Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Next 'real war'?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 07:03 AM
Original message
Next 'real war'?
DoD Buzz: Next Predator, Stealthy And Fast
By Colin Clark Tuesday, August 10th, 2010 1:19 pm
Posted in Air, Intelligence, International, Naval

UAVs arent going to be as useful as they have been in Afghanistan and Iraq because, in the next real war ( :wtf: ) they are much more likely to face armed opposition from the ground and from the air.

The outgoing commander of US air assets in Europe, Gen. Roger Brady, told a recent UAV conference that the burden of proof, in my opinion, is on the proponents of UAS.

He cited maneuverability and stealth limitations as arguments against UAVs in contested airspace. It turns out the folks at General Atomics have been listening to these arguments and looking ahead. Chris Ames, director of strategic development, said they are developing a stealthy, jet-powered version of the Predator.

Predator C/Avenger will have a jet engines maneuverability, be able to fly at 400 knots for up to 20 hours and carry an impressive 3,000 pounds to 6,000 pounds of ordnance, Ames said.

The requirement doesnt exist yet at least not in the unclassified world but Ames says the company is aiming at the Navys unmanned carrier aircraft Unmanned Carrier Launched Airborne Surveillance and Strike (UCLASS) and at the Air Forces long-range strike program. Basically, it looks as if the strike program will include manned and unmanned capabilities and GA is targeting the unmanned portion. He also said the Missile Defense Agency is interested in the capability.

unhappycamper comment: WTF is up with 'the next real war'? Two occupations aren't enough for you?

Psssst. You guys may have heard some ramblings from America turning off lights in cities and unpaving roads because they are too expense to maintain. No problem... We need a more expensive stealthy drone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. They are under a delusion. They think existence is for war.
Edited on Wed Aug-11-10 07:08 AM by RandomThoughts
And many think the war is about who can be more violent. The war is love against war and that is not a war. Although they can not see that metaphor so many join the violent side, although it might be from being unable to see the metaphor in war stories.

The word war has many meanings, if you fight a war with love, you are not at war while at war. Because in your view war is not fighting, but loving, but it is still a conflict, but a conflict in the choices you make, not the amount of people you can kill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. We have to keep the MIC well funded and busy, the greed/money invested. To hell with
the citizens. This is USA, Inc. "We the Corporations." To hell with "We the People." Humans don't count, only cash flow into the right hands. Wake up America! This is not your country. It's USA, Inc.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top