Valuing The Votes Of The Poor | North Carolina & NVRA Section 7 implementation

[Sapphire Blue]

Valuing The Votes Of The Poor
Scott Novakowski
May 24, 2007

Scott Novakowski is a policy analyst at Demos: A Network for Ideas & Action. Dēmos is a non-partisan public policy research and advocacy organization committed to building an America that achieves its highest democratic ideals. This report can be found here.


Thousands of low-income North Carolinians are now finding it much easier to register to vote, thanks to the North Carolina State Board of Elections’ efforts to ensure the state is in full compliance with an often-neglected provision of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993.

Congress passed the NVRA in 1993 in order to increase the number of citizens who register to vote and to protect the integrity of our electoral system. Recognizing that the law’s provision requiring voter registration in motor vehicle departments would fail to adequately reach low-income citizens, Congress also required voter registration to be offered at public assistance agencies. Such agencies are well suited to perform this function since they are in regular contact with millions of low-income citizens and often have client empowerment as a central part of their mission.

While most states have established programs to register voters at motor vehicle departments, many have neglected to implement the public assistance registration provisions of the law—also known as Section 7 of the NVRA. A report by the NVRA Implementation Project—a joint effort of Demos, Project Vote, ACORN—showed that public assistance voter registrations had declined by 59 percent between 1995-1996 and 2003-2004. This decline occurred while registrations from all other sources increased by over 24 percent. Site checks at public assistance agencies across the country revealed significant lapses in the voter registration program. Non-compliance results in an unacceptable income gap in registration rates: in 2004, 59 percent of citizens in households making less than $15,000 a year were registered to vote versus 85 percent of those in households making $75,000 or more a year.

Over the past two years, the NVRA Implementation Project has worked with states across the country to improve compliance with the public assistance provisions of the NVRA. Most recently, surveys conducted outside public assistance agencies in North Carolina indicated serious non-compliance with the law. Statistical evidence underscored the problem. Data submitted by North Carolina to the federal agencies indicated a 73.5 percent decline in public assistance registrations in the state between 1995-1996 and 2003-2004. In 2005, public assistance offices in each of 35 counties registered fewer than 10 clients and public assistance offices in 11 of those 35 counties did not register a single client.

When the project—in partnership with the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law—notified Gary Bartlett, Executive Director of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, of the state’s compliance problem, he expressed concern and acted immediately, developing and rolling out a 10-point plan to bring the state into compliance with the law.

While data collection is still in its preliminary stages, the initial results from the local agencies are remarkable (and are further outlined in a new report published by Demos this month):

• Eleven percent more voters were registered in the single month of February 2007 than in the entire year of 2005 in the 30 counties providing complete data.
• Twenty-two of these 30 counties registered more voters in the single month of February than in all of 2005. Many of these counties registered twice as many voters in February than in all of 2005.
• Guilford County, which includes the city of Greensboro, registered over 30 times as many people in the single month of February 2007 as it did in all of 2005. Similarly, Mecklenburg County, which includes the city of Charlotte, registered significantly more voters in February 2007 than in all of 2005.
• In the 58 of 100 counties that have provided data in the February and March 2007, at least 5,441 new low-income North Carolinians were brought into the democratic process through public assistance voter registration.

http://www.tompaine.com/articles/2007/05/24/valuing_the_votes_of_the_poor.php

http://www.demos.org/pubs/NVRA.pdf

http://www.demos.org/pubs/NVRA.pdf

[EFerrari]

1. What a great program. K&R

[EFerrari]

2. kick

[calimary]

3. Sapphire Blue, you are aptly named. You're a veritable news prospector!

And you always find gems!

:yourock:

:hug:

[nam78_two]

4. K&R.nt

[Catchawave]

5. Excellent !

SB, you've brought many great causes and programs to light here at DU so I just wanted to :toast: and :hug: and :kick: and Rrrrr you :D

You need to crosspost all your diaries to DKos to reach even more progressive eyes! Also, the media and the trackers at the National Journal.

[lildreamer316]

6. Finally some good news from my state!

AND my county! (leads in 2007 registrations increase as per the chart above). Yay for a red state. Maybe we will be more blue this time....

[brer cat]

7. Good news, Sapphire Blue.

Do you know if there is any chance this could be combined with offering photo IDs (free)? More and more states are looking into requiring IDs to vote, and that's hard to come by for many poor, and especially homeless people.

Thank you for your tireless work!

[EFerrari]

8. kick before work

[mntleo2]

9. I Read This Earlier

I have often said that the votes of the poor are enormous if they weren't so disenfranchised. This is why John Edwards is so much of an attraction for them because he speaks of poverty and is doing something about it. In Venezuela, when the poor voted in an atmosphere much like we have today, they won ~ and it was a third party they put into office with an overwhelming majority much to the shock and dismay of the other 2 parties. Like us they had a two party system, the media owned by a few, the elite running things, and the poor had no voice,yet because they 60% of the population that usually did not vote, they won!

So if we really had a majority system, which I do not think we really have (even without the college vote) because of the caging and other ways of shutting off our votes, Democrats would win hands down.

But this is too easy and because the Dems are almost as tied in with the elite as the Repigs, it would be difficult to convince them we need a "velvet revolution" where the common people take power within the system we have. Nope, I believe they like their bretheren Repigs, just cannot stand the idea that the poor might actually have some intelligence and insight as to how our nation would better benefit all if the poor were not disenfranchised.

My 2 cents

Cat In Seattle