Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'm Thankful For Elizabeth Warren !!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 01:14 PM
Original message
I'm Thankful For Elizabeth Warren !!!
Elizabeth Warren Helped Shoot Down Bill That Would Have Sped Foreclosures, Calendar Shows
Shahien Nasiripour - HuffingtonPost
First Posted: 11-24-10 05:13 PM | Updated: 11-24-10 05:37 PM

<snip>

Elizabeth Warren was the first senior Obama administration official to recognize the potentially incendiary impact of a bill that would have made it significantly easier for mortgage companies to foreclose on homes, and her subsequent warnings played a crucial role in persuading the President to veto the measure, according to freshly released documents and people familiar with the deliberations.

The disclosure that Warren was instrumental in halting a bill that would have streamlined the foreclosure process comes as she confronts fierce criticism from Republicans on Capitol Hill for the way she was appointed to construct a new consumer financial protection bureau, and characterizations that she is inclined to take an overly punitive tack with Wall Street.


A long-time advocate for greater regulation of the financial system and a prominent critic of predatory lending, Warren now finds herself at the center of an intensifying debate over the relationship between the Obama administration and the business world.

For consumer advocates, who have long decried what they portray as Wall Street's outsized influence in Washington, Warren represents their greatest hope that big banks will be more tightly supervised following the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. For a vocal group of business leaders and their Republican allies, Warren has become Exhibit A in their case that the Obama administration is anti-business.

The decisive way in which she labored behind the scenes to stymie a bill that would have eased requirements for documentation in the foreclosure process underscores how her arrival has altered the administration's relationship with major banks.

The bill, which passed both houses of Congress and awaited President Obama's signature to become law, essentially would have compelled notaries to accept out-of-state notarizations, regardless of the rules in those states.


<snip>

More: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/24/elizabeth-warren-calendar_n_788120.html

:bounce::woohoo::bounce:

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. amen ... K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Shouldn't she be a part of the cabinet or inner circle or something?
This temporary set up position is much too transitory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. There's Apparently No Time Limit On That...
Articles were written a while back that said she could spend a couple of years putting the Department together, and Obama could appoint her to head it when the political winds were more favorable... like after the 2012 Elections.

They put her up now, she won't get past the Senate.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Did Axelrod or Jarrett need to be approved?
All I'm saying is that Obama needs to have her input on all this stuff as long as he is in office. All these Clintonites are too focused on the big picture, but we need someone who gets the implications of the details too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Oh... I See What You're Saying... And I Completely Agree...
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. Elizabeth Warren 2012. Time for the corporate a$$ ki$$ing to stop!
:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. Aside for her consumer advocacy, what other qualifications does
she have to be a Presidential candidate? Seriously. She already works for the President of The United States. Congratulations to him for selecting her for this position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Warren is easily as qualified as Obama if not MORE qualified. Guess you don't think a woman
could do the job. :eyes:

Make that a highly qualified, ethical and honest woman at that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. No, I guess you don't know what I think.
So, tell me her qualifications for the Presidency, if you know them. I have no doubt that she is very ethical and honest. I cheered her appointment, and repeated that today.

Some people are allowing their dislike for President Obama to cause them to champion anyone they like at the moment as a potential primary opponent. If you think Warren should be President, start pointing out her qualifications, not just in consumer protection, but also international affairs and other issues Presidents have to face.

You're making a judgment about me you're not in any way qualified to make. You don't know me. Please stick to the subject, which is Warren's qualifications as a potential President. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Qualifications for the Office of President - U.S. Constitution:
Qualifications for the Office of President

Age and Citizenship requirements - US Constitution, Article II, Section 1

No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.

Term limit amendment - US Constitution, Amendment XXII, Section 1 – ratified February 27, 1951

No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.


Link: http://www.presidentsusa.net/qualifications.html

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Checkmate!
Thanks! :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Dupe.
Edited on Fri Nov-26-10 08:30 PM by MineralMan
Web glitch. Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cal33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Yes. There should be more highly qualified, hard-working,
decent and honest people like Elizabeth Warren in high office. She is workibng
for the betterment of the whole nation, not just for her own benefit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. That's exactly why Warren would be perfect for the job. Because she really cares
about the entire nation-not just the rich and well connected.

Warren is the type of hope & change this country really needs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cal33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. From all appearances, I'm inclined to agree with you. But we
don't even know if she would even be interested in the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. The Republicans have her as one of their top targets
The see her as a threat especially since she got the bill veto'd. Does anyone know who proposed the bill? That's who we should be identifying,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
9. Kick !!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
10. Indeed. Thanks go to President Obama for appointing her.
She's a great spokesperson for all of us, and President Obama is listening closely to her, as this veto demonstrates. Thanks, President Obama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Exactly !!! - Now, If He Can Appoint 5 Or 6 More Similar Types, We The People, Might Have A Chance
Replacing Geitner would be a great start.

:shrug:

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChimpersMcSmirkers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
21. She's just another example of Obama's corporate whoring, oh wait, wat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC