Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Now, have we learned our lesson, class?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 10:01 AM
Original message
Now, have we learned our lesson, class?
When we "won" the house and senate, WE DIDN'T REALLY WIN! It was a bunch of conservative Democrats who won. Why is it that when they win, they have people who are conservative, but when we win we don't have liberals? It's because we were trying to pull bullshit on people. Instead of actually changing their minds and winning that way, we had a bunch of knock-off republicans.

From now on we win by talking to people, and genuinely converting them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tjwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. meh...it is much easier to just blame the greens
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 10:11 AM by tjwash
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DonCoquixote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. K an R
Sorry to say, a lot of this mandate we were sold was BS, because of Blue dog Senators who were NEVER going to change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. Rec'd n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. Maybe because the country is only about 20% liberal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. You mean the country where single-payer polls in the mid 60s?
This is a liberal, populist county at heart. We just have no politicians who are truly liberal and populist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Doesn't matter much if the liberals can't get elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. So which is it? The country is too right wing, or we just can't get liberals elected?
You seem awfully invested in convincing us to compromise with the far right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. There isn't a connection between where the country is politically and who they elect? I didn't
say a thing about compromising with anybody. The reason the Senate and House weren't teeming with liberals after 2008 was because they don't get elected in large numbers because only 20% or so of the population claims to be liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Were you near a TV yesterday?
If you missed it, we just had an election where the country elected a bunch of people who have absolutely nothing to do with what the general population believes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kctim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Probably because
while saying you support single-payer may make you feel good, it doesn't mean you actually support it enough to be willing to pay for it.

And, while fantasy is fun, the reason we have no politicians who are truly liberal and populist is because The People have not voted them in yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Anyone who talks about being "willing to pay" for Single Payer betrays their ignorance
Single Payer would be LESS COSTLY than what people are paying now for insurance. Much less costly. And it would spur economic growth by lowering the bar for businesses to hire people.

If you don't understand that basic concept, you probably should avoid discussing the issue until you've educated yourself.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kctim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Taking opinion and projections as fact
also shows ignorance.

It is the opinion of single payer supporters that says the majority of people, who happen to be satisfied with their current plan, would be happier under single payer and they project that it will be cheaper and businesses will hire more people. I personally agree with that opinion and believe those projections, but those beliefs mean nothing when dealing with people who place individual rights before dollars.

If you refuse to understand that basic fact, you probably should just put your fingers in your ears and start screaming "we need to move further left."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. We need to move further to the left
If you don't understand that, get ready to lose a lot of elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. If you were to actually pay attention to results of national questionaires, you nwould know
differently.

Unless you have an agenda to push.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
6. Who's "we"?
Democrats?

Or the "True Democrats (tm)"?

Democrats ran and won in 2008. Unfortunately, the franchise wasn't restricted to True Democratic (tm) Voters who would elect True Democrats (tm) to execute the True Will (tm) of the True We the People (tm).

Sorry, I'm not into oligarchies, even if we dub them the Rule of the Pure. I've seen in on a small scale, considered it a deceptive form of oppression, seriously didn't like it, don't see how the idea has improved with age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Whah?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
13. Conservative Senate Democrats brought the party down with them yesterday.
They aren't worth it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC