Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

4 reasons Democrats will hold the House

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 03:11 PM
Original message
4 reasons Democrats will hold the House
Edited on Wed May-05-10 03:15 PM by babylonsister
May. 4 2010 - 3:22 pm

4 reasons Democrats will hold the House
By MARK STRICHERZ


snip//

But the chances that this witches’ brew will doom the party this fall strikes me as unlikely. Barring a national calamity or Republican implosion, Democrats will likely hold on. Think about it. Democrats would need to lose 40 House seats to relinquish the majority, a large number by anyone’s estimation. Losing that many seats in an election cycle takes more than a lousy economy, wide distrust of Congress, and unpopular legislation. Losing that many seats takes incompetent or pathetic party leadership. And whatever you might say about Obama, Reid, and Pelosi, they are not politically incompetent.

snip//

Democratic Party leaders have not committed any large self-inflicted wounds:

Certainly they have been tempted to do so. On cultural issues, their base sought indirect federal funding of abortion without limit and seeks to make D.C. a state while keeping the district’s restrictive gun-control laws and to overturn the military’s ban on gays serving openly. But leadership stepped in and have squelched those possibilities. Democratic cultural conservatives would have more reason bolt the party in November, while Republican cultural conservatives will have less reason to turn out to vote.

As for potential scandals, Democratic leaders have dampened those. They could have let Rep. Charles Rangel keep his seat as chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee. They could have defended Rep. Eric Massa as a wayward or misunderstood politician. Instead, heeding the advice of party moderates, they kicked Rangel to the sidelines; and heeding common sense, they booted Massa.

Democratic leaders have helped themselves:

The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee has outraised and outspent its GOP counterpart. You didn’t read that wrong. The DCCC has bested the RCCC. For all of House Democrats’ political woes, they are still raking in the cash, or comparatively so. The Dems’ cash advantage will come in handy. Political scientists Alan Abramowitz, Matthew Gunning, and Brad Gunning found that the high cost of political campaigns was one of the two key reasons that the number of competitive congressional seats over the past four decades had declined.

The GOP has helped Democrats:

The Memphis Grizzlies’ trade of Kwame Brown to the Los Angeles Lakers for Pau Gasol may be the greatest gift one opponent has bestowed upon another.. Arizona’s recent law that seeks to clamp down on illegal immigration was not as big of a donation, but it’s in the conversation. Yes, Arizona’s law enjoys the support of most Americans, but few voters will head to the polls to express their pleasure with Arizona for doing so. Instead, Hispanics and more than a few white liberals will come out to register their distinct unpleasure with Arizona.

Democratic constituencies are weakened but not demoralized:

Young people, blacks, and single females perhaps are far less likely to vote in mid-term elections. But the party’s white upper-class voters aren’t. According to Gallup, highly educated voters are rarin’ to go to the polls. And unlike in 1994, when Democrats could not even put health care reform up for a vote, the party’s educated, suburban voters have little reason to be deflated this time around.

more...


http://trueslant.com/markstricherz/2010/05/04/4-reasons-democrats-will-hold-the-house/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. If health care had failed, I would have considered not voting at all
Which would have been a symbolic gesture anyway because I live in a solid red Republican district and my state has no Senate race this year.

But with the bill's passage, now I WILL vote and send some money to other candidates who I strongly support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Agreed that Obama, Reid and Pelosi are not politically incompetent,
but rahm ignoring our 50 states continues to raise my ire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
airforceone88888888 Donating Member (36 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. i hope
you're right :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikekohr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. Some one unrecommended this?
Why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
5. 1994 had few things going on...the assault weapons ban and the failure of health care.
Also, Dems were in power for an incredibly long time. The House banking scandal that started in 1992 led to an ouster of many Dems. Newt pushed that scandal hard which was ironic when he had his own scandal with his book deal. Those were some significant things that led to the Rethug takeover in 1994.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
6. Plus the mood of the country is changing... many are becoming more optimistic..
and give Democrats and Prez Obama credit for rescuing the economy. Democrats will be fine in November. For sure some losses but no change in leadership in either chamber.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
7. Recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
8. K&R!!
This part is huge

Democratic Party leaders have not committed any large self-inflicted wounds:

Steele, Boehner, Bachmann, the Kings, Palin, it just goes on and on McCain, Cheney.. they are running at the mouth 24/7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
9. The author lost me when he touted Reid's "competence"
The bottom line is that the best thing the Dems have going for them is the teabaggers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Really? You know it is a reality that it was easier for Pelosi to pass legislation in the House
than Reid to do so in the Senate even with a 60-vote majority and then losing Ted Kennedy's seat, thanks to the Filibuster. But Reid did get HCR passed and did out maneuver the GOP (so far) on Financial Reform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
10. 1 reason Democrats won't...
WE GET COMPLACENT AND DON'T CAMPAIGN.

Don't EVER think ANY election is EVER in the bag.

NGU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
11. I really don't see us losing nearly enough to lose the majoirty.
As I look at it, I think we'll lose 15-25.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC