national-debt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. All of the above (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clear Blue Sky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. Everyone. Can't spend more than you take in. Yet they all do.
Don't leave out Congress. They actually do the appropriations and spending.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Good call on Congress
They're the worst offenders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. There have been a lot of Congress Critters and pork involved
And that privatization thing team bush pushed has been a killer to any sort of careful federal spending.

LOTS of corporations have been getting contracts for stuff federal employees did better and cheaper. Workers for those corporations usually not getting as much as fed employees did, so there is less payroll taxes going into the Treasury. CEOs, on the other hand get more and have better tax accountants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
5. And Clinton's 8 year increase was just over half as much as GHWB's 4 year increase.
Historical records clearly indicate the national debt increases more when a Republican President is in office. And it gets even worse when Republicans control Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. But...I thought they were the party of small govt.?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Here, let me share an article with you.
Democratic Superiority, By the Numbers

It's not a recent article, and I have shared it at DU several times over the years. But it effectively demonstrates what you and I are saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. This says it all:
"As for measures of general prosperity, each president inherits the economy. What counts is what happens next. Let's take just two measures, although they all show the same thing: Democrats do better under every variation. From 1960 to 2005 the gross domestic product measured in year-2000 dollars rose an average of $165 billion a year under Republican presidents and $212 billon a year under Democrats. Measured from 1989, or measured with a one-year delay, or both, the results are similar. And how about this one? The average annual rise in real per capita income -- that's the statistic that puts money in your pocket. Democrats score about 30 percent higher.

Democratic presidents have a better record on inflation (averaging 3.13 percent compared with 3.89 percent for Republicans) and on unemployment (5.33 percent versus 6.38 percent). Unemployment went down in the average Democratic year, up in the average Republican one.

Almost forgot: If you start in 1981 and if you factor in a year's delay, Republican presidents edge out Democratic ones on inflation, 4.57 to 4.36. Congratulations. "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
6. Wage stagnation for 30 years coupled with tax cuts on business & the wealthy
These are correctable problems if our politicians really want to fix it.

I wont hold my breath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
8. the nation meaning you and I included
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
9. I thought they just printed more?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
montanto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
12. unfortunately, we are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
13. Mostly??? Republicans, the corporate leeches, and the ivory tower wealthy they serve
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
14. The 3 Republicans. Seriously. Bill Clinton gave us a surplus, and
Obama inherited a huge debt and a enormous recession. He had no choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC