Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CHENEY Believes He MUST TIE BUSH's Hands-VP & Staff Engaged In INSUBORDINATION AGAINST BUSH

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:41 PM
Original message
CHENEY Believes He MUST TIE BUSH's Hands-VP & Staff Engaged In INSUBORDINATION AGAINST BUSH
Edited on Thu May-24-07 12:43 PM by kpete
Cheney Attempting to Constrain Bush's Choices on Iran Conflict: Staff Engaged in Insubordination Against President Bush

.............

But this is worrisome. The person in the Bush administration who most wants a hot conflict with Iran is Vice President Cheney. The person in Iran who most wants a conflict is Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Iran's Revolutionary Guard Quds Force would be big winners in a conflict as well -- as the political support that both have inside Iran has been flagging.

.....................

This White House official has stated to several Washington insiders that Cheney is planning to deploy an "end run strategy" around the President if he and his team lose the policy argument.

.......

This White House official has stated to several Washington insiders that Cheney is planning to deploy an "end run strategy" around the President if he and his team lose the policy argument.

................

The zinger of this information is the admission by this Cheney aide that Cheney himself is frustrated with President Bush and believes, much like Richard Perle, that Bush is making a disastrous mistake by aligning himself with the policy course that Condoleezza Rice, Bob Gates, Michael Hayden and McConnell have sculpted.

According to this official, Cheney believes that Bush can not be counted on to make the "right decision" when it comes to dealing with Iran and thus Cheney believes that he must tie the President's hands.


....................

-- Steve Clemons


more at:
http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/002145.php

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. So they let the meglomaniacal son of a bitch remain in the
administration? Oh wait, its Cheney's administration, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Interesting ...
Could you add the missing link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellenfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. the missing link? isn't that the chimperor? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. link woud be good nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. link please nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's this kind of thing that says we must impeach now.
Edited on Thu May-24-07 12:46 PM by speedoo
But Cheney has to go as well. He can't be contained, evidently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Impeach Cheney
It is the most important step towards regaining our Constitutional democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Impeach Cheney? Without the votes secured in the Senate?
Nah. Much easier to let him have his head and destroy another country out of paranoid fear.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Actually, the votes might be there, or pretty close. Cheney isn't loved by ANYONE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Right...the hell with sanity we have to worry about how the...
democrats in Washington are going to look in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Very true
I'm so glad you aren't part of that "sleeper cell" that's showed up to unjustifiably bash the Dems today. Me either.

(Tongue firmly in cheek!!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. No I'm here every day, as an equal opportunity basher...
Edited on Thu May-24-07 01:05 PM by Hubert Flottz
I mainly bash bushies, or people who act like bushies, or people who enable those people, when they are asking for it, aka f?cking up!

(Tongue firmly in shoes!!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. LOL
Me too, but I'm not beyond laying into the Dems when they deserve it either. Even if it brings out the Dem Borgs who want to assimilate us all!

:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Isn't there a certain Congressman advocating that?
The legislation that NOBODY is supporting?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrainGlutton Donating Member (202 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
42. As a matter of fact, Kucinich has introduced a bill to impeach Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. First, Gonzales, then Rove, then Cheney, then Bush
All of them have to go. Some will resign out of shame and some will have to be impeached. The key is the caging lists. They cheated in the 2004 election. That was essentially a coup. They should not be allowed to keep what they have stolen -- which was their offices and the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. Gonzales is a tool, and Rove is not impeachable.
Cheney has to go first. He is the most dangerous, as this piece demonstrates. Bush can be contained by the congress, IMO, but not Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodermon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Why is Rove Not Impeachable?
Edited on Thu May-24-07 01:06 PM by yodermon
Constitution, Article II section 4:
The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.


What is the legal definition of a "civil officer of the US", and is Rove one?
It doesn't just mean elected officials, does it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Interesting.
I don't know what that definition is. I had assumed that only elected officials were impeachable, but that's incorrect, since Supreme Court Justices evidently are impeachable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Appointed people are impeachable
I don't know if Rove falls into the category of civil officers. He's more like Bush's employee. He wasn't confirmed by anyone, I know that. Gonzo was as AG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #29
39. Do my taxes pay his salary?
I assume they do. If so, he should be impeachable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #39
44. I prefer arrested, actually.
I guess we could do both. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BonnieJW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. Rove is a political advisor to the pres.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #26
51. Daily Kos thread on impeaching Rove so he can't be pardoned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
32. Sorry but they have no shame
If Gonzo hasn't resigned by now it just proves that shame is not a word in their dictionary,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
34. What good does any of it do if the oil people, Israel, religious
dictators, and those who support the perpetual war of Israel and their neighbors - are still dictating policy and are still in all the important policy making positions? Looks utterly dark today, but the truth can show through even in the dark. We are plucked if we don't admit that we are being run by all of the above factions.

We are in the middle of a religios and a to-the-end earth resource war. Can we save ourselves from them?

(Let me save someone the trouble of spending the energy to accuse me of being anti-Semite - I am pro-human - I am for all the humans in Israel, Palestine, Iran and every other country caught in the war called by a few, including and especially our own - there are way too many citizen-victims all over this globe - all spun, lied to, and laughed at by a few.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. Bush is as evil as his VP and is as much a true believer on Iraq as Cheney
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. Wouldn't Cheney be in violation of the Logan Act if he did that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
47. Oh, yeah, a law that says he can't do that, how, um, quaint!
Do you seriously think that a law would prevent Dick from doing something?

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. The PNAC plan was to raid Iran too.
The president of Iran is asking for it too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
13. I'd heard that Gates and Rice were doing an end-run around Cheney--
they have a little bit of conscience and common-sense left, I guess. This confirms it. Chimpy is just hapless and caught in the middle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neecy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
17. my god...
Read the whole thing. He wants Israel to do a pre-emptive strike so Iran will attack our warships in the Gulf.

Nice to see Cheney 'supports the troops' by allowing them to be attacked in open waters...IMPEACH THIS BASTARD NOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Supports the troops by using them as bait in his trap.
They support their bank accounts and nothing else. Money and power are the Gods who control what Bush does next.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
21. But I thought Halliburton has business interests in Iran:
Business As Usual?
Halliburton’s CEO says his company is pulling out of Iran. But a corporate subsidiary is still going ahead with a deal to develop Tehran’s natural gas fields



WEB EXCLUSIVE
By Michael Isikoff and Mark Hosenball
Newsweek
Updated: 6:10 p.m. CT Feb 16, 2005
Feb. 16 - Only weeks before Halliburton made headlines by announcing it was pulling out of Iran—a nation George W. Bush has labeled part of the “axis of evil”—the Texas-based oil services firm quietly signed a major new business deal to help develop Tehran’s natural gas fields.

Halliburton’s new Iran contract, moreover, appears to suggest a far closer connection with the country’s hard-line government than the firm has ever acknowledged.

The deal, diplomatic sources tell NEWSWEEK, was signed with an Iranian oil company whose principals include Sirus Naseri, Tehran’s chief international negotiator on matters relating to the country’s hotly-disputed nuclear enrichment program—a project the Bush administration has charged is intended to develop nuclear weapons.



-snip

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6982444/site/newsweek/

Were they forced to abandon their goals?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
22. Keep your powder dry.
Pay no attention to DK's articles of impeachment against Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
23. Photo: Vice-President Dick Cheney, in disguise, attempts to tie the President's hands!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
31. So, Cheney would like his first gift to his grandson to be a nuclear war? How thoughtful!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
33. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##
==================
GROVELBOT.EXE v4.0
==================



This week is our second quarter 2007 fund drive. Democratic
Underground is a completely independent website. We depend on donations
from our members to cover our costs. Thank you so much for your support.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slowry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. LOLLL??? Greatest thing I've ever seen. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
35. I don't care what they do in the privacy of their bedrooms. Can we get them out of OUR White House?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
37. Why the fuck does this asshat want to blow everything up ???
Jebus, Dick ... just go hunting, ok ? :hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
38. Many of the other Cheney's, Rumsfeld's, Feith's, Card's et al have committed
crimes while hiding in the shadows-which have had the light of truth shining on them for years.

Meanwhile privatization (consolidation of criminally led organizations and the so called black budget money laundering networks) continues and more people are dying, international tensions are rising and Mr. Bush has given himself extraordinary powers in the event of him calling a "national emergency" (which he extended for another year last October anyway-just before the midterms).

Then those of US that will NGU get the isolation treatment, but that isn't working well either.

It's a real mess that someone has to clean, regardless of all else-if things continue Mr. Bush will have the option of declaring some kind of "crisis" that will get the loyal Bushies of Homeland Security some overtime. It starts at the top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. THE MADNESS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #41
48. Wasn't there a recent authorization to covertly undermine the Iranian government?
I seem to remember a thread about that in the past week.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bamacrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
40. He needs to be taken out of office.
I now believe that bush was just a more electable head than Cheney and it is him who runs this. He needs to go, we need to make him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
43. this quote is VERY interesting, imo . . .
"It's quite eerie to see in print what I've long opined -- that they (I actually thought it would be Bush, not Cheney) will use Israel to start the war that we'll be 'contractually' obligated to participate in and finish. Completely bypasses Congress, who'll nary lift a digit to dissent." poster MP

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. The House does not have enough members with spine to
start Impeachment on Darth. Most Dems fear Darth. I suspect that he has NSA dossiers on most of them that prevent them from any Impeachment of any Rethugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #43
50. Thanks for pointing that out
I only scanned the article briefly and missed it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
46. I have NO IDEA WHAT TO MAKE OF THIS BIZARRE REPORT!
Seems like Steve his hearing some real "KOOL AID" stuff...but Cheney should have been "REMOVED" LONG AGO...I don't know who has Steve's ear on this...but it's totally Weird!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
49. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
52. I don't buy it.
Bush, Rice, Cheney et all are all on the same neocabal page. I agree with the speculation of some of the posters at Clemons' blog that this is just a phony good cop bad cop media set-up -- further paving and public conditioning for the increasingly insane policy aims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. I don't know if they really are. Do you really think Bush is that smart?
I don't think he's intelligent enough to pull it off.

Cheney's the President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. I wouldn't credit Bush.
Edited on Thu May-24-07 09:43 PM by chill_wind
Cheney's chimperor doesn't have to think this stuff up. He just has to stay with the script and be the good tool for the pee-knackers and rump Pentagon cold-warriors that he is.

I suspect Snarl has no trepidations at all taking the tepid media heat for "bad cop".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #52
58. I think you're right.
More precisely it's "scheming corrupt cop, stupid cop".

Cheney sets up the "emergency" situations, mostly keeping B*sh out of the loop so that he can act surprised when they happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
55. Let's look at this
You have Bush who has authority problems with Daddy and a crumbling presidency because of mad Dick. You have the old guard of Daddy trying to get some first Gulf War restraint and common sense back. You have Cheney who was thwarted under Reagan and Bush I and who has no support or rational credibility outside his no holds barred neocon clique. Then you have the ME where the israelis plan for war, probably the Saudis as well. The iranian leadership overcome by the failures of America, the prizes and their own shaky internal popularity among their own people, the imminent danger of the bald threat, who are tempted to exploit the "inevitability"- so far- of a war moving along without check.

I add this up and most of the equation points to war. Bush senior at best argues for some control, some practicality and competence, some restraint in the ambiguous attempt to rescue Sonny without major policy changes. Real help would have been dumping Cheney. No progress toward at least a rational dastardly policy or no new war can seriously be made. It is a question mark whether the humiliated, outgrabbing Bush Jr. enjoys their influence or whether he even wants to resolve the murky conflict involved with the new CIA director and Secretary of Defense. so far he is stubbornly pointed to desperate continuance, tanking or gambling according to the "plan" which Cheney embodies.

Adding up the hopes for peace shows a wounded beast lurching toward war and all restraints weak, qualified, thwarted, divided. At best it shows all parties bumbling unsure and engaged in slowing squabbles. Should shit ensue this bodes very very ill for anyone on any side if actual hostilities are forced, especially with the worsened purges and politicization of attack forces themselves before the war even starts. You can almost write the "retrospective" reasons why everything went wrong militarily and blew up in our faces. I say that with bitterness because the first casualty of war has been strapped down alive in the morgue still screaming to deaf, bewildered, desperate elites and their propaganda machines, but readily heard by any interested passersby.

Time, the sense of the "phony war" is the same as it ever was, peace being relative to the lull of the moment. Yet we can hear and see all the players, the movements and pretty much guess everything except the "surprise" date and the possible "horrific" pretext or merely the bull-horned Tonkin crap again.
I am sure the early window is closing which is why Cheney is beside himself with worry that the whole thing might yet be derailed. Sometimes I wonder why he worries except that Bush Jr. just might implode considering his personal insufficiencies way past the border of the idiotic. Small wonder that Cheney sees himself as the one determined force and power to make the final decision. The forces against war are almost deliberately powerless, diffuse, obtuse, trapped in shamefaced institutional routine or dirty hands in the pie.

The end result of this sloppy non-infighting- so far- I predict is a bigger botch and more horrible result of a new war action. You would think at least the military would see the light by now, but any opposition now has likely been pre-empted even though it was CORRECT the first time. Are the commanders that stupid not to see how blindsided this makes their participation in the the entire plan?
In other words, planning is very potentially worse off than ever. With ambiguity on the part of the old
guard replacements should they lose the footdragging waffle conflict there is not even a clear TOP down
civilian force like last time. You'd have to literally let Cheney and Israel make the big decisions and
the the decimated command officers pick up the ball. The legality notions have been left far behind all the broken laws and impunity. It is just a mess of broken china to which more will be added. horror, lawlessness, stupidity, blindness and impotence have become routine pre-amble to bully violence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buck Rabbit Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
56. Is Cheney going to take Bush hunting? .. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AikidoSoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. ROFL
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
59. Mr. Cheney is a war criminal, profiteer and traitor. His shadow govt is a criminal conspiracy. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC