Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bombs Away: Afghan Air War Peaks With 1,000 Strikes in October

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
douglas9 Donating Member (762 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 05:39 AM
Original message
Bombs Away: Afghan Air War Peaks With 1,000 Strikes in October
The U.S. and its allies have unleashed a massive air campaign in Afghanistan, launching missiles and bombs from the sky at a rate rarely seen since the war’s earliest days. In October alone, NATO planes fired their weapons on 1,000 separate missions, U.S. Air Force statistics provided to Danger Room show. Since Gen. David Petraeus took command of the war effort in late June, coalition aircraft have flown 2,600 attack sorties. That’s 50% more than they did during the same period in 2009. Not surprisingly, civilian casualties are on the rise, as well.

NATO officials say the increase in air attacks is simply a natural outgrowth of a more aggressive campaign to push militants out of their strongholds in southern Afghanistan. “Simply put, our air strikes have increased because our operations have increased. We’ve made a concentrated effort in the south to clear out the insurgency and therefore have increased our number of troops on the ground and aircraft to support them in this effort,” Lt. Nicole Schwegman, a NATO spokesperson, tells Danger Room.

On the other hand, some outside observers believe the strikes are part of an attempt to soften up the insurgency before negotiations with them begin in earnest. But one thing is clear: it’s a strategy Petraeus has used before. Once he took over the Iraq war effort, air strikes jumped nearly sevenfold.

Next month, the Obama administration is set to review the strategy for the Afghanistan campaign. Petraeus’ newly-aggressive approach will almost certainly part of that examination. It’s a dramatic reversal from Gen. Stanley McChrystal’s strategy, which drastically restricted the use of air power — even when troops came under fire.

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/11/bombs-away-afghan-air-war-peaks-with-1000-strikes-in-october/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 05:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. isn't everyone dead yet? you'd think they would be by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 05:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. Hurray for Freedom and Liberty! Oh wait...
Nevermind. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 05:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's easier to take if you think of it as only 32 a day ... isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 06:08 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I find it easier to think of as one air strike every 45 minutes.
For a solid month.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 06:11 AM
Response to Original message
5. yeah... but its bombs of hope and change. they should be happy
much better than the last bombs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 07:01 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. The explosions represent the fiercest of advocacy. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 06:32 AM
Response to Original message
6. Maybe that is a new mining technique?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
era veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
7. Fuck this war, declare victory and leave
If the Taliban comes back and provides sanctuary to the Al Qaeda we can go back in and fuck them up and leave again. The only way to win there is kill everybody. That's how the Romans built empire. Hopefully we have passed that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-10 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
9. And to think John Nichols encouraged us to choose Obama over Hillary Clinton
in the 2008 primary because he was more likely to end the wars. Because of that great speech he gave a long long time ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. I feel so used. Hillary was right. All Obama had was a speech.
How could I have been so fooled?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 03:04 AM
Response to Original message
11. We bring hope and change with bullets and bombs.
Edited on Fri Nov-12-10 03:04 AM by Rex
Where have you been?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConsAreLiars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 04:47 AM
Response to Original message
12. How irrational a dumbass stupid and bought-out corporate jackass plaything can a Pres be?
OK, the 3rd generation hitlerist monkey king selected by the SCOTUS gets all time awards for being a fratboy stupid jackass. No one will ever compete. "One Of Us" the five chanted.;

Current practice seems to be more of the same as advised by the same old advisors. No change. Just more of the same kill em, steal and occupy and grab and uber alles corporatist tactics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC