Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why the NRA suddenly cares so much about Supreme Court nomination battles.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 10:25 AM
Original message
Why the NRA suddenly cares so much about Supreme Court nomination battles.
But never mind, the NRA took aim at Sotomayor with both barrels and suffered some embarrassment when its effort to scare senators failed to have much impact. This wobble over Sotomayor may explain why, when Elena Kagan was up for Supreme Court confirmation this year, the NRA evinced some initial confusion over tactics for the confirmation hearings themselves, and even prevented its board members from testifying against her. After all, the evidence that Kagan is hostile to gun rights was even flimsier than their case against Sotomayor.

Once the hearings started, however, the NRA got it together enough to decide that Kagan presented a serious threat to gun rights. Within 24 hours of her Senate testimony, there came the NRA letter to the Senate. Then the print and Web ads, leading to a national anti-Kagan ad that aired on Fox News and culminated in an urgent action alert telling members to call their senators and tell them to "OPPOSE and filibuster the Kagan nomination!" Finally, the NRA pledged to count the vote on Kagan's confirmation vote as a "key vote" in upcoming congressional scorecards. As John Nichols explains, this all-powerful marker for those who displease the NRA is nothing to sneeze at:

http://www.slate.com/id/2265980/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. any nominee from a black president will upset the neo klan crowd nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. The NRA and gun owners in general are not neo-klan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. I'm glad to see you didn't miss this opporunity to race bait.


:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gecko6400 Donating Member (114 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Absolute nonsense!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Otherwise known as Republicans. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. Lol - I can see this thread getting interesting. Nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. Popcorn for lunch? - mmmmm.
:popcorn: Why not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
7. To satisfy their overwhelmingly Republican owners? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paladin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
8. It's The Latest NRA Hyper-Paranoia Meme.

Those massive legal victories that have been delivered to the gun rights crowd by Tony Scalia and his merry bunch of results-driven judicial activists are hanging by a thread, according to the NRA---Obama's putting libruls on the Court and all the nation's guns are going bye-bye. They're just not happy unless they're scared shitless and miserble.....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HawkerHurricane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
10. The National Republican Association opposes the nominees
of a Democratic President? Not news.

No, really. I've seen the local NRA oppose a pro-hunter Democrat in favor of a Republican who tried to pass a gun control law on the city council. Why? Because "everyone knows" Democrats are anti-gun and Republicans are pro-gun. Except... this particular Democrat wasn't anti-gun, and this particular Republican wasn't pro-gun. But that didn't matter, the "everyone knows" part did.

I call them the National Republican Association, because that's what they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Which explains why they endorsed Bill Richardson
And why the NRA endorsed more Democrats than repugs in the 2010 state house primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HawkerHurricane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Did they? I'm amazed.
Maybe there's hope for the organization after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. They just endorsed an ex-cop congressional candidate (R) in my area
Edited on Sat Sep-04-10 12:40 PM by TheCowsCameHome
who was told by his former supervisor (the chief of police) that he didn't think the officer should be trusted with a gun.

How fucked up is that? But then again, he's a (R)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC