Krugman pre-empts WSJ, answers Delay et al on 'voluntary' Unemployment

[Kurt_and_Hunter]

March 7, 2010, 4:59 pm Supply, Demand, and Unemployment

Bureau of Labor Statistics
I hear through the grapevine that the usual suspects at the WSJ have put out something along the lines of “Krugman says that unemployment benefits won’t raise unemployment, but in his textbook he says they will, neener neener.” Are they really that stupid? Probably not — but they you think that you, the reader, are that stupid.

But anyway, maybe this is a good time to explain the difference between determinants of the NAIRU — the minimum rate of unemployment consistent with a stable inflation rate — and the determinants of the unemployment rate at a point in time.

So: there are limits to how hot you can run the economy without inflationary problems. This is usually expressed in terms of a non-accelerating-inflation unemployment rate; yes, there are some questions about whether the concept is quite right, especially at very low inflation, but that’s another issue.

Everyone agrees that really generous unemployment benefits, by reducing the incentive to seek jobs, can raise the NAIRU; that is, set limits to how far down you can push unemployment without running into inflation problems.But in case you haven’t noticed, that’s not the problem constraining job growth in America right now. Wage growth is declining, not rising, and so is overall inflation. A wage-price spiral looks like a distant dream.

...snip...

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/07/supply-demand-and-unemployment/

[Clio the Leo]

1. Just because DELAY is enjoying being out of work, doesn't mean anyone else is. NT

kick & rec

[Demeter]

2. I'm Enjoying DeLay's Unemployment

in fact, the whole world probably is. Except his family...

[Zoeisright]

3. Delay is too stupid to understand this.

And even if he understood it, he's too cruel to care.